Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I taught for 12 years. My principal always insisted that the research does not support the idea that smaller classes are more effective. (I don't know that he believed it, though.)
The reaesrch I have seen has defined large class to be in the 24-27 student range, not 29-34 (or higher).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is amazing. You'd think that it would be uncontroversial to say that 37 students is too many in an elementary school class. Apparently not.
That part is not controversial. I don't hear anyone arguing that 27 kids in a class is a good thing to be aspired to. The part that is controversial is whether it's ok to give Title I schools fewer children per class. Personally, I'm shocked that parents really think the solution to the problem is to make the Title I class sizes bigger because those parents pay less taxes so that the "rich" McLean students can have smaller classes. As a PP said, Title I schools have some large classes too. Why not make it a districtwide issue and force the district to find the funds somewhere to decrease the class sizes. My kids aren't in Title I schools, either (far from it) and they've had class sizes up to 32. I just have a conscience.
Anonymous wrote:FCPS says that the cost of reducing the elementary class size formula by just .5 student (from 26.75 to 26.25) would be $7.0 million. See page 14 of the attached.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9T8AWB70B1D4/$file/FY2016Responses%20for%20Posting1-28-15.pdf
I imagine this group is not proposing a tax increase, so the funds for this proposal will have to be cut from somewhere else in the budget. Do they actually identify where the money would come from, or is this just a political "we should get more without having to make any hard decisions" deal?
Anonymous wrote:I taught for 12 years. My principal always insisted that the research does not support the idea that smaller classes are more effective. (I don't know that he believed it, though.)
Anonymous wrote:FCPS says that the cost of reducing the elementary class size formula by just .5 student (from 26.75 to 26.25) would be $7.0 million. See page 14 of the attached.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/9T8AWB70B1D4/$file/FY2016Responses%20for%20Posting1-28-15.pdf
I imagine this group is not proposing a tax increase, so the funds for this proposal will have to be cut from somewhere else in the budget. Do they actually identify where the money would come from, or is this just a political "we should get more without having to make any hard decisions" deal?
Anonymous wrote:This thread is amazing. You'd think that it would be uncontroversial to say that 37 students is too many in an elementary school class. Apparently not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you pay more taxes you should have smaller class sizes
And double votes as well.
+1, you should be able to have a say on how your money is spent even more so than the illegal gumming up the schools systems.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you pay more taxes you should have smaller class sizes
And double votes as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smaller class sizes are not the holy grail.
Look at schools in ACPS - average class size in many schools can be under 20 students. In fact, the school that is consistently failing has the smallest class size and has for years.
Does ACPS have as great a range of class sizes though? Can you tell how students grow related to class size? FCPS has classes ranging from 10-37 in the same grade so it's easier to see how reducing class sizes helps. If there is enough research that even with low class sizes, certain students still fail, I think FCPS needs to look at what does help these students succeed and focus on this verses only on class size. And they need to be more transparent about why they've chosen such a disparity in class size from one school to another.
You make it sound like they have a choice to have small class sizes... In at least many of the cases they do not. Title 1 requires the small class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smaller class sizes are not the holy grail.
Look at schools in ACPS - average class size in many schools can be under 20 students. In fact, the school that is consistently failing has the smallest class size and has for years.
Does ACPS have as great a range of class sizes though? Can you tell how students grow related to class size? FCPS has classes ranging from 10-37 in the same grade so it's easier to see how reducing class sizes helps. If there is enough research that even with low class sizes, certain students still fail, I think FCPS needs to look at what does help these students succeed and focus on this verses only on class size. And they need to be more transparent about why they've chosen such a disparity in class size from one school to another.
You make it sound like they have a choice to have small class sizes... In at least many of the cases they do not. Title 1 requires the small class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Smaller class sizes are not the holy grail.
Look at schools in ACPS - average class size in many schools can be under 20 students. In fact, the school that is consistently failing has the smallest class size and has for years.
Does ACPS have as great a range of class sizes though? Can you tell how students grow related to class size? FCPS has classes ranging from 10-37 in the same grade so it's easier to see how reducing class sizes helps. If there is enough research that even with low class sizes, certain students still fail, I think FCPS needs to look at what does help these students succeed and focus on this verses only on class size. And they need to be more transparent about why they've chosen such a disparity in class size from one school to another.