Anonymous wrote:No ,it does not work that way. If you were a member you would know this. I will also add that if you were a member of any of the older clubs in the US. It absolutely is based on lineage,connections, and ancestry. Which is why the new money wants to be a part of it.
(I actually used to be a server at Chevy Chase Club about 10 years ago, actually)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No ,it does not work that way. If you were a member you would know this. I will also add that if you were a member of any of the older clubs in the US. It absolutely is based on lineage,connections, and ancestry. Which is why the new money wants to be a part of it.
Everything about this makes me happy that I don't waste my money on this club. Let the family membership drop a generation ago and God bless Dad for that choice.
Anonymous wrote:No ,it does not work that way. If you were a member you would know this. I will also add that if you were a member of any of the older clubs in the US. It absolutely is based on lineage,connections, and ancestry. Which is why the new money wants to be a part of it.
Anonymous wrote:No they do not "deserve" to be there. Not sure anyone at the club would ever use that term. Ruining the view... Well... We might have another way of putting it.
Anonymous wrote:There is a certain amount of new money at Chevy and there are many of us who would like to see it go.... Not because it is new ,but because it often comes attached to unattractive people. Board does not care....enough. I hope they see this post! As for the kids they are just romping around like kids anywhere....that are unsupervised

Anonymous wrote:19:25. You have way too much time. As a Bethesda has been, I thought CC was a bit lower end. Back in the day, it was Congressional that had the clout. Kenwood is like the local Y....drop your kids off for swim team and a lunch at the snack bar. CC was not happening. No personality. Congressional was where the old money was...no Georgetown (catholic) types.....high end waspy government types with wispy offspring who did not need to prove anything.
There goes the neighborhood!
That's mean
Catholic bashing will get you nowhere. WASPs in my G'town 'hood are cold & unwelcoming; it's the Catholics who are warm and helpful. I guess because they were here 'first' & do not feel threatened by false spinoffs of their church
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:19:25. You have way too much time. As a Bethesda has been, I thought CC was a bit lower end. Back in the day, it was Congressional that had the clout. Kenwood is like the local Y....drop your kids off for swim team and a lunch at the snack bar. CC was not happening. No personality. Congressional was where the old money was...no Georgetown (catholic) types.....high end waspy government types with wispy offspring who did not need to prove anything.
There goes the neighborhood!
![]()
You know your phrase contradicts itself, right? One gets to be snobbish if they are a government worker? For reals?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:19:25. You have way too much time. As a Bethesda has been, I thought CC was a bit lower end. Back in the day, it was Congressional that had the clout. Kenwood is like the local Y....drop your kids off for swim team and a lunch at the snack bar. CC was not happening. No personality. Congressional was where the old money was...no Georgetown (catholic) types.....high end waspy government types with wispy offspring who did not need to prove anything.
There goes the neighborhood!
That's mean
Catholic bashing will get you nowhere. WASPs in my G'town 'hood are cold & unwelcoming; it's the Catholics who are warm and helpful. I guess because they were here 'first' & do not feel threatened by false spinoffs of their church
Can we stop calling them WASPs if they aren't acting like real Christians? I think that term is misused a lot on DCUM. Why not call the WASA's? A=athiest. Just sayin'.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/reliable-source/wp/2015/05/27/tony-chevy-chase-club-to-parents-your-kids-are-brats/?hpid=z4
Free range parenting for the 1%?