Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does the section under the HOPE rating - "Please indicate all content areas where the students show ....." imply? Do full time AAP eligible students usually have checks against the boxes next to the subjects (Math, Writing, Reading,...) ? Do these boxes indicate subject level AAP recommendations?
DD has boxes checked for math, writing, reading, science, and social studies, and the comment underneath noted that she made significant growth on her winter MAP math assessment (she's in the 87th percentile).
She gets 4s and some 3s on her report cards.
The 87th percentile on the MAP is not a kid who should have the math box checked unless they are at a Title 1 school. That is a good overall score but a low score for even Advanced Math, never mind AAP. Toss in 3's on the report card and that is not a kid who I would think would be accepted into AAP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What does the section under the HOPE rating - "Please indicate all content areas where the students show ....." imply? Do full time AAP eligible students usually have checks against the boxes next to the subjects (Math, Writing, Reading,...) ? Do these boxes indicate subject level AAP recommendations?
DD has boxes checked for math, writing, reading, science, and social studies, and the comment underneath noted that she made significant growth on her winter MAP math assessment (she's in the 87th percentile).
She gets 4s and some 3s on her report cards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the HOPE is terrible and so subjective. GBRS was much more thorough and focused on academics and the teachers actually had to write about the child.
HOPE is just checking boxes and how can a teacher possibly know much in a class of 28 students. One of the category is ‘shows self awareness’. Seriously? How do you even assess that and what is self awareness in a 7 yr old? Another is “sensitive to larger issues of human concern”. Again what do you expect from a 7 yr old and how is a teacher monitoring this?
I think you can see self awareness and sensitivity to larger human concerns in 7 year olds. I certainly see it in mine and in her friends.
For self-awareness, when she is upset about something, she usually knows how to articulate what's bothering her and what tools she needs to use to handle it (talking to an adult, alone time, breathing, eating a snack). When a friend is upset with her, she can usually figure out why and take steps to apologize for her behavior. Many of her friends can also do this internally (self-awareness), but some can't yet and need an adult to explain.
For sensitivity to larger issues, my daughter is very curious about other peoples' motivations and beliefs in ways that I definitely wasn't at her age. Honestly, I know people love to hate on the religious holidays on the calendar, but I think having those days off has helped her understand that not everyone is like her and to investigate the multiculturalism of our society in ways that I wasn't prompted to do at her age. She asks about housing and homelessness, about gerrymandering (because of all the commercials and signs about voting), about the Iran war and what life is like at war here vs. living near the warzone, about which friends celebrate Easter and which ones were fasting for Ramadan, and which ones celebrate Passover and why they are all different.
There are other test scores and work samples to show the student's academics. I think these intangibles about the child's maturity and intellectual curiosity are important too. And I say all this as someone whose child didn't get into full time AAP.
Anonymous wrote:I think the HOPE is terrible and so subjective. GBRS was much more thorough and focused on academics and the teachers actually had to write about the child.
HOPE is just checking boxes and how can a teacher possibly know much in a class of 28 students. One of the category is ‘shows self awareness’. Seriously? How do you even assess that and what is self awareness in a 7 yr old? Another is “sensitive to larger issues of human concern”. Again what do you expect from a 7 yr old and how is a teacher monitoring this?
Anonymous wrote:I think the HOPE is terrible and so subjective. GBRS was much more thorough and focused on academics and the teachers actually had to write about the child.
HOPE is just checking boxes and how can a teacher possibly know much in a class of 28 students. One of the category is ‘shows self awareness’. Seriously? How do you even assess that and what is self awareness in a 7 yr old? Another is “sensitive to larger issues of human concern”. Again what do you expect from a 7 yr old and how is a teacher monitoring this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for clarifying about the questions I asked about those boxes (subject recommendations).
What amazes is that despite my kid being in the pool for full time AAP, good scores on his tests - NNAT, NGAT, MAP, VALS, mostly 4s on his report card, he still didn't get any recommendation for any subject. I was hoping he would get recommendation for Math at least since his NGAT Quantitative, MAPs scores are all in 98%-99% percentile.![]()
They are comparing your kid against his classmates. If you are at a school with a lot of kids with high scores, then they are comparing your kid against all those high score kids. They are not looking at test scores for the HOPE but what they see in the classroom compared against the other kids in the class.
The GBRS were individual assessments based on certain traits, the HOPE is a comparison. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are told that there are only so many kids in the class who can score high so you end up with a lot of kids in the middle areas. It doesn’t mean that they are not smart and capable but that there are other kids who are ahead of them in their class. At least, that is my understanding.
I think it should be a county wide standard. It is ridiculous to compare it against kids in your own school, because by middle school it is all mixed. I sub and see some AAP kids so behind my own kid. My kid not in AAP, but when they get to middle school they will be at the same school.
Anonymous wrote:I think the HOPE is terrible and so subjective. GBRS was much more thorough and focused on academics and the teachers actually had to write about the child.
HOPE is just checking boxes and how can a teacher possibly know much in a class of 28 students. One of the category is ‘shows self awareness’. Seriously? How do you even assess that and what is self awareness in a 7 yr old? Another is “sensitive to larger issues of human concern”. Again what do you expect from a 7 yr old and how is a teacher monitoring this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for clarifying about the questions I asked about those boxes (subject recommendations).
What amazes is that despite my kid being in the pool for full time AAP, good scores on his tests - NNAT, NGAT, MAP, VALS, mostly 4s on his report card, he still didn't get any recommendation for any subject. I was hoping he would get recommendation for Math at least since his NGAT Quantitative, MAPs scores are all in 98%-99% percentile.![]()
They are comparing your kid against his classmates. If you are at a school with a lot of kids with high scores, then they are comparing your kid against all those high score kids. They are not looking at test scores for the HOPE but what they see in the classroom compared against the other kids in the class.
The GBRS were individual assessments based on certain traits, the HOPE is a comparison. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are told that there are only so many kids in the class who can score high so you end up with a lot of kids in the middle areas. It doesn’t mean that they are not smart and capable but that there are other kids who are ahead of them in their class. At least, that is my understanding.
I think it should be a county wide standard. It is ridiculous to compare it against kids in your own school, because by middle school it is all mixed. I sub and see some AAP kids so behind my own kid. My kid not in AAP, but when they get to middle school they will be at the same school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thanks for clarifying about the questions I asked about those boxes (subject recommendations).
What amazes is that despite my kid being in the pool for full time AAP, good scores on his tests - NNAT, NGAT, MAP, VALS, mostly 4s on his report card, he still didn't get any recommendation for any subject. I was hoping he would get recommendation for Math at least since his NGAT Quantitative, MAPs scores are all in 98%-99% percentile.![]()
They are comparing your kid against his classmates. If you are at a school with a lot of kids with high scores, then they are comparing your kid against all those high score kids. They are not looking at test scores for the HOPE but what they see in the classroom compared against the other kids in the class.
The GBRS were individual assessments based on certain traits, the HOPE is a comparison. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are told that there are only so many kids in the class who can score high so you end up with a lot of kids in the middle areas. It doesn’t mean that they are not smart and capable but that there are other kids who are ahead of them in their class. At least, that is my understanding.
Anonymous wrote:What does the section under the HOPE rating - "Please indicate all content areas where the students show ....." imply? Do full time AAP eligible students usually have checks against the boxes next to the subjects (Math, Writing, Reading,...) ? Do these boxes indicate subject level AAP recommendations?