Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They need a program if only to say that they aren’t excluding kids from other schools. If they don’t have one it looks exclusionary.

That is because they are telling everyone how unfair it is that the DCC schools "get to" share a bunch of programs that rich schools have at their home schools

Well the DCC have program that other poor schools don’t which is the issue.

Whitman can have their special programs that only Whitman students can partake in, but the poors in DCC absolutely cannot have special programs.

+1

"It's so unfair that some kids, like those at wealthy school and the DCC have access to special programs and others do not!"
"Okay, let's reduce access for DCC kids. For equity."

lol, exactly. And that's the proposed regional model in a nutshell.

"Also for equity we need to give the wealthy schools more programs so they aren't left out from getting more programs. But the DCC has to have less, for equity"

Well, you also have to force the poors to stay within their region with other poors, and give them a fake SMCS (which is actually a regular science class with the same teacher. just reclassified) so they can have something to celebrate.

Yes, bingo. Regional model = the ghettoization of MCPS... for equity

Most don’t care about smcs but we want the same opportunities your kids have for ours.

My kids live nowhere near a SMCS program. We're in a region that will have no established programs, just all new "just the same as the others we promise" programs. Give me break. We're getting screwed. At least under the current system my kids can access magnets at Poolesville, Blair, or RM if they get in. Under the regional model they get nothing but pretend programs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They need a program if only to say that they aren’t excluding kids from other schools. If they don’t have one it looks exclusionary.

That is because they are telling everyone how unfair it is that the DCC schools "get to" share a bunch of programs that rich schools have at their home schools

Well the DCC have program that other poor schools don’t which is the issue.

Whitman can have their special programs that only Whitman students can partake in, but the poors in DCC absolutely cannot have special programs.

+1

"It's so unfair that some kids, like those at wealthy school and the DCC have access to special programs and others do not!"
"Okay, let's reduce access for DCC kids. For equity."

lol, exactly. And that's the proposed regional model in a nutshell.

"Also for equity we need to give the wealthy schools more programs so they aren't left out from getting more programs. But the DCC has to have less, for equity"

Well, you also have to force the poors to stay within their region with other poors, and give them a fake SMCS (which is actually a regular science class with the same teacher. just reclassified) so they can have something to celebrate.

Yes, bingo. Regional model = the ghettoization of MCPS... for equity

Most don’t care about smcs but we want the same opportunities your kids have for ours.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They need a program if only to say that they aren’t excluding kids from other schools. If they don’t have one it looks exclusionary.

That is because they are telling everyone how unfair it is that the DCC schools "get to" share a bunch of programs that rich schools have at their home schools

Well the DCC have program that other poor schools don’t which is the issue.

Whitman can have their special programs that only Whitman students can partake in, but the poors in DCC absolutely cannot have special programs.

+1

"It's so unfair that some kids, like those at wealthy school and the DCC have access to special programs and others do not!"
"Okay, let's reduce access for DCC kids. For equity."

lol, exactly. And that's the proposed regional model in a nutshell.

"Also for equity we need to give the wealthy schools more programs so they aren't left out from getting more programs. But the DCC has to have less, for equity"

Well, you also have to force the poors to stay within their region with other poors, and give them a fake SMCS (which is actually a regular science class with the same teacher. just reclassified) so they can have something to celebrate.

Yes, bingo. Regional model = the ghettoization of MCPS... for equity

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They need a program if only to say that they aren’t excluding kids from other schools. If they don’t have one it looks exclusionary.

That is because they are telling everyone how unfair it is that the DCC schools "get to" share a bunch of programs that rich schools have at their home schools

Well the DCC have program that other poor schools don’t which is the issue.

Whitman can have their special programs that only Whitman students can partake in, but the poors in DCC absolutely cannot have special programs.

+1

"It's so unfair that some kids, like those at wealthy school and the DCC have access to special programs and others do not!"
"Okay, let's reduce access for DCC kids. For equity."

lol, exactly. And that's the proposed regional model in a nutshell.

"Also for equity we need to give the wealthy schools more programs so they aren't left out from getting more programs. But the DCC has to have less, for equity"

Well, you also have to force the poors to stay within their region with other poors, and give them a fake SMCS (which is actually a regular science class with the same teacher. just reclassified) so they can have something to celebrate.

Anonymous wrote:Btw, yes it is terrible to take away the DCC "for equity" but give Whitman and BCC more programs that siphon off DCC kids. That is called making INEQUITY worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so hilariously myopic. There are more schools in MCPS than just Whitman and DCC.

I could easily whine, "why does your DCC kid get to have school choice when mine has to stay at our high FARMS school if they don't get into RMIB/Blair?"

But I don't. Because I'm not a selfish toddler.

People are posting about how the regional program model will affect their own kids. I don't pretend to speak for other families, that's why I don't post about how families in other parts of the county will be impacted.

I'm not going to shut up because you hate the DCC and call us names in an effort to shut down advocacy.

But that's not what you're doing. Your "advocacy" comes at the expense of opportunities for other kids while deriding "equity." You are asking for exactly what you are mocking.

+100 People are advocating for equity they are complaining about Whitman and the DCC as though those are the only schools and kids that MCPS Central Office must consider.

How does this advocacy hurt other kids and who does it hurt?

They have already been asked this question multiple times and cannot answer because they are completely full of it and just want to shut us up

Because other non-DCC kids who are currently limited to their home-schools will now have the opportunity to go to a different school within their region in the proposed model. You are tying to take that opportunity away just because you don’t like the commute for your own kids.

I disagree with you that school choice is a good way to increase opportunity. It has been shown time and again that it does not help the kids that most need a better education. I am one of multiple posters that doesn't think the DCC is perfect and would rather they get rid of the DCC and focus on improving the home schools.

I am not trying to take away anyone's opportunities and do not agree with you that not moving forward with the regional program model would have that impact. In fact, I think the regional program model will likely take away opportunities from many kids. Therefore, by your logic, I could accuse you of "trying to take opportunities away from kids" - but I am a grown up who realizes we can disagree about which model provides more opportunities.

Anonymous wrote:

What is the purpose of a magnet school?

The purpose of a magnet school is to attract white students to schools full of black students, in order to desegregate the school district, increase political power for gaining resources for that school and to game the "schoolwide" performance metrics to show "equity".

A "gifted program" is no the same as a "magnet school"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so hilariously myopic. There are more schools in MCPS than just Whitman and DCC.

I could easily whine, "why does your DCC kid get to have school choice when mine has to stay at our high FARMS school if they don't get into RMIB/Blair?"

But I don't. Because I'm not a selfish toddler.

People are posting about how the regional program model will affect their own kids. I don't pretend to speak for other families, that's why I don't post about how families in other parts of the county will be impacted.

I'm not going to shut up because you hate the DCC and call us names in an effort to shut down advocacy.

But that's not what you're doing. Your "advocacy" comes at the expense of opportunities for other kids while deriding "equity." You are asking for exactly what you are mocking.

+100 People are advocating for equity they are complaining about Whitman and the DCC as though those are the only schools and kids that MCPS Central Office must consider.

How does this advocacy hurt other kids and who does it hurt?

They have already been asked this question multiple times and cannot answer because they are completely full of it and just want to shut us up

Because other non-DCC kids who are currently limited to their home-schools will now have the opportunity to go to a different school within their region in the proposed model. You are tying to take that opportunity away just because you don’t like the commute for your own kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so hilariously myopic. There are more schools in MCPS than just Whitman and DCC.

I could easily whine, "why does your DCC kid get to have school choice when mine has to stay at our high FARMS school if they don't get into RMIB/Blair?"

But I don't. Because I'm not a selfish toddler.

People are posting about how the regional program model will affect their own kids. I don't pretend to speak for other families, that's why I don't post about how families in other parts of the county will be impacted.

I'm not going to shut up because you hate the DCC and call us names in an effort to shut down advocacy.

But that's not what you're doing. Your "advocacy" comes at the expense of opportunities for other kids while deriding "equity." You are asking for exactly what you are mocking.

+100 People are advocating for equity they are complaining about Whitman and the DCC as though those are the only schools and kids that MCPS Central Office must consider.

How does this advocacy hurt other kids and who does it hurt?

They have already been asked this question multiple times and cannot answer because they are completely full of it and just want to shut us up

Because other non-DCC kids who are currently limited to their home-schools will now have the opportunity to go to a different school within their region in the proposed model. You are tying to take that opportunity away just because you don’t like the commute for your own kids.

I disagree with you that school choice is a good way to increase opportunity. It has been shown time and again that it does not help the kids that most need a better education. I am one of multiple posters that doesn't think the DCC is perfect and would rather they get rid of the DCC and focus on improving the home schools.

I am not trying to take away anyone's opportunities and do not agree with you that not moving forward with the regional program model would have that impact. In fact, I think the regional program model will likely take away opportunities from many kids. Therefore, by your logic, I could accuse you of "trying to take opportunities away from kids" - but I am a grown up who realizes we can disagree about which model provides more opportunities.

The numerous posters on here trying to preserve the DCC would disagree with you.

This is an anonymous forum. How am I to tell if I’m responding to the DCC “advocates” or a person who is suggesting that they get rid of it. Of course the best solution is for all schools to have the same quality and rigor as Whitman, but 1) that’s not an option on the table, and 2) that’s not within the realm of possibility.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so hilariously myopic. There are more schools in MCPS than just Whitman and DCC.

I could easily whine, "why does your DCC kid get to have school choice when mine has to stay at our high FARMS school if they don't get into RMIB/Blair?"

But I don't. Because I'm not a selfish toddler.

People are posting about how the regional program model will affect their own kids. I don't pretend to speak for other families, that's why I don't post about how families in other parts of the county will be impacted.

I'm not going to shut up because you hate the DCC and call us names in an effort to shut down advocacy.

But that's not what you're doing. Your "advocacy" comes at the expense of opportunities for other kids while deriding "equity." You are asking for exactly what you are mocking.

+100 People are advocating for equity they are complaining about Whitman and the DCC as though those are the only schools and kids that MCPS Central Office must consider.

How does this advocacy hurt other kids and who does it hurt?

They have already been asked this question multiple times and cannot answer because they are completely full of it and just want to shut us up

Because other non-DCC kids who are currently limited to their home-schools will now have the opportunity to go to a different school within their region in the proposed model. You are tying to take that opportunity away just because you don’t like the commute for your own kids.

I disagree with you that school choice is a good way to increase opportunity. It has been shown time and again that it does not help the kids that most need a better education. I am one of multiple posters that doesn't think the DCC is perfect and would rather they get rid of the DCC and focus on improving the home schools.

I am not trying to take away anyone's opportunities and do not agree with you that not moving forward with the regional program model would have that impact. In fact, I think the regional program model will likely take away opportunities from many kids. Therefore, by your logic, I could accuse you of "trying to take opportunities away from kids" - but I am a grown up who realizes we can disagree about which model provides more opportunities.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is so hilariously myopic. There are more schools in MCPS than just Whitman and DCC.

I could easily whine, "why does your DCC kid get to have school choice when mine has to stay at our high FARMS school if they don't get into RMIB/Blair?"

But I don't. Because I'm not a selfish toddler.

People are posting about how the regional program model will affect their own kids. I don't pretend to speak for other families, that's why I don't post about how families in other parts of the county will be impacted.

I'm not going to shut up because you hate the DCC and call us names in an effort to shut down advocacy.

But that's not what you're doing. Your "advocacy" comes at the expense of opportunities for other kids while deriding "equity." You are asking for exactly what you are mocking.

+100 People are advocating for equity they are complaining about Whitman and the DCC as though those are the only schools and kids that MCPS Central Office must consider.

How does this advocacy hurt other kids and who does it hurt?

They have already been asked this question multiple times and cannot answer because they are completely full of it and just want to shut us up

Because other non-DCC kids who are currently limited to their home-schools will now have the opportunity to go to a different school within their region in the proposed model. You are tying to take that opportunity away just because you don’t like the commute for your own kids.