Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, I suspect a Caltech graduate would not have any problem landing a quant job. Just none would be even remotely interested in doing that.

quant jobs are hard even for caltech grads

Oh god, something I actually know about. No, quant jobs are not hard for Caltech grads. I take it you don't recruit for, and probably couldn't name, the top 10 quant firms.

They are hard to get due to the interviews. Maybe you should pipe down and not be as presumptuous. I went to the other elite school in califonia and have classmates and experience at quant firms myself across JS, Two Sigma, HRT, RenTech, Citadel amongst others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

ah the emory fool is out in force again. jhu has like 60 econ grads a year - why should it place high compared to places with more econ majors on a total basis? but then again, goldman recruits on campus: https://www.instagram.com/p/DQr8Xjrjq5H/

Where are the emory events for goldman?

Here are the facts, emory sucks point and is overrated for the price it charges. It admits a ton through waitlists (over 100 students), has a shady oxford campus, and was caught previous making up admissions stats: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/08/20/emory-misreported-admissions-data-more-decade

Despite all this, it still has a yield of 24% by local students - a mere 10 out of 41 students admitted enrolled: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2025/09/10/mcps-students-college/

A truly truly garbage school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

Would go to jhu econ 100x over emory's lackluster undergrad bschool.

https://poetsandquantsforundergrads.com/news/best-undergraduate-business-schools-of-2025/
Ranked 8th mind you. Whats lack luster is JHU's outcomes.

DP. This is just a ranking for schools that have undergrad b-schools.

Is that not the point.... pp said the undergrad b school was lackluster not the mba

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

Would go to jhu econ 100x over emory's lackluster undergrad bschool.

https://poetsandquantsforundergrads.com/news/best-undergraduate-business-schools-of-2025/
Ranked 8th mind you. Whats lack luster is JHU's outcomes.

DP. This is just a ranking for schools that have undergrad b-schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, I suspect a Caltech graduate would not have any problem landing a quant job. Just none would be even remotely interested in doing that.

quant jobs are hard even for caltech grads

Oh god, something I actually know about. No, quant jobs are not hard for Caltech grads. I take it you don't recruit for, and probably couldn't name, the top 10 quant firms.

Only 10 Caltech grads at Jane Street according to linkedin, only 5 at optiver. Emory has 6 at Jane Street.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Stop replying to yourself. You're too old for the antics.

https://www.peakframeworks.com/post/ib-target-schools

Notice how JHU doesn't make the T50 for investment banking placement, Caltech doesn't even make the list although Caltech has an excuse because its so small. Either way Emory is better. Get over it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, I suspect a Caltech graduate would not have any problem landing a quant job. Just none would be even remotely interested in doing that.

quant jobs are hard even for caltech grads

Oh god, something I actually know about. No, quant jobs are not hard for Caltech grads. I take it you don't recruit for, and probably couldn't name, the top 10 quant firms.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

Would go to jhu econ 100x over emory's lackluster undergrad bschool.

https://poetsandquantsforundergrads.com/news/best-undergraduate-business-schools-of-2025/
Ranked 8th mind you. Whats lack luster is JHU's outcomes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

The point is even Top 10s aren't all around schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

Would go to jhu econ 100x over emory's lackluster undergrad bschool.

Anonymous wrote:Also, I suspect a Caltech graduate would not have any problem landing a quant job. Just none would be even remotely interested in doing that.

quant jobs are hard even for caltech grads

Also, I suspect a Caltech graduate would not have any problem landing a quant job. Just none would be even remotely interested in doing that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.

if they are getting into caltech or jhu, they wouldnt be going to trash like emory as an alternative choice

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

lol...to compare Emory to Caltech...oh lord these people are crazy

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For schools outside T10, you select schools by major, not by brand. Non-t10 schools typically have something strong going on, but not all around winners.

Some T10s aren't all around winners either. I wouldn’t go to Caltech or JHU for business/finance. A Emory would be much better for that.

By their DNA, Caltech and JHU are research universities. Yeah, you would rather go to CMC for finance than Caltech.

Emory is exactly what it means for selection by major.