This is just as bad if not worse than the school bombing. They burned an oil refinery

* author the previous post that

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we’re spending $3.6 million per Tomahawk to kill people like the Minab schoolgirls, after killing Iran’s ancient leader, so that his far younger and as or more radical son could take his place.

How does this make Americans safer? How does pushing Iran to for sure go the Pakistan, North Korea route and for sure getting nuclear weapons make us safer? How does creating the circs to close Hormuz make us wealthier? What am I missing?

This didn't start in March 2026.
Iran's regime has been calling America "Satan" in unhinged rants, and its leadership has been talking endlessly about destroying America every day since 1979. They have launched countless attacks via proxies, attempted to assassinate Americans, and so on.
America hasn't been safe from them since 1979.

I don't think they have a path to getting functional nuclear weapons any time soon. I also don't think Hormuz will stay closed long. It's not hurting us anywhere near as badly as it's hurting China and India and other countries.

The people in Iran were protesting against the regime. Now murdering hundreds of kids? Exacerbating the water crisis? The US just radicalized a whole bunch of people and entrenched the hard line government.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup looks like we the Americans killed a school of little girls.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Exclusive: US investigation points to likely US responsibility in Iran school strike, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali

No it was the Iranians. Trump said the Iranians inaccurate weapons double tapped the school.

Do you have a more legitimate source than Reuters for this? Trump lies daily.

The Iranians play chess we play GTA.

That may be your opinion, but Reuters is quoting Pentagon sources who say that the US is responsible for bombing these little girls to death.

Funny that you didn't post your source. This is what they're actually saying:

"U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule ​out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and point to another responsible party in the incident.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Additionally, if it turns out the U.S. was responsible (and the jury's still out on that, as you can see), that doesn't mean it was intentional. The school is right next to the naval base, which *was* the target.

Who said the US intentionally killed the little girls? I am not happy with what my country is doing in Iran, but I don't think we've descended to the level of sociopaths. I do however think there's an increased level of incomptence at the Pentagon such that they would mistake a school for a naval base and kill so many children.

It doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. What matters is that there will be no accountability for it, and that makes the question of intent irrelevant.

What accountability is Iran offering up for the murder of tens of thousands of its own people? They just appointed a senior leadership figure to the group that did all that killing to be their Supreme Leader. And here you are, completely whitewashing what happened, refusing to acknowledge it and are only demanding accountability from the US. It's dishonest of you and you know it. If the US needs to take accountability (and I'd be more than happy to see Hegseth impeached and removed) then so too does the Supreme Leader on down. Can you say the same about Mojtaba Khameini and the IRGC and Basij leadership? And can you not deflect with dishonest BS about "that's what they want you to believe?"

+100
Honestly, these people have got to be working for the Iranian regime. I wonder if the pay is good.

DP

Like clockwork, the Zionists skulk into the conversation and point fingers at others for doing what they do every day.

Every accusation is a confession, indeed.

What a bullshit deflection. I'm the PP talking about accountability for all and I'm absolutely not a Zionist; I'm an atheist who thinks religion is an opiate for mentally ill masses, whether Christian nutjobs like Hegseth, or Jewish nutjobs like Netanyahu, or Islamic nutjobs like Khameini. I think Netanyahu, Trump, AND the Islamic Republic are evil.

You on the other hand can't bring yourself to condemn the brutal and oppressive Iranian regime and only want to condemn the US and Israel. Thus it's easy to see you have a dishonest agenda here. You're using accusations of "zionism" as a shield and a deflection, and you've FAILED, miserably. Stop with your dishonesty and own up to the Islamic Regime's evil - I can do that for my side, but until you do that you are just here posing and lying and peddling dishonest narratives.

You are vastly off the mark.

I unequivocally condemn the Islamist regimes (including Hamas and the Iranian regime), along with anyone who unconditionally supports them. I also condemn the Israeli regime, along with anyone who unconditionally supports them; and sadly, I also condemn my own government, and anyone who unconditionally supports it.

The bottom line is that my stance is beyond your criticism entirely - but it doesn’t even matter.

I don’t have to restate every position I’ve taken, every grievance I have, to validate THIS one position.

But it’s curious - do you know the ONLY group who demands that of others?

Zionists.

Whatsboutusm is a Western construct, a diseased strategy to evade actual accountability. And, look, as someone with no personal skin in the game, it’s painfully obvious who the “bad guys” are in this conflict, but also who the “really bad guys” are.

There’s no getting around that.

Again, I don't give a crap about zionists or your constant returning to the zionism argument - you're wasting your time and are wildly missing the mark with it, as I already explained to you.

And only now do you give a token condemnation of Islamic regimes, despite having had numerous opportunities to do so previously, only to go right back to your deflections and whataboutisms. Also, whataboutism isn't a "western" construct, that's only the western term for it - it's a Russian construct, "а что насчёт…?" going back to Soviet-era deflection tactics. You keep revealing more about yourself than getting closer to any truths here.

Anonymous wrote:So we’re spending $3.6 million per Tomahawk to kill people like the Minab schoolgirls, after killing Iran’s ancient leader, so that his far younger and as or more radical son could take his place.

How does this make Americans safer? How does pushing Iran to for sure go the Pakistan, North Korea route and for sure getting nuclear weapons make us safer? How does creating the circs to close Hormuz make us wealthier? What am I missing?

This didn't start in March 2026.
Iran's regime has been calling America "Satan" in unhinged rants, and its leadership has been talking endlessly about destroying America every day since 1979. They have launched countless attacks via proxies, attempted to assassinate Americans, and so on.
America hasn't been safe from them since 1979.

I don't think they have a path to getting functional nuclear weapons any time soon. I also don't think Hormuz will stay closed long. It's not hurting us anywhere near as badly as it's hurting China and India and other countries.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup looks like we the Americans killed a school of little girls.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Exclusive: US investigation points to likely US responsibility in Iran school strike, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali

No it was the Iranians. Trump said the Iranians inaccurate weapons double tapped the school.

Do you have a more legitimate source than Reuters for this? Trump lies daily.

The Iranians play chess we play GTA.

That may be your opinion, but Reuters is quoting Pentagon sources who say that the US is responsible for bombing these little girls to death.

Funny that you didn't post your source. This is what they're actually saying:

"U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule ​out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and point to another responsible party in the incident.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Additionally, if it turns out the U.S. was responsible (and the jury's still out on that, as you can see), that doesn't mean it was intentional. The school is right next to the naval base, which *was* the target.

Who said the US intentionally killed the little girls? I am not happy with what my country is doing in Iran, but I don't think we've descended to the level of sociopaths. I do however think there's an increased level of incomptence at the Pentagon such that they would mistake a school for a naval base and kill so many children.

It doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. What matters is that there will be no accountability for it, and that makes the question of intent irrelevant.

What accountability is Iran offering up for the murder of tens of thousands of its own people? They just appointed a senior leadership figure to the group that did all that killing to be their Supreme Leader. And here you are, completely whitewashing what happened, refusing to acknowledge it and are only demanding accountability from the US. It's dishonest of you and you know it. If the US needs to take accountability (and I'd be more than happy to see Hegseth impeached and removed) then so too does the Supreme Leader on down. Can you say the same about Mojtaba Khameini and the IRGC and Basij leadership? And can you not deflect with dishonest BS about "that's what they want you to believe?"

+100
Honestly, these people have got to be working for the Iranian regime. I wonder if the pay is good.

DP

Like clockwork, the Zionists skulk into the conversation and point fingers at others for doing what they do every day.

Every accusation is a confession, indeed.

What a bullshit deflection. I'm the PP talking about accountability for all and I'm absolutely not a Zionist; I'm an atheist who thinks religion is an opiate for mentally ill masses, whether Christian nutjobs like Hegseth, or Jewish nutjobs like Netanyahu, or Islamic nutjobs like Khameini. I think Netanyahu, Trump, AND the Islamic Republic are evil.

You on the other hand can't bring yourself to condemn the brutal and oppressive Iranian regime and only want to condemn the US and Israel. Thus it's easy to see you have a dishonest agenda here. You're using accusations of "zionism" as a shield and a deflection, and you've FAILED, miserably. Stop with your dishonesty and own up to the Islamic Regime's evil - I can do that for my side, but until you do that you are just here posing and lying and peddling dishonest narratives.

You are vastly off the mark.

I unequivocally condemn the Islamist regimes (including Hamas and the Iranian regime), along with anyone who unconditionally supports them. I also condemn the Israeli regime, along with anyone who unconditionally supports them; and sadly, I also condemn my own government, and anyone who unconditionally supports it.

The bottom line is that my stance is beyond your criticism entirely - but it doesn’t even matter.

I don’t have to restate every position I’ve taken, every grievance I have, to validate THIS one position.

But it’s curious - do you know the ONLY group who demands that of others?

Zionists.

Whatsboutusm is a Western construct, a diseased strategy to evade actual accountability. And, look, as someone with no personal skin in the game, it’s painfully obvious who the “bad guys” are in this conflict, but also who the “really bad guys” are.

There’s no getting around that.

So we’re spending $3.6 million per Tomahawk to kill people like the Minab schoolgirls, after killing Iran’s ancient leader, so that his far younger and as or more radical son could take his place.

How does this make Americans safer? How does pushing Iran to for sure go the Pakistan, North Korea route and for sure getting nuclear weapons make us safer? How does creating the circs to close Hormuz make us wealthier? What am I missing?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup looks like we the Americans killed a school of little girls.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Exclusive: US investigation points to likely US responsibility in Iran school strike, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali

No it was the Iranians. Trump said the Iranians inaccurate weapons double tapped the school.

Do you have a more legitimate source than Reuters for this? Trump lies daily.

The Iranians play chess we play GTA.

That may be your opinion, but Reuters is quoting Pentagon sources who say that the US is responsible for bombing these little girls to death.

Funny that you didn't post your source. This is what they're actually saying:

"U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule ​out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and point to another responsible party in the incident.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Additionally, if it turns out the U.S. was responsible (and the jury's still out on that, as you can see), that doesn't mean it was intentional. The school is right next to the naval base, which *was* the target.

Who said the US intentionally killed the little girls? I am not happy with what my country is doing in Iran, but I don't think we've descended to the level of sociopaths. I do however think there's an increased level of incomptence at the Pentagon such that they would mistake a school for a naval base and kill so many children.

It doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. What matters is that there will be no accountability for it, and that makes the question of intent irrelevant.

What accountability is Iran offering up for the murder of tens of thousands of its own people? They just appointed a senior leadership figure to the group that did all that killing to be their Supreme Leader. And here you are, completely whitewashing what happened, refusing to acknowledge it and are only demanding accountability from the US. It's dishonest of you and you know it. If the US needs to take accountability (and I'd be more than happy to see Hegseth impeached and removed) then so too does the Supreme Leader on down. Can you say the same about Mojtaba Khameini and the IRGC and Basij leadership? And can you not deflect with dishonest BS about "that's what they want you to believe?"

+100
Honestly, these people have got to be working for the Iranian regime. I wonder if the pay is good.

DP

Like clockwork, the Zionists skulk into the conversation and point fingers at others for doing what they do every day.

Every accusation is a confession, indeed.

What a bullshit deflection. I'm the PP talking about accountability for all and I'm absolutely not a Zionist; I'm an atheist who thinks religion is an opiate for mentally ill masses, whether Christian nutjobs like Hegseth, or Jewish nutjobs like Netanyahu, or Islamic nutjobs like Khameini. I think Netanyahu, Trump, AND the Islamic Republic are evil.

You on the other hand can't bring yourself to condemn the brutal and oppressive Iranian regime and only want to condemn the US and Israel. Thus it's easy to see you have a dishonest agenda here. You're using accusations of "zionism" as a shield and a deflection, and you've FAILED, miserably. Stop with your dishonesty and own up to the Islamic Regime's evil - I can do that for my side, but until you do that you are just here posing and lying and peddling dishonest narratives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t value women and girls. Americans feel worse about this than the Iranians do. Iran is making a big to do of it because they know this.

The Iranian government oppresses women, that's true. The jump from there to thinking Iranians don't care about the deaths of their children is crazy, though.

Just a few weeks ago, Basij and IRGC shot and killed, by some estimates, 30,000 unarmed protesters and injured tens of thousands more.

No, they don't care. It's no leap, it's stark reality.

+1
Can’t believe this has to be explained at all.

Are you all insane? Trump left the Iranian protestors high and dry, after he urged them on and said "help is on the way," and got more of them killed. They feel betrayed by him.

https://time.com/7347090/iran-protesters-trump-help/

Someone should have taped Trump's lips together before he said such a stupid thing. Whether he thought we should get involved or not, we couldn't "help" on any timeframe that could ever have affected the result. All he could ever have managed to do by shooting his mouth off was to get a bunch of Iranians killed.

"help" would have taken assets of the right kind in the region that the US can use offensively by ourselves or with local permission. The UAE/Saudis/... weren't going to give us permission to stage any attack from bases in their countries. There were no boots on the ground within a month of Iran, and it'd have taken a couple months to put together anything significant. To the extent there's is normally any independent US offensive capability nearby, for decades we've had a carrier group near the Gulf most of the time. But in January, Hesgeth had moved the Ford group from the ME to the Caribbean to dick around with drug runners in the Caribbean, result being we didn't even have one carrier group's offensive capability within 10 days of the Middle East.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t value women and girls. Americans feel worse about this than the Iranians do. Iran is making a big to do of it because they know this.

The Iranian government oppresses women, that's true. The jump from there to thinking Iranians don't care about the deaths of their children is crazy, though.

Just a few weeks ago, Basij and IRGC shot and killed, by some estimates, 30,000 unarmed protesters and injured tens of thousands more.

No, they don't care. It's no leap, it's stark reality.

+1
Can’t believe this has to be explained at all.

What is it we’re to do with this info?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t value women and girls. Americans feel worse about this than the Iranians do. Iran is making a big to do of it because they know this.

The Iranian government oppresses women, that's true. The jump from there to thinking Iranians don't care about the deaths of their children is crazy, though.

Just a few weeks ago, Basij and IRGC shot and killed, by some estimates, 30,000 unarmed protesters and injured tens of thousands more.

No, they don't care. It's no leap, it's stark reality.

+1
Can’t believe this has to be explained at all.

Are you all insane? Trump left the Iranian protestors high and dry, after he urged them on and said "help is on the way," and got more of them killed. They feel betrayed by him.

https://time.com/7347090/iran-protesters-trump-help/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran doesn’t value women and girls. Americans feel worse about this than the Iranians do. Iran is making a big to do of it because they know this.

The Iranian government oppresses women, that's true. The jump from there to thinking Iranians don't care about the deaths of their children is crazy, though.

Just a few weeks ago, Basij and IRGC shot and killed, by some estimates, 30,000 unarmed protesters and injured tens of thousands more.

No, they don't care. It's no leap, it's stark reality.

+1
Can’t believe this has to be explained at all.

Anonymous wrote:Bellingcat investigation shows Minab IRGC naval buildings were clearly the target.

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/2026/03/08/video-shows-us-tomahawk-missile-strike-next-to-girls-school-in-iran/

Of course it was. This is beyond obvious, but of course the nut jobs would have us believe we were actually targeting a school rather than the naval base right next to it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup looks like we the Americans killed a school of little girls.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Exclusive: US investigation points to likely US responsibility in Iran school strike, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali

No it was the Iranians. Trump said the Iranians inaccurate weapons double tapped the school.

Do you have a more legitimate source than Reuters for this? Trump lies daily.

The Iranians play chess we play GTA.

That may be your opinion, but Reuters is quoting Pentagon sources who say that the US is responsible for bombing these little girls to death.

Funny that you didn't post your source. This is what they're actually saying:

"U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule ​out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and point to another responsible party in the incident.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Additionally, if it turns out the U.S. was responsible (and the jury's still out on that, as you can see), that doesn't mean it was intentional. The school is right next to the naval base, which *was* the target.

Who said the US intentionally killed the little girls? I am not happy with what my country is doing in Iran, but I don't think we've descended to the level of sociopaths. I do however think there's an increased level of incomptence at the Pentagon such that they would mistake a school for a naval base and kill so many children.

It doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. What matters is that there will be no accountability for it, and that makes the question of intent irrelevant.

What accountability is Iran offering up for the murder of tens of thousands of its own people? They just appointed a senior leadership figure to the group that did all that killing to be their Supreme Leader. And here you are, completely whitewashing what happened, refusing to acknowledge it and are only demanding accountability from the US. It's dishonest of you and you know it. If the US needs to take accountability (and I'd be more than happy to see Hegseth impeached and removed) then so too does the Supreme Leader on down. Can you say the same about Mojtaba Khameini and the IRGC and Basij leadership? And can you not deflect with dishonest BS about "that's what they want you to believe?"

We’re able to ask for accountability from our elected leaders, who have been behaving like the bad guys for the last year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yup looks like we the Americans killed a school of little girls.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Exclusive: US investigation points to likely US responsibility in Iran school strike, sources say
By Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali

No it was the Iranians. Trump said the Iranians inaccurate weapons double tapped the school.

Do you have a more legitimate source than Reuters for this? Trump lies daily.

The Iranians play chess we play GTA.

That may be your opinion, but Reuters is quoting Pentagon sources who say that the US is responsible for bombing these little girls to death.

Funny that you didn't post your source. This is what they're actually saying:

"U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls' school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive military matters, did not rule ​out the possibility that new evidence could emerge that absolves the U.S. of responsibility and point to another responsible party in the incident.

https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-investigation-points-likely-us-responsibility-iran-school-strike-sources-say-2026-03-06/

Additionally, if it turns out the U.S. was responsible (and the jury's still out on that, as you can see), that doesn't mean it was intentional. The school is right next to the naval base, which *was* the target.

Who said the US intentionally killed the little girls? I am not happy with what my country is doing in Iran, but I don't think we've descended to the level of sociopaths. I do however think there's an increased level of incomptence at the Pentagon such that they would mistake a school for a naval base and kill so many children.

It doesn't matter whether it was intentional or not. What matters is that there will be no accountability for it, and that makes the question of intent irrelevant.

What accountability is Iran offering up for the murder of tens of thousands of its own people? They just appointed a senior leadership figure to the group that did all that killing to be their Supreme Leader. And here you are, completely whitewashing what happened, refusing to acknowledge it and are only demanding accountability from the US. It's dishonest of you and you know it. If the US needs to take accountability (and I'd be more than happy to see Hegseth impeached and removed) then so too does the Supreme Leader on down. Can you say the same about Mojtaba Khameini and the IRGC and Basij leadership? And can you not deflect with dishonest BS about "that's what they want you to believe?"