Something had to be done.
trump did.
even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

US and Israel are some of the the biggest terrorists in the world post world war 2 and their actions have led to the deaths of tens of millions easily

Way more than 10 million casualties without a doubt. Take the death counts of every single war these countries have fought from Iraq to Vietnam to the Gaza genocide and so on and so forth, add all the dictators and cruel regimes that have been supported and installed, funding and arming of terrorist groups, and all the death and destruction resulting from toppling governments and destabilization in the global south. I cannot even begin to fathom all the consequences that have resulted from these terrorist nations.

Nobody should resist aggression, apparently especially (or maybe only, according to the Hamas apologist?) the US and Israel. That's the only way to have no civilian wartime losses. Just surrender when attacked. We'd all be speaking Japanese, German, or Arabic now, but so what?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Iran had agreed to not develop their nukes. Trump ripped up that agreement. Here we are.

This is one of the biggest fallacies of the JCPOA.
Iran was developing their nukes during the negotiations and continued after the negotiations.
You think they build Fordo AFTER Trump took office in 2017, LOL. No - they started building it between 2006 and 2009.
Iran violated the terms of the JCPOA continually by exceeding uranium enrichment limits. And, there were no "anywhere/any time" inspections as part of that agreement......
It was a crappy agreement and deserved to be thrown away. It was of no consequence since Iran did not abide by it and the US did not enforce it.

Trump enforced it

Anonymous wrote:Iran had agreed to not develop their nukes. Trump ripped up that agreement. Here we are.

This is one of the biggest fallacies of the JCPOA.
Iran was developing their nukes during the negotiations and continued after the negotiations.
You think they build Fordo AFTER Trump took office in 2017, LOL. No - they started building it between 2006 and 2009.
Iran violated the terms of the JCPOA continually by exceeding uranium enrichment limits. And, there were no "anywhere/any time" inspections as part of that agreement......
It was a crappy agreement and deserved to be thrown away. It was of no consequence since Iran did not abide by it and the US did not enforce it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

US and Israel are some of the the biggest terrorists in the world post world war 2 and their actions have led to the deaths of tens of millions easily

Way more than 10 million casualties without a doubt. Take the death counts of every single war these countries have fought from Iraq to Vietnam to the Gaza genocide and so on and so forth, add all the dictators and cruel regimes that have been supported and installed, funding and arming of terrorist groups, and all the death and destruction resulting from toppling governments and destabilization in the global south. I cannot even begin to fathom all the consequences that have resulted from these terrorist nations.

Right. Because Vietnam didn't fight an internecine war of its own making, Iraq didn't invade Kuwait, and Gaza didn't attack Israel on Oct. 7, so the responsibility for the consequences of those actions lies only with the U.S. and Israel? Each country which was attacked by its neighbor should simply have surrendered to prevent their attackers from possibly suffering casualties in response to their aggression? Sure seems like a recipe for global peace.

The problem with Democrats is they think they rule the world, and everyone plays by our rules. They believe that people in other countries have "rights" as specified by our laws. I'm not saying they don't have rights. It just isn't our role to impose our sense of "right" on other countries. It is also absurd to believe that these other countries will afford us our "rights" as we should want.

So, this whole line of reasoning is poor form. Iran has shown clearly, they will attack Israel with nukes at their earliest convenience.

Democrats? You mean the American government. Their whole purpose is to fund the war machine/MIC which means hundreds of wars and operations to overthrow other governments leaving terrible consequences for civilians everywhere. The one time some president gave any pushback, he ended up being assassinated.

And I think you've confused Iran and Israel. Israel has shown clearly, they want to attack and overthrow Iran's regime since the 1980s so long as they can get the US to do their dirty work just like in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

DP. Nope, PP was right. The current occupant of the White House emphasizes America First, regardless of whether you agree with that foreign policy. Past administrations (from both parties) have engaged in significant meddling in other countries' domestic politics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

US and Israel are some of the the biggest terrorists in the world post world war 2 and their actions have led to the deaths of tens of millions easily

Way more than 10 million casualties without a doubt. Take the death counts of every single war these countries have fought from Iraq to Vietnam to the Gaza genocide and so on and so forth, add all the dictators and cruel regimes that have been supported and installed, funding and arming of terrorist groups, and all the death and destruction resulting from toppling governments and destabilization in the global south. I cannot even begin to fathom all the consequences that have resulted from these terrorist nations.

Right. Because Vietnam didn't fight an internecine war of its own making, Iraq didn't invade Kuwait, and Gaza didn't attack Israel on Oct. 7, so the responsibility for the consequences of those actions lies only with the U.S. and Israel? Each country which was attacked by its neighbor should simply have surrendered to prevent their attackers from possibly suffering casualties in response to their aggression? Sure seems like a recipe for global peace.

The problem with Democrats is they think they rule the world, and everyone plays by our rules. They believe that people in other countries have "rights" as specified by our laws. I'm not saying they don't have rights. It just isn't our role to impose our sense of "right" on other countries. It is also absurd to believe that these other countries will afford us our "rights" as we should want.

So, this whole line of reasoning is poor form. Iran has shown clearly, they will attack Israel with nukes at their earliest convenience.

Democrats? You mean the American government. Their whole purpose is to fund the war machine/MIC which means hundreds of wars and operations to overthrow other governments leaving terrible consequences for civilians everywhere. The one time some president gave any pushback, he ended up being assassinated.

And I think you've confused Iran and Israel. Israel has shown clearly, they want to attack and overthrow Iran's regime since the 1980s so long as they can get the US to do their dirty work just like in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan and Somalia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

US and Israel are some of the the biggest terrorists in the world post world war 2 and their actions have led to the deaths of tens of millions easily

Way more than 10 million casualties without a doubt. Take the death counts of every single war these countries have fought from Iraq to Vietnam to the Gaza genocide and so on and so forth, add all the dictators and cruel regimes that have been supported and installed, funding and arming of terrorist groups, and all the death and destruction resulting from toppling governments and destabilization in the global south. I cannot even begin to fathom all the consequences that have resulted from these terrorist nations.

Right. Because Vietnam didn't fight an internecine war of its own making, Iraq didn't invade Kuwait, and Gaza didn't attack Israel on Oct. 7, so the responsibility for the consequences of those actions lies only with the U.S. and Israel? Each country which was attacked by its neighbor should simply have surrendered to prevent their attackers from possibly suffering casualties in response to their aggression? Sure seems like a recipe for global peace.

The problem with Democrats is they think they rule the world, and everyone plays by our rules. They believe that people in other countries have "rights" as specified by our laws. I'm not saying they don't have rights. It just isn't our role to impose our sense of "right" on other countries. It is also absurd to believe that these other countries will afford us our "rights" as we should want.

So, this whole line of reasoning is poor form. Iran has shown clearly, they will attack Israel with nukes at their earliest convenience.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

US and Israel are some of the the biggest terrorists in the world post world war 2 and their actions have led to the deaths of tens of millions easily

Way more than 10 million casualties without a doubt. Take the death counts of every single war these countries have fought from Iraq to Vietnam to the Gaza genocide and so on and so forth, add all the dictators and cruel regimes that have been supported and installed, funding and arming of terrorist groups, and all the death and destruction resulting from toppling governments and destabilization in the global south. I cannot even begin to fathom all the consequences that have resulted from these terrorist nations.

Right. Because Vietnam didn't fight an internecine war of its own making, Iraq didn't invade Kuwait, and Gaza didn't attack Israel on Oct. 7, so the responsibility for the consequences of those actions lies only with the U.S. and Israel? Each country which was attacked by its neighbor should simply have surrendered to prevent their attackers from possibly suffering casualties in response to their aggression? Sure seems like a recipe for global peace.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

US and Israel are some of the the biggest terrorists in the world post world war 2 and their actions have led to the deaths of tens of millions easily

Way more than 10 million casualties without a doubt. Take the death counts of every single war these countries have fought from Iraq to Vietnam to the Gaza genocide and so on and so forth, add all the dictators and cruel regimes that have been supported and installed, funding and arming of terrorist groups, and all the death and destruction resulting from toppling governments and destabilization in the global south. I cannot even begin to fathom all the consequences that have resulted from these terrorist nations.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Besides terror and oil, what are the contributions to the world by Iran? I’ll wait.

Until 1979, Iran was a reasonable, functional contributing member of the world. The Iranian people generally take pride in their heritage and culture.

What has Israel given the world. Nothing but death and destruction.

Israel gave us Jesus, the only means of entering the Kingdom of Heaven.

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. — John 14:6

Israel and the Jews don’t even believe what you just said. Jews don’t believe in Jesus as the messiah, the son of God, the only means of entering the Kingdom of Heaven.

Iran had agreed to not develop their nukes. Trump ripped up that agreement. Here we are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

US and Israel are some of the the biggest terrorists in the world post world war 2 and their actions have led to the deaths of tens of millions easily

More nonsensical hysterical claims without any basis whatsoever, not even remotely plausible unless you're happy to redefine words as they are used in the dictionary and are OK with patently fabricated "facts", like "tens of millions easily" dead due to the U.S. and Israel. Really? Where do you get this rubbish? The total number of U.S. and Israeli innocents murdered by Islamic terrorists, and the number of such terrorists eliminated in response, is nowhere like "tens of millions" And, most victims of Islamic terror are other Muslims, anyway, which has nothing to do with the U.S. or with Israel.

https://www.fondapol.org/en/study/islamist-terrorist-attacks-in-the-world-1979-2019/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean the biggest danger would be to DC, New York, LA and Chicago so I'm with you OP. Not much of a downside.

I feel you. It amazes me how after having been hit by Islam Jihadists a number of times there, Democrats have primaried a Muslim in New York.

I really don't wish that on New York, but it upsets me that we have had to go to war to protect them and their interests. Just Imagine if we hadn't gone to war in Afghanistan, after every Democrat senator voted to do so. But they are so bent on globalization and immigration for profit.

Democrats have become the enemy within.

Gross. Just gross. You’re a bigot.

It's not bigotry to describe facts. All Islamic terrorists are Islamic. It doesn't follow that all Muslims are terrorists, of course. But some clearly are.

Israel is a the biggest threat to the US. They are the enemy of democracy and the constitution.

More non sequiturs. Have you nothing else to say? Just spewing the same unsupported derogatory antisemitic assertions over and over in every thread on this board? And, as an aside, whose Constitution are you referring to? The U.S. constitution has nothing to do with the foundational documents of any other country, not even Hamas' genocidal charter.