Anonymous wrote:When a student who got in does not accept admission, do they pick a waitlisted student from same school or pick the top waitlisted student across all schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2,762 kids applied and they have space for 500 or so kids. Lots of kids with great grades, who are in geometry or algebra 2, and who think they did well on the math problem are not going to be accepted. And if they had a quant test, many of those kids would have the same score, it wouldn’t change much.
The vast majority of the kids not selected have a good case for being selected. So do the kids who were accepted.
It's easy to say that when you don't have a test and you can't check the data.
This is not an excuse for a lottery or rejecting kids with better grades or better performance in the math part. If there is a quant test and taking SOLs into account, the decisions would carry weight. Right now, we have people in this thread saying that the SPS - something that has very little to do with STEM ability - mattered more.
You don’t think that the kids accepted Pass Advanced on the SOLs? Take a look at the A1H SOL scores for 7th grade, the Pass Advanced rate is close to 90%. All of these kids have high grades in honors and AAP classes.
No one knows what mattered more because we don’t know how anything is graded. Parents whose kids were not accepted are speculating because they are disappointed. Their kids grades and scores look the same as the kids accepted. It is unclear how kids are selected. That said, I would bet that the MAP and SOL scores of the kids accepted and the kids not accepted are close to the same as well.
The one change I would make is to change the Algebra 1 requirement to Geometry.
They’re speculating because the process isn’t transparent. It’s fine that you’d bet the MAP and SOL scores of accepted and non-accepted students are similar—but without actual data, that’s just an assumption. I’d argue the opposite: without transparency, there’s just as much reason to believe the scores aren’t as close as you suggest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Waitlisted but relieved. DC got into a very competitive private school and this makes me feel better about the money I’m about to spend. Bye FCPS! It’s been a shitshow.
I can't think of a better word to describe it than shitshow. People on here whining that their admissions to TJ still mean something and trying to talk down parents who know better. I wonder what they'll be saying once AIs make even their GPAs + fluff essays worthless.
Anonymous wrote:Waitlisted but relieved. DC got into a very competitive private school and this makes me feel better about the money I’m about to spend. Bye FCPS! It’s been a shitshow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think it makes sense to put a lot of weight on the essay portion. All the kids who are applying are taking accelerated math with good grades, we know that from their GPA and transcript. It’s harder to tell if people write well unless you see it due to variability in classes. TJ wants well-rounded kids.
accelerated math with good grades AND essay prep. That's what got us in. Yes, TJ wants well rounded kids!
I mean...dont you think most people here have accelerated math, good grades and essay prep. 😀
I think it is okay to admit some of its luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think it makes sense to put a lot of weight on the essay portion. All the kids who are applying are taking accelerated math with good grades, we know that from their GPA and transcript. It’s harder to tell if people write well unless you see it due to variability in classes. TJ wants well-rounded kids.
accelerated math with good grades AND essay prep. That's what got us in. Yes, TJ wants well rounded kids!
I mean...dont you think most people here have accelerated math, good grades and essay prep. 😀
I think it is okay to admit some of its luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think it makes sense to put a lot of weight on the essay portion. All the kids who are applying are taking accelerated math with good grades, we know that from their GPA and transcript. It’s harder to tell if people write well unless you see it due to variability in classes. TJ wants well-rounded kids.
accelerated math with good grades AND essay prep. That's what got us in. Yes, TJ wants well rounded kids!
I mean...dont you think most people here have accelerated math, good grades and essay prep. 😀
I think it is okay to admit some of its luck.
We didn't do essay prep
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think it makes sense to put a lot of weight on the essay portion. All the kids who are applying are taking accelerated math with good grades, we know that from their GPA and transcript. It’s harder to tell if people write well unless you see it due to variability in classes. TJ wants well-rounded kids.
accelerated math with good grades AND essay prep. That's what got us in. Yes, TJ wants well rounded kids!
I mean...dont you think most people here have accelerated math, good grades and essay prep. 😀
I think it is okay to admit some of its luck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2,762 kids applied and they have space for 500 or so kids. Lots of kids with great grades, who are in geometry or algebra 2, and who think they did well on the math problem are not going to be accepted. And if they had a quant test, many of those kids would have the same score, it wouldn’t change much.
The vast majority of the kids not selected have a good case for being selected. So do the kids who were accepted.
I think you're defending the indefensible here. If you have a group as large as 2,762 kids and you're trying to make the argument that they're all basically the same, it just doesn't fly. If you can't find some reasonable, objective way to determine their individual talents rather than treat them as a big homogeneous group, some of the good ones will be treated unfairly, and they'll know it because they know who their peers are.
2700+ kids wanting in means you have several highschools worth of kids who want that sort of academic experience.
Its a shame FCPS won't open another speciality high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2,762 kids applied and they have space for 500 or so kids. Lots of kids with great grades, who are in geometry or algebra 2, and who think they did well on the math problem are not going to be accepted. And if they had a quant test, many of those kids would have the same score, it wouldn’t change much.
The vast majority of the kids not selected have a good case for being selected. So do the kids who were accepted.
I think you're defending the indefensible here. If you have a group as large as 2,762 kids and you're trying to make the argument that they're all basically the same, it just doesn't fly. If you can't find some reasonable, objective way to determine their individual talents rather than treat them as a big homogeneous group, some of the good ones will be treated unfairly, and they'll know it because they know who their peers are.
2700+ kids wanting in means you have several highschools worth of kids who want that sort of academic experience.
Its a shame FCPS won't open another speciality high school.
How many of those kids are outright rejected though?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think it makes sense to put a lot of weight on the essay portion. All the kids who are applying are taking accelerated math with good grades, we know that from their GPA and transcript. It’s harder to tell if people write well unless you see it due to variability in classes. TJ wants well-rounded kids.
accelerated math with good grades AND essay prep. That's what got us in. Yes, TJ wants well rounded kids!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2,762 kids applied and they have space for 500 or so kids. Lots of kids with great grades, who are in geometry or algebra 2, and who think they did well on the math problem are not going to be accepted. And if they had a quant test, many of those kids would have the same score, it wouldn’t change much.
The vast majority of the kids not selected have a good case for being selected. So do the kids who were accepted.
I think you're defending the indefensible here. If you have a group as large as 2,762 kids and you're trying to make the argument that they're all basically the same, it just doesn't fly. If you can't find some reasonable, objective way to determine their individual talents rather than treat them as a big homogeneous group, some of the good ones will be treated unfairly, and they'll know it because they know who their peers are.
2700+ kids wanting in means you have several highschools worth of kids who want that sort of academic experience.
Its a shame FCPS won't open another speciality high school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2,762 kids applied and they have space for 500 or so kids. Lots of kids with great grades, who are in geometry or algebra 2, and who think they did well on the math problem are not going to be accepted. And if they had a quant test, many of those kids would have the same score, it wouldn’t change much.
The vast majority of the kids not selected have a good case for being selected. So do the kids who were accepted.
I think you're defending the indefensible here. If you have a group as large as 2,762 kids and you're trying to make the argument that they're all basically the same, it just doesn't fly. If you can't find some reasonable, objective way to determine their individual talents rather than treat them as a big homogeneous group, some of the good ones will be treated unfairly, and they'll know it because they know who their peers are.
2700+ kids wanting in means you have several highschools worth of kids who want that sort of academic experience.
Its a shame FCPS won't open another speciality high school.