Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."
A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.
You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.![]()
![]()
![]()
Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.
Sleeping with 100 men is unsafe, disgusting, and certainly disrespectful to a future boyfriend or husband. So it deserves to be mocked/shamed, trash.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.
I'm not butthurt at all. I am amused that you obviously think that is a crushing response. In fact it is a lame and ineffectual insult that reveals how limited and predictable your mind is.
I really couldn't care less that she's a skanky old ho who lets countless men pump and dump her. Why are you all butthurt about me calling it as I see it?
he says as he stands in line waiting for his turn...or at least it sure sounds as though you know about this sort of thing first hand.
Do you not see the disconnect in your thinking? Why are you calling this woman names when you are really just birds of a feather?
1. I would not touch that creature with a ten foot pole while wearing a biohazard suit. She is a public toilet that countless men have dropped trou and used. Reeeeeevolting!
2. No disconnect. I am calling her what she openly admits she is. Meanwhile the poster has taken umbrage is simply making up stupidities in a futile effort to insult me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.
I'm not butthurt at all. I am amused that you obviously think that is a crushing response. In fact it is a lame and ineffectual insult that reveals how limited and predictable your mind is.
I really couldn't care less that she's a skanky old ho who lets countless men pump and dump her. Why are you all butthurt about me calling it as I see it?
he says as he stands in line waiting for his turn...or at least it sure sounds as though you know about this sort of thing first hand.
Do you not see the disconnect in your thinking? Why are you calling this woman names when you are really just birds of a feather?
1. I would not touch that creature with a ten foot pole while wearing a biohazard suit. She is a public toilet that countless men have dropped trou and used. Reeeeeevolting!
2. No disconnect. I am calling her what she openly admits she is. Meanwhile the poster has taken umbrage is simply making up stupidities in a futile effort to insult me.
It's not her job to live up to your standards. The fact that you feel the need to degrade and shame her is a little....disturbing. You sound angry.
+1

Messed around a lot in High School and early college before meeting DH, but never went "all the way".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.
I'm not butthurt at all. I am amused that you obviously think that is a crushing response. In fact it is a lame and ineffectual insult that reveals how limited and predictable your mind is.
I really couldn't care less that she's a skanky old ho who lets countless men pump and dump her. Why are you all butthurt about me calling it as I see it?
he says as he stands in line waiting for his turn...or at least it sure sounds as though you know about this sort of thing first hand.
Do you not see the disconnect in your thinking? Why are you calling this woman names when you are really just birds of a feather?
1. I would not touch that creature with a ten foot pole while wearing a biohazard suit. She is a public toilet that countless men have dropped trou and used. Reeeeeevolting!
2. No disconnect. I am calling her what she openly admits she is. Meanwhile the poster has taken umbrage is simply making up stupidities in a futile effort to insult me.
It's not her job to live up to your standards. The fact that you feel the need to degrade and shame her is a little....disturbing. You sound angry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.
I'm not butthurt at all. I am amused that you obviously think that is a crushing response. In fact it is a lame and ineffectual insult that reveals how limited and predictable your mind is.
I really couldn't care less that she's a skanky old ho who lets countless men pump and dump her. Why are you all butthurt about me calling it as I see it?
he says as he stands in line waiting for his turn...or at least it sure sounds as though you know about this sort of thing first hand.
Do you not see the disconnect in your thinking? Why are you calling this woman names when you are really just birds of a feather?
1. I would not touch that creature with a ten foot pole while wearing a biohazard suit. She is a public toilet that countless men have dropped trou and used. Reeeeeevolting!
2. No disconnect. I am calling her what she openly admits she is. Meanwhile the poster has taken umbrage is simply making up stupidities in a futile effort to insult me.
Anonymous wrote:I literally stopped counting after 30
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.
I'm not butthurt at all. I am amused that you obviously think that is a crushing response. In fact it is a lame and ineffectual insult that reveals how limited and predictable your mind is.
I really couldn't care less that she's a skanky old ho who lets countless men pump and dump her. Why are you all butthurt about me calling it as I see it?
he says as he stands in line waiting for his turn...or at least it sure sounds as though you know about this sort of thing first hand.
Do you not see the disconnect in your thinking? Why are you calling this woman names when you are really just birds of a feather?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So impressed with all the women that have slept with other women. I wish I had done that. How did it happen?
I want to sleep with a women too. Always wanted to, just don't know how to go about finding someone.
Interesting that so many women on this thread are saying this. Not something that I've ever wanted to do - I'm not attracted to women. But to each her own.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So impressed with all the women that have slept with other women. I wish I had done that. How did it happen?
I want to sleep with a women too. Always wanted to, just don't know how to go about finding someone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went through my wild, crazy, single, don't want to be tied down days...but some of these numbers are just mind boggling to me. Do you never see the same man twice? You think that's sexy? Really?
Sexy to who? Sexy to me? or sexy for future partners? Obviously, if I'm doing it, it's because I want to do it. My husband of 21 years doesn't have an issue with numbers, so it's obviously not a detriment to my long term numbers.
I'm not at 100, but 100 is not that high. If you are sexually active from age 18 to 28 and have one anonymous hook-up per month, you will end up with 120 partners over that period. That's one frat party or bar night a month.
And this person would have anonymous sex for ten straight years, never having a relationship? That is far from normal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."
A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.
You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.![]()
![]()
![]()
Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.
Sleeping with 100 men is unsafe, disgusting, and certainly disrespectful to a future boyfriend or husband. So it deserves to be mocked/shamed, trash.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went through my wild, crazy, single, don't want to be tied down days...but some of these numbers are just mind boggling to me. Do you never see the same man twice? You think that's sexy? Really?
Sexy to who? Sexy to me? or sexy for future partners? Obviously, if I'm doing it, it's because I want to do it. My husband of 21 years doesn't have an issue with numbers, so it's obviously not a detriment to my long term numbers.
I'm not at 100, but 100 is not that high. If you are sexually active from age 18 to 28 and have one anonymous hook-up per month, you will end up with 120 partners over that period. That's one frat party or bar night a month.