Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He followed a pedestrian with his car and then got out of the car. He started any altercation that there was.

If the kid was as innocent as being claimed, why wouldn't he have just stopped, talked to the man, offered to call his parents? This kid, it turns out, had numerous problems prior to this incident. It wouldn't matter whether George Zimmerman followed him because George Zimmerman didn't bash the kid's head against the pavement. Also, if Travon did try to get Zimmerman's gun then his fingerprints should be on gun. George Zimmerman was a part of a neighborhood watch and if I were in a strange neighborhood, I would identify myself, whom I was visiting.

Trayvon had previously suspended from school for scribbling on a door at school, being tardy, and having an empty bag that contained marijuana residue.

George Zimmerman has previously been arrested for assault on a police officer and domestic violence (twice).

Why do you mention Trayvon's non-violent offenses at school but not Zimmerman's three violent offenses for which he was arrested?

Anonymous wrote:He followed a pedestrian with his car and then got out of the car. He started any altercation that there was.

If the kid was as innocent as being claimed, why wouldn't he have just stopped, talked to the man, offered to call his parents? This kid, it turns out, had numerous problems prior to this incident. It wouldn't matter whether George Zimmerman followed him because George Zimmerman didn't bash the kid's head against the pavement. Also, if Travon did try to get Zimmerman's gun then his fingerprints should be on gun. George Zimmerman was a part of a neighborhood watch and if I were in a strange neighborhood, I would identify myself, whom I was visiting.

A young man is a boy. You say Tomato, I say toma(h)to

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a related note this was just bad timing, pretty funny though
http://nextgenfmradio.com/2012/03/28/fox-pulls-ben-stiller-neighborhood-watch-film-in-wake-of-martin-incident/

Actually not funny at all. A young man is dead.

I thought he was a boy

He was 17. Call it what you like.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:On a related note this was just bad timing, pretty funny though
http://nextgenfmradio.com/2012/03/28/fox-pulls-ben-stiller-neighborhood-watch-film-in-wake-of-martin-incident/

Actually not funny at all. A young man is dead.

I thought he was a boy

Anonymous wrote:On a related note this was just bad timing, pretty funny though
http://nextgenfmradio.com/2012/03/28/fox-pulls-ben-stiller-neighborhood-watch-film-in-wake-of-martin-incident/

Actually not funny at all. A young man is dead.

On a related note this was just bad timing, pretty funny though
http://nextgenfmradio.com/2012/03/28/fox-pulls-ben-stiller-neighborhood-watch-film-in-wake-of-martin-incident/

Anonymous wrote:It also appears that parts of the police report were created after the fact, and information included to support GZ's claim. It must be beautiful to have the support of the State Attorney behind you because SA is a friend or acquaintance of your father. It is really beautiful when you have connections on the police department because of your wannabe status.

Interesting. Where did you hear this?

I don't care if Trayvon WAS suspended, smoked pot, or stole jewelery. Whatever his past transgressions, he was apparently not engaged in them at the time of the killing. All he was was a black man, walking. Z took one look and decided T was guilty. Z was judge, jury, and executioner. T was "walking fast" AWAY. Z was the aggressor. The simple act of following T makes Z the aggressor in my mind.

If you were a black kid alone on the street at night and some guy was following you like that, don't you think YOU would be scared, too? Why doesn't T have the right to stand HIS ground???

If only the actual police moved as fast as the thought police.

Anonymous wrote:so i can understand, we are supporting someone with an actual record of violence on file as the hero while we bring down the victim with not one criminial record on file correct?

we are ignoring actual filed complaints on zimmerman and are calling trayvon the dangerous one despite no criminal record right? instead we post "suspect" pictures, tweets, and conjure up innuendos of what trayvon possibly was as a person while ignoring what we have on file of what zimmerman was. ok..

Yep, that about sums it up. But these are the same folks who would probably delve into a women's sexual past if she is raped, so I try not to pay them much mind.

so i can understand, we are supporting someone with an actual record of violence on file as the hero while we bring down the victim with not one criminial record on file correct?

we are ignoring actual filed complaints on zimmerman and are calling trayvon the dangerous one despite no criminal record right? instead we post "suspect" pictures, tweets, and conjure up innuendos of what trayvon possibly was as a person while ignoring what we have on file of what zimmerman was. ok..

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the video is pretty damning, I think. He said he had a broken nose and that his head had been slammed into the ground by TM. He looks neatly put together - barely wrinkled.

Yep. Wouldn't you be dishevled, disoriented, have blood on your shirt, SOMETHING?

Does anyone know if Z received any medical treatment that night?

I think the police gave him some first aid, but no injuries serious enough to warrant a hospital visit. I think a huge gash in the back of your head and a broken nose would = hospital visit.

If the police didn't photograph him, they really f'd this thing up.

I also think if he had any sort of head wound, there would have been remnants of dried blood somewhere on him, his clothes or the back of his head. This video shows him looking untouched.