Sabrina55 wrote:Anonymous wrote:and, for some perspective: I have a stepchild. I mix my money with my spouse's income, and it all goes to our family expenses; housing, food, activities, camp, clothes, etc. Supporting my stepchild--financially and emotionally--was part of the deal when I married my spouse. It's a package deal. I do not 'subtract' expenses for stepchild because I am not biologically related. While I understand why a PP felt that your fiance did not have an "obligation" to support your kids (but did have an obligation to share expenses) I would seriously question why you would want to marry someone who did not view you or your children as family.
You can't help who you love and it really hurts to feel that he can just walk away and move on like nothing happened and not even care, while I am hurt, crushed and questioning myself and for him to doubt that I did love him.
Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier asking about how your kids felt. Thank you for providing their ages, and yes, you did mention the scholarship -- good to hear they're doing well despite this manipulative man in their lives.
Why are you continuing to ask about the financial split? Didn't you already hear from everyone on this board that this guy is BAD for you? I want to support you, but I don't hear resolve to change this situation in your posts. I hear that you want to make it work somehow, and I think the vast majority of advice is that this is not the right man for you.
And I agree with a PP who said not every relationship discussion need to discuss the kids -- but this one sure does!!!! Last time I checked, this was a parent forum. If there was ever a situation where the OP needs to consider the impact on her children, it is this one. I'm sure there are plenty of posters here who saw his or her parent going through something similar and wouldn't wish it upon their own kids. Sheesh!
Anonymous wrote:Sabrina, people already gave you so much good advice, there's not much to add. But I want to tell you something that struck me when I read your comment that even a little contribution is better than nothing. Please understand that him living with you is a COST FOR YOU. Him staying there means you don't have the full use of your home, and you have a loser in your life, occupying a place that should be taken by a man who would care for you and not say cold things like "I'm not supporting children who aren't mine." Now that he is gone, you have the full use of your house, to do with as you please, and you are rid of this loser. I know it hurts to lose someone after four years, but it sounds like you're a good mom and a kind person, so I wish you to find someone who will not make you doubt and feel bad about yourself. A relationship, even without money, is supposed to add to your total happiness, not subtract from it. Good luck to you and kids.
You can't help who you love and it really hurts to feel that he can just walk away and move on like nothing happened and not even care, while I am hurt, crushed and questioning myself and for him to doubt that I did love him
Anonymous wrote:and, for some perspective: I have a stepchild. I mix my money with my spouse's income, and it all goes to our family expenses; housing, food, activities, camp, clothes, etc. Supporting my stepchild--financially and emotionally--was part of the deal when I married my spouse. It's a package deal. I do not 'subtract' expenses for stepchild because I am not biologically related. While I understand why a PP felt that your fiance did not have an "obligation" to support your kids (but did have an obligation to share expenses) I would seriously question why you would want to marry someone who did not view you or your children as family.
Anonymous wrote:Sabrina, like it or not, we are all involved now. I think you need to share the email with us.