Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:About the other big question here - your husband did this without your blessing.
No, I agreed because MIL said she would pay us back for the intervention. She did not.
Setting aside MIL’s promise to reimburse, why did you and DH pay for the intervention if you knew your SIL is receiving Medicaid and that the intervention would be covered under it (per your update)? Just trying to understand.
No, the intervention is not covered by Medicaid. Medicaid would have covered up to 45 days of in-patient rehab.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The people I know who suffer(ed) from opiod addiction became addicted after being prescribed it for severe pain through no fault of their own. You clearly have no idea how difficult it is to recover from this.
this is the problem with our society its always someone else fault so they just continue being crack heads. Sorry, we need some tough love and prison time.
Prison without rehab does nothing. I’m always shocked people are still this misinformed about addiction in 2026.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The people I know who suffer(ed) from opiod addiction became addicted after being prescribed it for severe pain through no fault of their own. You clearly have no idea how difficult it is to recover from this.
this is the problem with our society its always someone else fault so they just continue being crack heads. Sorry, we need some tough love and prison time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are the WORST kind a person. A total POS. If his sister wants help for the love of g-d help her!
She doesn’t want help—hence why they have to do an “intervention.”
Learn to think before being nasty to someone.
Anonymous wrote:You are the WORST kind a person. A total POS. If his sister wants help for the love of g-d help her!
Anonymous wrote:Ugh OP, so sorry.
I hope that your bleeding heart DH has learned his lesson.
If not then it’s time to leave. Addicts are very manipulative and will drain you financially.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:About the other big question here - your husband did this without your blessing.
No, I agreed because MIL said she would pay us back for the intervention. She did not.
Setting aside MIL’s promise to reimburse, why did you and DH pay for the intervention if you knew your SIL is receiving Medicaid and that the intervention would be covered under it (per your update)? Just trying to understand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:About the other big question here - your husband did this without your blessing.
No, I agreed because MIL said she would pay us back for the intervention. She did not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have multiple addicts in my family and no, we do not pay for the rehab.
Addiction is different than cancer, where everybody needs to help out.
An addict needs to take responsibility for themselves to recover. Saving them only enables them.
This.
I also have a sibling with an addiction problem, and the enabling IS the problem. If they don't take responsibility for themselves, they will not get better.
So I would not pay, it won't work. Addicts can destroy many other lives as they fall. I think the OP is right to be wary of this plan. The family as a whole will be better served by having at least one, whole, healthy family system within it.
My FIL paid for my SIL to go to rehab when she was in her 40s. She is an alcoholic and was addicted to meth. She’d lost her job, car, house, and daughter. She was living on a friend’s couch. Daughter was living with grandparents. I don’t know for sure but I heard it was around $30k.
Rehab changed her life and she’s been clean and sober for 11 years.
I know rehab doesn’t always work, I know some horror stories too, but that doesn’t mean paying for someone to go to rehab is enabling.
That doesn’t mean OP’s husband’s idea is a good one, but paying for rehab is not always a terrible idea.
Anonymous wrote:About the other big question here - your husband did this without your blessing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have multiple addicts in my family and no, we do not pay for the rehab.
Addiction is different than cancer, where everybody needs to help out.
An addict needs to take responsibility for themselves to recover. Saving them only enables them.
This.
I also have a sibling with an addiction problem, and the enabling IS the problem. If they don't take responsibility for themselves, they will not get better.
So I would not pay, it won't work. Addicts can destroy many other lives as they fall. I think the OP is right to be wary of this plan. The family as a whole will be better served by having at least one, whole, healthy family system within it.