Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Time to split RHPS CCES NCC. Enough of bussing our little kids if equity doesn't matter. My kids are going private but I will help with the charge to get this done. The Chevy Chase community has been screwed a second time. Bye bye housing values. Thanks RCF! You also screwed yourselves, your values will go down too. The board just set precedent. Proximity is what matters. Time for the RHPS bussing experiment to die, even if it means taking MCPS to court. Yes, I am bitter.
wow-- this poster sounds ridiculous. all your kids (our kids) will be fine. A few extra people of color around and parents start going crazy. calm down. you list. don't get ridiculous about housing prices, etc....
wow-- this poster sounds ridiculous. all your kids (our kids) will be fine. A few extra people of color around and parents start going crazy. calm down. you list. don't get ridiculous about housing prices, etc....
Anonymous wrote:Time to split RHPS CCES NCC. Enough of bussing our little kids if equity doesn't matter. My kids are going private but I will help with the charge to get this done. The Chevy Chase community has been screwed a second time. Bye bye housing values. Thanks RCF! You also screwed yourselves, your values will go down too. The board just set precedent. Proximity is what matters. Time for the RHPS bussing experiment to die, even if it means taking MCPS to court. Yes, I am bitter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So instead of balancing capacity and demographics NOW, they kicked the can down 5 years. Then we hear it wasn't REALLY about proximity, it was more about articulation? They will be isolated? Not buying it. They are "saving" space at Westland for Pyle kids that has no additional space. Where in the regulations does it say that is a factor? Also, I feel that the board didn't want to disrespect Dr Smith and went with his recommendation.
They could've just saved us all the drama and went with this rationale from the beginning. There was no need for subsequent hearings this fall following the Superintendent's recommendation when there was a full year of public input. The fact that they even went through the show of considering a new Option 11 that had not been consulted on shows that the BOE is an unprofessional mess. Just look at all of the ridiculous drama these clowns have caused by such a terrible process. They have made people more angry than they otherwise would've been by going through the pretense that they would even consider a different outcome.
Anonymous wrote:Time to split RHPS CCES NCC. Enough of bussing our little kids if equity doesn't matter. My kids are going private but I will help with the charge to get this done. The Chevy Chase community has been screwed a second time. Bye bye housing values. Thanks RCF! You also screwed yourselves, your values will go down too. The board just set precedent. Proximity is what matters. Time for the RHPS bussing experiment to die, even if it means taking MCPS to court. Yes, I am bitter.
Anonymous wrote:I think the board has now opened up a serious can of worms regarding rosemary hills and that is really unfortunate. Hard to justify busing kids throughout the cluster to Rosemary Hills after last night's decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Time to split RHPS CCES NCC. Enough of bussing our little kids if equity doesn't matter. My kids are going private but I will help with the charge to get this done. The Chevy Chase community has been screwed a second time. Bye bye housing values. Thanks RCF! You also screwed yourselves, your values will go down too. The board just set precedent. Proximity is what matters. Time for the RHPS bussing experiment to die, even if it means taking MCPS to court. Yes, I am bitter.
whoa. why don't you have some wine or maybe smoke something, or mother's little helper?
Your housing values are not going down because of this.
You have no chance in court.
You are free to leave for private school but leave us out of your little revenge scenario.
Many of us are still happy with the schools, including the current k-2/3-5 split.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So instead of balancing capacity and demographics NOW, they kicked the can down 5 years. Then we hear it wasn't REALLY about proximity, it was more about articulation? They will be isolated? Not buying it. They are "saving" space at Westland for Pyle kids that has no additional space. Where in the regulations does it say that is a factor? Also, I feel that the board didn't want to disrespect Dr Smith and went with his recommendation.
I saw board members go directly at the superintendent in last nights meeting. Especially Kaufmann..
Anonymous wrote:So instead of balancing capacity and demographics NOW, they kicked the can down 5 years. Then we hear it wasn't REALLY about proximity, it was more about articulation? They will be isolated? Not buying it. They are "saving" space at Westland for Pyle kids that has no additional space. Where in the regulations does it say that is a factor? Also, I feel that the board didn't want to disrespect Dr Smith and went with his recommendation.
Anonymous wrote:Time to split RHPS CCES NCC. Enough of bussing our little kids if equity doesn't matter. My kids are going private but I will help with the charge to get this done. The Chevy Chase community has been screwed a second time. Bye bye housing values. Thanks RCF! You also screwed yourselves, your values will go down too. The board just set precedent. Proximity is what matters. Time for the RHPS bussing experiment to die, even if it means taking MCPS to court. Yes, I am bitter.
Anonymous wrote:So instead of balancing capacity and demographics NOW, they kicked the can down 5 years. Then we hear it wasn't REALLY about proximity, it was more about articulation? They will be isolated? Not buying it. They are "saving" space at Westland for Pyle kids that has no additional space. Where in the regulations does it say that is a factor? Also, I feel that the board didn't want to disrespect Dr Smith and went with his recommendation.
Anonymous wrote:So instead of balancing capacity and demographics NOW, they kicked the can down 5 years. Then we hear it wasn't REALLY about proximity, it was more about articulation? They will be isolated? Not buying it. They are "saving" space at Westland for Pyle kids that has no additional space. Where in the regulations does it say that is a factor? Also, I feel that the board didn't want to disrespect Dr Smith and went with his recommendation.
1) Demographic characteristics of student population
2) Geographic proximity of communities to schools
3) Stability of school assignments over time
4) Facility utilization