An *actual* Holocaust expert weighs in, and declares Ben Carson to be full of hot air:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/15/opinion/ben-cars...olocaust.html?ref=opinion&_r=0
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ HELLOOOOOO Cognitive dissonance there? Justice DID cite the charges and Gibson DID acknowledge wrongdoing and DID agree to change its ways.
That totally goes against your narrative that it was baseless and that Gibson did no wrong and that Gibson "got its wood back" and that Gibson was allowed to go on with its business just as before.
Clearly none of that is the case.
That's called a settlement. If you go in, guns blazing - twice, no less - you'd best be ready to file charges. This was blackmail. Gestapo techniques
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ HELLOOOOOO Cognitive dissonance there? Justice DID cite the charges and Gibson DID acknowledge wrongdoing and DID agree to change its ways.
That totally goes against your narrative that it was baseless and that Gibson did no wrong and that Gibson "got its wood back" and that Gibson was allowed to go on with its business just as before.
Clearly none of that is the case.
That's called a settlement. If you go in, guns blazing - twice, no less - you'd best be ready to file charges. This was blackmail. Gestapo techniques
Anonymous wrote:Oh, please, there were no "guns blazing."
If it were truly such an open-and-shut slam dunk for Gibson that they did no wrongdoing, they would have nailed it in the courts.
You don't admit wrongdoing when you did no wrong.