Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much misandry on this thread.
Yeah right, and I am someone that can't stand when other women - and some men - put men down. Posters are easily telling OP how much of a horrible whore she is and never deserves to see her kids.....how many times in threads where OP is a woman talking about her cheating husband do posters say he should never see the kids? Not as much as in this thread.
Above poster is correct. What stands out about this thread was the malicious, targeted way posters are addressing OP, specifically around her gender and sexuality. Her behavior makes her a cheater. A bad spouse and possibly a bad parent. Same nouns one can use for a cheating DH. Posters repeatedly referring to OP as a "whore" and suggesting she lose custody of her kids are coming from an entirely different place. And it's not a good one.
She lost custody because she can't afford to support her kids not because she is a whore. It's because she expects her ex-h to support her even though she has an Ivy League education. She makes $20k a year and refuses to get a real job.
+1. Folks need to read carefully because the unbelievable lack of judgement by OP (not the covert affair part but running to move in with the OM) is what could be the nail in the coffin. That her H is asking for details - that's understandable as some PPs noted due to the fact that he's destroyed by this revelation. That he wants an 'open marriage' or for OP to perform on him as she did with then ON, well that's what OP says and it's coming from someone with with little credibility.
Do you think she deserves, based on behavior, to have her girls? She can't support herself, the girls apparently hate her and at the first sign of trouble (i.e., being caught and kicked out the of the house) what did she do? Does that sound like someone with her shit together? And she think her H is being too mean. wow.
As one PP mentioned, if OP was a man, what you'll be your reaction?
Children aren't pawns.
They have a right to contact with their mother. The gender of the offending parent doesn't matter. How selfish are you that you think cutting a kid's mother out of her life is the solution to infidelity? That's messed up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Moving in with the lover won't help her cause much. I don't blame the kids for not really wanting to hang out with OP all that much.
Now if the husband takes her back and proceeds to treat her like complete dirt, OP can paint her husband as abusive/fucked in the head (or some polite, court-approved method of stating that.)
Asking OP to take it up the pooper won't cut it for abusive/fucked in the head territory, nor will asking OP to compose Penthouse Forum letters based on her real life experiences.
Taking OP up the pooper without her consent, NOW we're getting into abusive/fucked in the head (and worse) territory.
wow. such hate for this woman.
Anonymous wrote:Moving in with the lover won't help her cause much. I don't blame the kids for not really wanting to hang out with OP all that much.
Now if the husband takes her back and proceeds to treat her like complete dirt, OP can paint her husband as abusive/fucked in the head (or some polite, court-approved method of stating that.)
Asking OP to take it up the pooper won't cut it for abusive/fucked in the head territory, nor will asking OP to compose Penthouse Forum letters based on her real life experiences.
Taking OP up the pooper without her consent, NOW we're getting into abusive/fucked in the head (and worse) territory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much misandry on this thread.
Yeah right, and I am someone that can't stand when other women - and some men - put men down. Posters are easily telling OP how much of a horrible whore she is and never deserves to see her kids.....how many times in threads where OP is a woman talking about her cheating husband do posters say he should never see the kids? Not as much as in this thread.
Above poster is correct. What stands out about this thread was the malicious, targeted way posters are addressing OP, specifically around her gender and sexuality. Her behavior makes her a cheater. A bad spouse and possibly a bad parent. Same nouns one can use for a cheating DH. Posters repeatedly referring to OP as a "whore" and suggesting she lose custody of her kids are coming from an entirely different place. And it's not a good one.
She lost custody because she can't afford to support her kids not because she is a whore. It's because she expects her ex-h to support her even though she has an Ivy League education. She makes $20k a year and refuses to get a real job.
Why should it come down to money? Suppose it was her breadwinner husband who cheated and left. In that case, she wouldn't have been able to support her kids, either. Do you think the cheating husband should have had custody just because he's the one with the paycheck?
Mind you, I am not saying that she should have custody, we simply don't know enough to make that call. I am saying that it should not come down to who can afford what.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much misandry on this thread.
Yeah right, and I am someone that can't stand when other women - and some men - put men down. Posters are easily telling OP how much of a horrible whore she is and never deserves to see her kids.....how many times in threads where OP is a woman talking about her cheating husband do posters say he should never see the kids? Not as much as in this thread.
Above poster is correct. What stands out about this thread was the malicious, targeted way posters are addressing OP, specifically around her gender and sexuality. Her behavior makes her a cheater. A bad spouse and possibly a bad parent. Same nouns one can use for a cheating DH. Posters repeatedly referring to OP as a "whore" and suggesting she lose custody of her kids are coming from an entirely different place. And it's not a good one.
She lost custody because she can't afford to support her kids not because she is a whore. It's because she expects her ex-h to support her even though she has an Ivy League education. She makes $20k a year and refuses to get a real job.
Anonymous wrote:
My reaction would be that a cheating spouse has a right to his or her kids despite actions towards the spouse. Linking the two is never okay and very vindictive. I had a mom who was a good wife but not the best mother figure and a dad who was a great father but not a good husband. I think you can be one and not the other at times.
Anonymous wrote:Let's make OP a man. Now give him advice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much misandry on this thread.
Yeah right, and I am someone that can't stand when other women - and some men - put men down. Posters are easily telling OP how much of a horrible whore she is and never deserves to see her kids.....how many times in threads where OP is a woman talking about her cheating husband do posters say he should never see the kids? Not as much as in this thread.
Above poster is correct. What stands out about this thread was the malicious, targeted way posters are addressing OP, specifically around her gender and sexuality. Her behavior makes her a cheater. A bad spouse and possibly a bad parent. Same nouns one can use for a cheating DH. Posters repeatedly referring to OP as a "whore" and suggesting she lose custody of her kids are coming from an entirely different place. And it's not a good one.
She lost custody because she can't afford to support her kids not because she is a whore. It's because she expects her ex-h to support her even though she has an Ivy League education. She makes $20k a year and refuses to get a real job.
+1. Folks need to read carefully because the unbelievable lack of judgement by OP (not the covert affair part but running to move in with the OM) is what could be the nail in the coffin. That her H is asking for details - that's understandable as some PPs noted due to the fact that he's destroyed by this revelation. That he wants an 'open marriage' or for OP to perform on him as she did with then ON, well that's what OP says and it's coming from someone with with little credibility.
Do you think she deserves, based on behavior, to have her girls? She can't support herself, the girls apparently hate her and at the first sign of trouble (i.e., being caught and kicked out the of the house) what did she do? Does that sound like someone with her shit together? And she think her H is being too mean. wow.
As one PP mentioned, if OP was a man, what you'll be your reaction?
Children aren't pawns.
They have a right to contact with their mother. The gender of the offending parent doesn't matter. How selfish are you that you think cutting a kid's mother out of her life is the solution to infidelity? That's messed up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much misandry on this thread.
Yeah right, and I am someone that can't stand when other women - and some men - put men down. Posters are easily telling OP how much of a horrible whore she is and never deserves to see her kids.....how many times in threads where OP is a woman talking about her cheating husband do posters say he should never see the kids? Not as much as in this thread.
Above poster is correct. What stands out about this thread was the malicious, targeted way posters are addressing OP, specifically around her gender and sexuality. Her behavior makes her a cheater. A bad spouse and possibly a bad parent. Same nouns one can use for a cheating DH. Posters repeatedly referring to OP as a "whore" and suggesting she lose custody of her kids are coming from an entirely different place. And it's not a good one.
She lost custody because she can't afford to support her kids not because she is a whore. It's because she expects her ex-h to support her even though she has an Ivy League education. She makes $20k a year and refuses to get a real job.
+1. Folks need to read carefully because the unbelievable lack of judgement by OP (not the covert affair part but running to move in with the OM) is what could be the nail in the coffin. That her H is asking for details - that's understandable as some PPs noted due to the fact that he's destroyed by this revelation. That he wants an 'open marriage' or for OP to perform on him as she did with then ON, well that's what OP says and it's coming from someone with with little credibility.
Do you think she deserves, based on behavior, to have her girls? She can't support herself, the girls apparently hate her and at the first sign of trouble (i.e., being caught and kicked out the of the house) what did she do? Does that sound like someone with her shit together? And she think her H is being too mean. wow.
As one PP mentioned, if OP was a man, what you'll be your reaction?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So much misandry on this thread.
Yeah right, and I am someone that can't stand when other women - and some men - put men down. Posters are easily telling OP how much of a horrible whore she is and never deserves to see her kids.....how many times in threads where OP is a woman talking about her cheating husband do posters say he should never see the kids? Not as much as in this thread.
Above poster is correct. What stands out about this thread was the malicious, targeted way posters are addressing OP, specifically around her gender and sexuality. Her behavior makes her a cheater. A bad spouse and possibly a bad parent. Same nouns one can use for a cheating DH. Posters repeatedly referring to OP as a "whore" and suggesting she lose custody of her kids are coming from an entirely different place. And it's not a good one.
She lost custody because she can't afford to support her kids not because she is a whore. It's because she expects her ex-h to support her even though she has an Ivy League education. She makes $20k a year and refuses to get a real job.
+1. Folks need to read carefully because the unbelievable lack of judgement by OP (not the covert affair part but running to move in with the OM) is what could be the nail in the coffin. That her H is asking for details - that's understandable as some PPs noted due to the fact that he's destroyed by this revelation. That he wants an 'open marriage' or for OP to perform on him as she did with then ON, well that's what OP says and it's coming from someone with with little credibility.
Do you think she deserves, based on behavior, to have her girls? She can't support herself, the girls apparently hate her and at the first sign of trouble (i.e., being caught and kicked out the of the house) what did she do? Does that sound like someone with her shit together? And she think her H is being too mean. wow.
As one PP mentioned, if OP was a man, what you'll be your reaction?
Anonymous wrote:OP: your DH is very angry and he is being vindictive. Look back at why you started to the affair in the first place. Perhaps because the DH was a demanding, dull and vindictive sort of guy? Now he wants you to perform certain acts with him? First confess, then do penance? I suspect that the marriage was really over before the affair began. But now you have the legalities to face, and you need to be the mother to your children. He does not have the right to keep the children away from you. You need a lawyer in a BIG way. More even than you need counseling or confession. A lawyer with experience would likely tell you that tit for tat is not going to put the marriage back together again. Like PP said, that part of your life and relationship is over. You are now on new ground, and your DH does not sound like the forgiving type. Stop blaming yourself and start looking out for yourself. Virginia can be a very hard state to divorce in. Be careful.