Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not have firsthand knowledge, but piecing together from this thread and what I've read elsewhere on DCUM, it sounds like their charter was threatened recently when the many stories of this dual lottery were not going away, and they reluctantly now are clear that they only have one lottery and do not give language preference (which is the part that is against the charters). If they are still cheating, I'd guess they are risking their charter, but that is basically just a guess given what I've read here and heard elsewhere.
Lamb, like YY, is one of the charter boards darlings. Nothing will happen to them if they continue to circumvent the process and cheat. Are you kidding, the DCUM crowd may do something violent. And, I am a parent of one of these charters.
Wrong. The question put them in jeopardy, so they removed it. You clearly have no firsthand experience with the PCSB,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RE: LAMB, when we applied last year there was a place on the application to indicate whether Spanish was spoken at home (don't remember the exact wording).
I rest my case. LAMB has been told to stop asking that question for separate lotteries, but they have no fear of repercussions. I think I will tell my sister to use my DC address and apply for my niece who resides in Maryland. She's 18 months and live in downtown Silver Spring. If she gets a spot, my sister can drop her off on her way to work. Easy commute
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I do not have firsthand knowledge, but piecing together from this thread and what I've read elsewhere on DCUM, it sounds like their charter was threatened recently when the many stories of this dual lottery were not going away, and they reluctantly now are clear that they only have one lottery and do not give language preference (which is the part that is against the charters). If they are still cheating, I'd guess they are risking their charter, but that is basically just a guess given what I've read here and heard elsewhere.
Lamb, like YY, is one of the charter boards darlings. Nothing will happen to them if they continue to circumvent the process and cheat. Are you kidding, the DCUM crowd may do something violent. And, I am a parent of one of these charters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Your FARMs students are not doing very well on CAS, so I'll take that bet.![]()
Our scores could be better, true, we're working on it. At least we don't dump them onto a non-immersion apartheid track. Oh, but I almost forgot, 2 white kids were dumped there, too, before their furious parents pulled them out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
As long as you're part of the system, you have to play by the rules.
Spare us your holier than thou rant. Get back to me at AP language test time and college acceptances season. That's when our FARMs Spanish and English speakers are going to shine.
Your FARMs students are not doing very well on CAS, so I'll take that bet.![]()
Anonymous wrote:
As long as you're part of the system, you have to play by the rules.
Anonymous wrote:Lamb parent who does care, really cares, among many others.
I turned down a YY PreK spot. Strange school where most of the admins don't even speak the target language, a bilingual kid is hard to find and, yes, few parents seem to care. If DC Charter moves to revoke Lamb's charter, which won't surprise me, many of us here say bring it on. There are dual-immersion public school Spanish programs in this very city with 2 lotteries at a time when the lines between DCPC and DCPS are starting to blur. If DC Charter doesn't want us, maybe DCPS does and we'd be better off under their auspices long-term. Our admins feel strongly enough about keeping the percentage of native speakers high, with parental support, that they don't fear the future.
As long as you're part of the system, you have to play by the rules.
Anonymous wrote:PPs are getting lost in the weeds on lottery issues. The language immersion schools tend to play games in their efforts to enroll bilingual kids because they are stuck between a rock and a hard place where admissons are concerned. With few native speakers on board, such schools aren't in a great position to carry out their missions. They clearly need to form some sort of consortium, with the DCPS programs involved, joining hands to lobby the charter board and city council education committee for the admissions policies they need to raise standards, and they need to do it year in and year out until sensible compromises have been reached. Nearby MoCo offers reasonable models for replacing language immersion drop-outs from K+ which could be replicated in DC, probably with little resistance on the ground. Just because the powers that be aren't biting in 2013 doesn't mean they won't next year, or the year after. The first DC charters didn't come in until the late 90s. It's worth remembering that these schools don't have long histories, so nothing is set in stone. I'd like to see media attention to the issue to build momentum for change.
Anonymous wrote:Ok so YY is a terrible school because a) it makes no effort to attract Chinese speakers, b) it fraudulently gives preference to Chinese speakers or c) it refuses to fraudulently give preference to Chinese speakers. Can someone please clarify? Or maybe it's d) because 20 people on DCUM think it is.
Why go private now. Did the school not measure up?Anonymous wrote: