Langston spoke in favor of the move and AT spoke against it. Think that makes it pretty clear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

This was a couple months old. And was already discussed a few posts back. Try to keep up.

You too! Someone on here claimed AT parents are not upset about the move of Langston to the CC. Clearly that is wrong.

Most AT parents aren’t.

AT kids will be fine. This just isn’t a big deal.

someone tell that to the AT kids speaking before the school board.

Well. AT students are speaking now in opposition to the move.

Still claim to not be opposed, AT?

More recent Arlnow article https://www.arlnow.com/2026/01/29/amid-controversy-school-board-delays-programming-decisions-at-new-career-center-space/
This initially wasn’t going to go up for a vote at all. Duran et. al thought they could just slide it under the radar. I’m glad the board is taking time to look at it, even if I generally trust their decisions

Anonymous wrote:AT you can’t have it both ways. Just admit you’re opposed. Own it.

Not opposed. Our kids will be fine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

This was a couple months old. And was already discussed a few posts back. Try to keep up.

You too! Someone on here claimed AT parents are not upset about the move of Langston to the CC. Clearly that is wrong.

Most AT parents aren’t.

AT kids will be fine. This just isn’t a big deal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

The parents in the article from 2 months ago were looking for more info; they weren’t necessarily “opposed” to anything.

I’m sure some parents are opposed (ODD runs rampant in this area), but it’s not the general sentiment. Our kids are already co-located with kids on alternate paths.

The loudest voices on DCUM and FB are non-AT parents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

Are you saying I'm a troll because I posted the Arl Now article. I'm trying to understand the opposition to the plan from AT. First someone said no AT parents were opposed. Now we have shown that's clearly not true so I'm a troll?!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

This was a couple months old. And was already discussed a few posts back. Try to keep up.

You too! Someone on here claimed AT parents are not upset about the move of Langston to the CC. Clearly that is wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

So Arl Now is fake news now? Do you know how Trumpy you sound?

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

This was a couple months old. And was already discussed a few posts back. Try to keep up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then you missed the post from an AT parent.it was there.lots of concern about less access to cte classes for AT as I recall

I didn’t see that. Date?

Only saw some former AT parents “concerned” about Langston.

I assume you will just claim this is APE parents like always?

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/

McCaffrey is a hack.

This was two months ago. They didn’t bring up specific issues with the changes, just that they want more time and transparency in the process.

quote:

There’s a more recent statement from the Arlington Tech Advisory Committee that doesn’t really make sense. Lots of words to say they specifically have a problem with the Langston program and only want one school admin.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P1dquTBefwCJ1LjwmfQUtCYKXcByzrgw/view

The committee faces a challenging dilemma. They want to avoid transferring a program to their school, especially since it serves a high-needs student population. While there's concern about the potential impact on enrollment at their own school, opposing these sensitive students and program could also reflect poorly on them.

I think it's pretty clear. Here's a quote:
We oppose any narratives that stereotype, marginalize, or diminish Langston students in
a negative or exclusionary manner. Such views do not reflect the values or perspectives
of ATAC and misinterpret our concerns.

And we don’t want those kids here!

- random APEs without kids in APS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Then you missed the post from an AT parent.it was there.lots of concern about less access to cte classes for AT as I recall

I didn’t see that. Date?

Only saw some former AT parents “concerned” about Langston.

I assume you will just claim this is APE parents like always?

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/

McCaffrey is a hack.

This was two months ago. They didn’t bring up specific issues with the changes, just that they want more time and transparency in the process.

quote:

There’s a more recent statement from the Arlington Tech Advisory Committee that doesn’t really make sense. Lots of words to say they specifically have a problem with the Langston program and only want one school admin.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1P1dquTBefwCJ1LjwmfQUtCYKXcByzrgw/view

The committee faces a challenging dilemma. They want to avoid transferring a program to their school, especially since it serves a high-needs student population. While there's concern about the potential impact on enrollment at their own school, opposing these sensitive students and program could also reflect poorly on them.

I think it's pretty clear. Here's a quote:
We oppose any narratives that stereotype, marginalize, or diminish Langston students in
a negative or exclusionary manner. Such views do not reflect the values or perspectives
of ATAC and misinterpret our concerns.

Of course they have to say this. They would vilified otherwise. They are banking on Langston wanting to stay in their own facility, so they can champion for them to not come to GHC.

AT you can’t have it both ways. Just admit you’re opposed. Own it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure sounds like AT parents are upset about this

https://www.arlnow.com/2025/12/11/change-in-plans-for-new-career-center-facility-angers-arlington-tech-parents/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPx4gxleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZAo2NjI4NTY4Mzc5AAEeMXzm5DuYVGE9hdgUZgH3I3cBS6JzWKwVPxZkKd9HMZyi-4kb-Vs84MsINqk_aem_cyZ5NANVpr4dBJ-zubSppQ

Fake news, pseudologia fantastica practitioner. That was right after the no plan plan was released. read their own words published 1/26.

+1 APS published a plan, has very few details and then immediately backtracked.

are we having fun playing with the fuzzy little troll? I didn't know that their moss covered selves were so soft.

There’s a legitimate discussion here