Anonymous wrote:Women shouldn't be in combat, because research shows they lower effectiveness. That is the alpha and the omega. (I'm a woman btw).
Anonymous wrote:Women shouldn't have to be in combat because women have never started a war. Men start wars and kill people frequently. Just watch the news. The business of killing is a male oriented business and for a reason.
Anonymous wrote:Women shouldn't have to be in combat because women have never started a war. Men start wars and kill people frequently. Just watch the news. The business of killing is a male oriented business and for a reason.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of women in the military in combat roles will be the same as lots of women entering any industry or job category. The profession will become "feminized" and will lose status. The more women overtake the military, the less the military will be seen as a desirable profession by males.
Does any serious person believe that a feminized military force will be an effective fighting force? No, no one believes that.
The average amount of weight an infantryman has to carry is 91 pounds. There are only a microscopic percentage of women who will ever be capable of that type of physical labor, no matter how much they train.
Women simply aren't capable of the job.
Anonymous wrote:
Says you? I don't agree that equality is not always everything it is cracked up to be. Those words can only be spoken by someone who doesn't have to worry about being equal. I do think women should register for the draft. I do know that we haven't had a draft since the 1970's. I do know that there have been enough people to cover the demand for military personnel so it's likely that no one will be drafted - neither men nor women. I do find the attitude toward woman in this thread really sad. There is a lot of anger and resentment toward women. Just starting the thread was a provocative gesture and could be construed as a desire to incite fear and anger.
Anonymous wrote:Ultimately if there is true equality in the military combat arms branches women will be tested and measured with precise equality by the realities of warfare.
They will measure up or they will die--just like the men.
Equality is not always everything it is cracked up to be.
Anonymous wrote:Ultimately if there is true equality in the military combat arms branches women will be tested and measured with precise equality by the realities of warfare.
They will measure up or they will die--just like the men.
Equality is not always everything it is cracked up to be.
Anonymous wrote:Ultimately if there is true equality in the military combat arms branches women will be tested and measured with precise equality by the realities of warfare.
They will measure up or they will die--just like the men.
Equality is not always everything it is cracked up to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Liudmyla Mykhailivna Pavlychenko Credited with 309 kills, she is regarded as the most successful female sniper in history
which war?
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me if all jobs are being opened up for women, will women be graded on the same scale as men? The reason I ask this is because for the service academies and for example the FBI, the pft for both has completely different standards/scales for men and women.
There shouldn't be different standards because the standards are derived from requirements of the mission and those requirements shouldn't change based on who is taking the test.
that has never made any sense to me.