Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Bullis has a very deep senior class this year. After this season, the talent level will drop off significantly.
Aren't they still heavily recruiting? I also think success breeds success. No, not a Bullis parent. Just another IAC parent wishing my school would follow Bullis's recruitment strategy.
I don't see why they won't continue to recruit -- lacrosse makes sense for them. It brings in full-paying students and adds some Ivy League college destinations to their college list. Football and basketball -- which Bullis emphasizes greatly -- are much higher profile spectator sports and in the main sports media. But lacrosse and ice hockey in this area bring in a lot of full payers. I would not be surprise to see an increased emphasis on ice hockey for Bullis as well (as has been the case at Landon).
The Bullis Head of School was open about his strategy to use a very high profile sports program to raise the school's overall profile and build excitement. I don't know if that is sustainable long term but hats off to him, it certainly seems to have worked very well for Bullis thus far.
The parent who wants his school to "follow Bullis's recruitment strategy" has to think about whether it makes sense for his school. Are they trying to explicitly emphasize sports more? Are they willing to commit admissions slots and financial aid money to athletes, if necessary at the expense of admissions spots and money for other candidates? Are they willing to put in a place a very comprehensive tutoring and academic help program (if they don't already have that?) -- Bullis puts a ton of resources into helping these athletes and other students with learning issues navigate through high school.
You can't just pick and choose -- again, to Bullis's credit, when you see a winning lacrosse team you are seeing just the tip of the iceberg that goes below the surface and dominates most aspects of school life. And it has to make sense as a strategy for your school.