Anonymous wrote: it was amusing to see people bash those who pay their housekeeper 55,000 in the other thread
Do they even know their are postdoc slaves that work at least 60 hours a week for 35,000 without benefits???

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:500k, physician, 29 yo
Lier from money and finances already here![]()
It's not even the person who earns 500k it's his 40 yo wife lol
Yeah, as someone pointed out in another forum, what kind of doctor makes $500k after a 3-year residency in the DC area. It doesn't add up.
It takes so many more years of training for a higher-earning specialty: e.g. invasive cardiology, interventional radiology, surgery, etc...
Also, doctors often get paid more in smaller cities where there's less competition.
Anonymous wrote:There are benefits ( like only being taxed on the salary, not BAH and inexpensive military daycare and of course the pension if you stay for 20) that make it livable, but it isn't "cushy".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment about military spending being too high is laughable.
Why?
I agree that military spending is generally too high, but military salaries are not. Look up what an E-2 or E-3 is making. These are the men and women who put their lives at risk and they make less than if they'd chosen to work at McDonalds. They also are not the recipients of pensions (have to committ to 20 years for a pension, only 17% across the military do that) or any sort of retirement matching. But BAH (housing allowance), salary freezes, commissary privileges, medical care, etc. are always first on the defense budget chopping block rather than their wasteful contracts for equipment that will never be used. It's shameful.
The actual salary # might not be too high, but the tax benefits, housing allowance, food, etc add up to a cushy situation for some.
If it was so cushy, there would be a lot more than 17% of military members across the board staying for a 20 year career. The housing allowance just makes up for the shamefully low salaries that we pay our military members. I find the separate BAH insulting, actually. What other job dictates how much you should be spending on housing? My BAH with dependents for the DC region is $2400 a month - that is supposed to cover housing, utilities, food, etc. Yeah right in this area with a family of 4! But we make it work because I love my job and think it is important. A large chunk of my salary makes up the difference.
What's your salary before BAH?
$32,000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment about military spending being too high is laughable.
Why?
I agree that military spending is generally too high, but military salaries are not. Look up what an E-2 or E-3 is making. These are the men and women who put their lives at risk and they make less than if they'd chosen to work at McDonalds. They also are not the recipients of pensions (have to committ to 20 years for a pension, only 17% across the military do that) or any sort of retirement matching. But BAH (housing allowance), salary freezes, commissary privileges, medical care, etc. are always first on the defense budget chopping block rather than their wasteful contracts for equipment that will never be used. It's shameful.
The actual salary # might not be too high, but the tax benefits, housing allowance, food, etc add up to a cushy situation for some.
If it was so cushy, there would be a lot more than 17% of military members across the board staying for a 20 year career. The housing allowance just makes up for the shamefully low salaries that we pay our military members. I find the separate BAH insulting, actually. What other job dictates how much you should be spending on housing? My BAH with dependents for the DC region is $2400 a month - that is supposed to cover housing, utilities, food, etc. Yeah right in this area with a family of 4! But we make it work because I love my job and think it is important. A large chunk of my salary makes up the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment about military spending being too high is laughable.
Why?
I agree that military spending is generally too high, but military salaries are not. Look up what an E-2 or E-3 is making. These are the men and women who put their lives at risk and they make less than if they'd chosen to work at McDonalds. They also are not the recipients of pensions (have to committ to 20 years for a pension, only 17% across the military do that) or any sort of retirement matching. But BAH (housing allowance), salary freezes, commissary privileges, medical care, etc. are always first on the defense budget chopping block rather than their wasteful contracts for equipment that will never be used. It's shameful.
The actual salary # might not be too high, but the tax benefits, housing allowance, food, etc add up to a cushy situation for some.
If it was so cushy, there would be a lot more than 17% of military members across the board staying for a 20 year career. The housing allowance just makes up for the shamefully low salaries that we pay our military members. I find the separate BAH insulting, actually. What other job dictates how much you should be spending on housing? My BAH with dependents for the DC region is $2400 a month - that is supposed to cover housing, utilities, food, etc. Yeah right in this area with a family of 4! But we make it work because I love my job and think it is important. A large chunk of my salary makes up the difference.
What's your salary before BAH?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment about military spending being too high is laughable.
Why?
I agree that military spending is generally too high, but military salaries are not. Look up what an E-2 or E-3 is making. These are the men and women who put their lives at risk and they make less than if they'd chosen to work at McDonalds. They also are not the recipients of pensions (have to committ to 20 years for a pension, only 17% across the military do that) or any sort of retirement matching. But BAH (housing allowance), salary freezes, commissary privileges, medical care, etc. are always first on the defense budget chopping block rather than their wasteful contracts for equipment that will never be used. It's shameful.
The actual salary # might not be too high, but the tax benefits, housing allowance, food, etc add up to a cushy situation for some.
If it was so cushy, there would be a lot more than 17% of military members across the board staying for a 20 year career. The housing allowance just makes up for the shamefully low salaries that we pay our military members. I find the separate BAH insulting, actually. What other job dictates how much you should be spending on housing? My BAH with dependents for the DC region is $2400 a month - that is supposed to cover housing, utilities, food, etc. Yeah right in this area with a family of 4! But we make it work because I love my job and think it is important. A large chunk of my salary makes up the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:240K Software Consultant, mid 30s w/ MS in Software
Since you are a consultant, I assume you have no benefits? Are you 1099 or W-2? (i.e., self employment tax). I am just curious. 240K seems high as a W-2 with good benefits, but reasonable if a 1099.
W2 but I work 50-60 hours a week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The comment about military spending being too high is laughable.
Why?
I agree that military spending is generally too high, but military salaries are not. Look up what an E-2 or E-3 is making. These are the men and women who put their lives at risk and they make less than if they'd chosen to work at McDonalds. They also are not the recipients of pensions (have to committ to 20 years for a pension, only 17% across the military do that) or any sort of retirement matching. But BAH (housing allowance), salary freezes, commissary privileges, medical care, etc. are always first on the defense budget chopping block rather than their wasteful contracts for equipment that will never be used. It's shameful.
The actual salary # might not be too high, but the tax benefits, housing allowance, food, etc add up to a cushy situation for some.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:35 non-profit operations admin 50K
DH 47-DC cop, base salary is 72K with overtime about 100k.
That is outrageous. I don't agree with the comments about federal salaries but for a local cop that's borderline corruption.
Does he even have a BA?
Wow, really? Does it MATTER if he has a college degree? I hope you realize being a police officer isn't a Monday to Friday 9-5 job. I'm sure quite a bit of the "overtime" is actually shift differential from working overnight and on weekends when you are home sleeping or hanging out with your friends and family... Borderline corruption? Really?
+10000.
Seriously, you're complaining that someone who literally stands in the line of fire on holidays, snow storms, emergencies, at 3am, whenever, has the opportunity to make overtime??? If he's making 28k in overtime, I can tell you he's busting his ass and doing a TON of overtime (probably an extra 8-10 hour shift per week). Would you work 60+ hours a week, every week, including holidays, with a target on your back, for 100k???
This is a bit much.
I do not at all think that 100k for an experienced officer is to much. Having worked in LE, I also know that many officers are not at all on the street, much less "literally in the line of fire." I also know that much overtime is not spent "busting ass" but killing time on the clock.
The problem is the overtime system. Pay them a solid salary and decrease the dependency on OT. At this point, earning OT is viewed as an entitlement, and not really compensation for important work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:240K Software Consultant, mid 30s w/ MS in Software
Since you are a consultant, I assume you have no benefits? Are you 1099 or W-2? (i.e., self employment tax). I am just curious. 240K seems high as a W-2 with good benefits, but reasonable if a 1099.