Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^ National Defense is a priority, in my mind. Because, without our freedoms and our rights, nothing else matters.

How in the world was Iraq "national defense"? You do know that all those WMD claims were proven to be false.

BTW, if you are ok with more than $1 trillion spent in Iraq, you have no standing to claim you are against wasteful spending. Even if you thought it was a just cause, so much thrown away on military contractors and "nation building"/pay out to various Iraqi factions. Much more money than the VA and IRS are "wasting" together x 10.

Anonymous wrote:^^ National Defense is a priority, in my mind. Because, without our freedoms and our rights, nothing else matters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

It works. Nothing more than a big it project tact was a few months late and you are still talking about it.

In my opinion, spending somewhere around $700 million for this website is not a good use of tax payer money. I know, and I think you probably know, that a project such as this could have been accomplished much more efficiently and for much less.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/11/obamacare-website-gets-47-million-price-hike/

Anonymous wrote:^^ National Defense is a priority, in my mind. Because, without our freedoms and our rights, nothing else matters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

It works. Nothing more than a big it project tact was a few months late and you are still talking about it.

In my opinion, spending somewhere around $700 million for this website is not a good use of tax payer money. I know, and I think you probably know, that a project such as this could have been accomplished much more efficiently and for much less.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/12/11/obamacare-website-gets-47-million-price-hike/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

It works. Nothing more than a big it project tact was a few months late and you are still talking about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

would hope so -- the sequester has been a horrible policy. I'd vote for more money for everything but defense, since their budget is already 5 times what it was pre 9/11.

And, you'd give more money to the VA, as well?

How about all the money wasted on the original ACA federal exchange which failed to function? (not to mention the amount spent to fix the program).

Taxpayers have ample cause for outrage over this administration's incompetent spending decisions.

Yes, I do actually. You are now bordering on cra-cra, you know that right? Are we going to start talking about Obama's birth certificate next?

So, now you resort to calling names and throwing out red herrings?

Alinsky #5