Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two new articles today in WaPo's Metro section.
Links? Having difficultly finding them.
My mistake! I still read the print version and must have read Saturday's saved version this morning. Her is the story:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/real-estate-decisions-imperil-dc-mayors-ambitious-plan-for-homeless-families/2016/04/17/6bb6291c-00c4-11e6-b823-707c79ce3504_story.html?tid=hybrid_content_1_na
There also was a piece on the adverse health implications--primarily asthma--of the proposed Ward 5 location.
Ugh. Getting worse by the day. Will Bowser finish her first mandate?
Anonymous wrote:Article in the DC City Paper today discusses how homeless advocacy groups are now criticizing Bowser's proposal too. Among their complaint, they say Bowser and her team should focus on sites already owned by DC Government, as opposed to those ridiculously overpriced lease deals.
Bowser's team has claimed in the past that there aren't any suitable city-owned sites. That's just BS. Here is a map. http://geospatial.dcgis.dc.gov/DCProperty/maplocatesearch.aspx
If you click on the "i" button for information, and zoom in to any part of the city and box in a handful of dots, you can easily get a listing with info on a variety of buildings. Lots of them are DC city parks or traffic circles, but I know some of the ones in areas I frequent are buildings sitting vacant, or are used only infrequently when the city rents them out for private functions, so they should be available for renovation into residential sites for the homeless.
Why is Bowser leasing more property when DC already has dozens - maybe even hundreds - of empty buildings it owns?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another option: Renovate some of DC's vacant school buildings to use them as shelters. If they're school buildings, they're already in residential neighborhoods. If they're vacant, they're better used as shelters than left empty.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/vacant-dc-school-buildings-could-house-public-charters/2012/04/03/gIQAt1KBuS_story.html
Umm, charters are supposed to have first dibs on unused school buildings.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Another option: Renovate some of DC's vacant school buildings to use them as shelters. If they're school buildings, they're already in residential neighborhoods. If they're vacant, they're better used as shelters than left empty.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/vacant-dc-school-buildings-could-house-public-charters/2012/04/03/gIQAt1KBuS_story.html
Anonymous wrote:Ugh, we live near one of the new proposed cites. Hooray for my property values and my kids' safety going down the drain.
Anonymous wrote:Article in the DC City Paper today discusses how homeless advocacy groups are now criticizing Bowser's proposal too. Among their complaint, they say Bowser and her team should focus on sites already owned by DC Government, as opposed to those ridiculously overpriced lease deals.
Bowser's team has claimed in the past that there aren't any suitable city-owned sites. That's just BS. Here is a map. http://geospatial.dcgis.dc.gov/DCProperty/maplocatesearch.aspx
If you click on the "i" button for information, and zoom in to any part of the city and box in a handful of dots, you can easily get a listing with info on a variety of buildings. Lots of them are DC city parks or traffic circles, but I know some of the ones in areas I frequent are buildings sitting vacant, or are used only infrequently when the city rents them out for private functions, so they should be available for renovation into residential sites for the homeless.
Why is Bowser leasing more property when DC already has dozens - maybe even hundreds - of empty buildings it owns?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two new articles today in WaPo's Metro section.
Links? Having difficultly finding them.
My mistake! I still read the print version and must have read Saturday's saved version this morning. Her is the story:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/real-estate-decisions-imperil-dc-mayors-ambitious-plan-for-homeless-families/2016/04/17/6bb6291c-00c4-11e6-b823-707c79ce3504_story.html?tid=hybrid_content_1_na
There also was a piece on the adverse health implications--primarily asthma--of the proposed Ward 5 location.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two new articles today in WaPo's Metro section.
Links? Having difficultly finding them.