Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
You sound extremely stupid. You know those two students didn’t falsely post that they’re attending MIT. The idea that they would lie about where they’re attending college, in a public post, to their family, friends, and classmates is ludicrous.
Sidwell envy should be studied. You’re exhibit A.
You're the stupid one for believing IG posts.
0 MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.
Idiot.
Read it and weep, loser! 🤣
https://www.instagram.com/sidwellseniors2025/p/DH4jB7SR8Tt/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
You sound extremely stupid. You know those two students didn’t falsely post that they’re attending MIT. The idea that they would lie about where they’re attending college, in a public post, to their family, friends, and classmates is ludicrous.
Sidwell envy should be studied. You’re exhibit A.
Can you please post it here?
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
You sound extremely stupid. You know those two students didn’t falsely post that they’re attending MIT. The idea that they would lie about where they’re attending college, in a public post, to their family, friends, and classmates is ludicrous.
Sidwell envy should be studied. You’re exhibit A.
You're the stupid one for believing IG posts.
0 MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.
Idiot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I will forever never understand why people opt for private school over public if the goal is to get into Ivy. Logically, if you have any brains, being number 1 in your class will count more than being number 100. It follows then, if your kid is way smart and committed, put them in public where they have the best chance of being number 1 and they can look awesome.
I put my kids in private not for college but because I believe for 4 or whatever years, their quality of life will be more enjoyable, they will be less distracted from learning effectively, they will thrive in the environment offered by the school we chose. This is all about MS and HS being a long 7 years and during these 7 years, they aren't going hate their life! In the process, they will have also learned and they will thrive.
If I was hell bent on them only getting through these years in order to end up at Harvard, there is something wrong with me as a parent and person. Life continues after Harvard. Life continues long after college and the 7 years that they have isn't going to make or break their life but it will in these key years, shape them.
That's all private school is - another environment besides public to choose from. How well your kid does academically is up to them but in public, they def have an opportunity to shine brighter than in pvt where the "competition" is higher because everyone is seeking to shine brightest
Wealthy public schools are extremely competitive. You're not just going to stroll in there and zoom to the top of the class without plenty of blood, sweat and tears. Sorry to disrupt your little fantasy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
You sound extremely stupid. You know those two students didn’t falsely post that they’re attending MIT. The idea that they would lie about where they’re attending college, in a public post, to their family, friends, and classmates is ludicrous.
Sidwell envy should be studied. You’re exhibit A.
Anonymous wrote:I will forever never understand why people opt for private school over public if the goal is to get into Ivy. Logically, if you have any brains, being number 1 in your class will count more than being number 100. It follows then, if your kid is way smart and committed, put them in public where they have the best chance of being number 1 and they can look awesome.
I put my kids in private not for college but because I believe for 4 or whatever years, their quality of life will be more enjoyable, they will be less distracted from learning effectively, they will thrive in the environment offered by the school we chose. This is all about MS and HS being a long 7 years and during these 7 years, they aren't going hate their life! In the process, they will have also learned and they will thrive.
If I was hell bent on them only getting through these years in order to end up at Harvard, there is something wrong with me as a parent and person. Life continues after Harvard. Life continues long after college and the 7 years that they have isn't going to make or break their life but it will in these key years, shape them.
That's all private school is - another environment besides public to choose from. How well your kid does academically is up to them but in public, they def have an opportunity to shine brighter than in pvt where the "competition" is higher because everyone is seeking to shine brightest

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
You sound extremely stupid. You know those two students didn’t falsely post that they’re attending MIT. The idea that they would lie about where they’re attending college, in a public post, to their family, friends, and classmates is ludicrous.
Sidwell envy should be studied. You’re exhibit A.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
You sound extremely stupid. You know those two students didn’t falsely post that they’re attending MIT. The idea that they would lie about where they’re attending college, in a public post, to their family, friends, and classmates is ludicrous.
Sidwell envy should be studied. You’re exhibit A.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.
Taking IG posts as gospel and fact, now that's ignorant
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
DP, but it wouldn't be a big deal for Sidwell to not have MIT since their sole focus isn't STEM, it would be a huge deal for TJ and saying a lot given STEM is their thing and MIT would be a big school they are aiming... and given their class size it makes you question how they wouldn't get one...
It tells us that legacy plays a big role in Sidwell admissions. ( schools with legacies: high admissions, schools with no legacy: really low admissions).
BTW, TJ send kids to MIT every year.
Does it??? Cause a school not sending kids to a university that specializes in something that the school doesn't specialize in is called an outlier and is generally considered irrelevant by normal people...
No. This makes no sense for people who know something about higher education. Sidwell isn't like a school of the performing arts that has no STEM offerings. There are kids there who go on to careers in the sciences. There's no reason why its students couldn't get a degree from MIT like many other students from private schools and public schools around the world.
And they do get degrees from MIT, but not sending kids to MIT this particular year is far less of a red flag than TJ not sending kids to MIT this year...
TJ send kids to MIT every year, including this year, they just don’t post it on insta, sofar only 30% graduates post on insta.
Also TJ sending plenty of kids to Ivies, mostly majoring in Stem.
Plenty of people don't want to post about their college or other private matters in their life on Instagram. Student run Instagram pages are not going to be a complete record of information for college matriculation data at any particular high School.
Approximately 91% of Sidwell’s current seniors posted their college destinations on the Instagram page. It seems like they’re just proud of where they’re attending college in the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I suspect there were no legacy or athletic recruits among the TJ admits.
Why would you conclude that TJ students (or Blair/Whitman/Churchill for that matter) don't have a parent who attended HYPS?
How many Princeton legacies do you think go to public school at TJ?
I always look for schools that do not have any legacy preference as a gauge. MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU, Amherst, Berkeley (and all the UCs), Michigan. Other than Michigan, there’s significantly less acceptances to all of these schools across the board, both public and private, leading me to believe legacy is a big factor in all the admissions stats.
Aside from the SLACs, you are talking about STEM schools.
The only top STEM school with significant legacy is probably Stanford.
TJ has a reasonable number of MIT, JHU, CalTech, CMU.
Does STEM make a difference? Those schools have non-STEM too, and anyway most of the TJ kids going to Ivy+ are STEM majors.
I don’t know how many they really have but I see 0 MIT, 1 JHU, 2 Berkeley and 3 CMU posted on IG this year from TJ. Not many.
You may want to check again...or are you confusing TJ with Sidwell, which has not had any MIT matriculation in the last 4 years!
LOUD and wrong!
Sidwell sent two (2) c/o 2025 graduates to MIT last year. I know that many of you love to hate Sidwell, but these are easily disprovable lies.
LOUD and very, very wrong
https://www.polarislist.com/best-high-schools-in-washington-dc
O MIT matriculation in the last 4 years.![]()
So you are choosing to be willfully ignorant? You’re choosing to believe a questionable website with questionable data over the two young women who posted on Sidwell’s PUBLIC Instagram page that they’re attending MIT.
Go to Sidwell’s c/o 2025 IG page, scroll down until you find both posts, then come back here to apologize.