Anonymous wrote:Were there a lot of protestors who previously voted for Trump just last Nov? Otherwise what's the basis to say the election doesn't reflect what we are as a country / what people wanted?
Plenty may not be MAGA by whatever definition but are basically "okay" with it as they voted for it it did not vote. Sorry nothing else matters.
Anonymous wrote:You lost all seven swing states.
Have a nice day, progressives.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, dummy. Polls show that immigration is supported by Americans but he ran on deporting criminals. Polls show that people don’t want the chaos in which ice is going about it, deporting basically everyoneAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
![]()
He overreached. Look at his poll #s
Context is everything. His numbers are way higher than democrat numbers.
Which is why the GOP and reasonable Trump voters should be furious with him. He had a chance to actually do some things that could make a real and meaningful difference in people’s lives. That’s not what he prioritized.
You still don’t get it so you? This IS what we voted for.
He ran on deporting criminals but then didn't do that. Instead he deported harmless, hard-working, churchgoing, productive farmers, kitchen workers, maintenance workers, maids, construction workers and so on. He deported spouses, he deported parents of US citizens, he destroyed families. So much pointless, damaging chaos. We needed coherent immigration policy, not this.
He ran on stopping illegal immigration and deporting all illegal aliens. He never said he was only going to deport criminals and leave other illegals in the country.
They set a goal to deport 1 million illegal aliens a year. They deported most criminals already and realized that they are stlll far below their 1 million goal.
Now they need to go after law abiding illegal aliens to meet their goal and fulfill his promises.
They demonized illegal immigrants and make it sound like the vast majority are criminals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, dummy. Polls show that immigration is supported by Americans but he ran on deporting criminals. Polls show that people don’t want the chaos in which ice is going about it, deporting basically everyoneAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
![]()
He overreached. Look at his poll #s
Context is everything. His numbers are way higher than democrat numbers.
Which is why the GOP and reasonable Trump voters should be furious with him. He had a chance to actually do some things that could make a real and meaningful difference in people’s lives. That’s not what he prioritized.
You still don’t get it so you? This IS what we voted for.
He ran on deporting criminals but then didn't do that. Instead he deported harmless, hard-working, churchgoing, productive farmers, kitchen workers, maintenance workers, maids, construction workers and so on. He deported spouses, he deported parents of US citizens, he destroyed families. So much pointless, damaging chaos. We needed coherent immigration policy, not this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't doubt if election were held again tomorrow, T would defeat Harris again with the same EC results. The No Kings protests are nothing more than therapy for D voters and nobody else. It's Monday, the protests might as well have never happened. Polls underperformed T in 2016, 2020 and 2024. What makes you think they still aren't underperforming him?
I doubt it.
everything he promised has gone to crap and if he starts a war with Iran where US troops are involved, then all bets are off. MAGA voted for isolationism and no wars.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody voted for Russell Vought, Stephen Miller or Project 2025, yet that's what we're getting.
Trump made it pretty clear, despite his lies, that Project2025 and Stephen Miller were on the agenda. The problem is, MAGA believed Trump when Trump falsely claimed he didn't know anything about Project2025.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
![]()
He overreached. Look at his poll #s
Context is everything. His numbers are way higher than democrat numbers.
Which is why the GOP and reasonable Trump voters should be furious with him. He had a chance to actually do some things that could make a real and meaningful difference in people’s lives. That’s not what he prioritized.
You still don’t get it so you? This IS what we voted for.
You voted for masked stormtoopers snatching people off the streets?
Lovely.
You voted for millions of unvetted illegal immigrants to enter the country, many of which have zero stake in this country and fly the flags of their home countries as a symbol of pride.... but yet don't want to go back to their home countries?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
![]()
He overreached. Look at his poll #s
Context is everything. His numbers are way higher than democrat numbers.
Which is why the GOP and reasonable Trump voters should be furious with him. He had a chance to actually do some things that could make a real and meaningful difference in people’s lives. That’s not what he prioritized.
You still don’t get it so you? This IS what we voted for.
You voted for masked stormtoopers snatching people off the streets?
Lovely.
Anonymous wrote:There is no overlap between Americans and maga any more than there is overlap between maga and Christians. They’ve made it quite clear that they despise the ideals of both Jesus and America.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody voted for Russell Vought, Stephen Miller or Project 2025, yet that's what we're getting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think most Americans are MAGA. But I definitely think most Americans don’t want what the Democrats are selling. They need to move way, way more center and drop the “progressive” agenda to win again.
There is more to it than progressives. Democrats like to try to pin the blame on them, but as annoying as they are to everyone. It is globalism we don't like. I don't think progressives have any problems with tariffs for example, especially if they can be used to keep their projects afloat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody voted for Russell Vought, Stephen Miller or Project 2025, yet that's what we're getting.
Stop the nonsense. These people were not on the ballot but they were well known to be Trump's associates who would drive his policies if elected. If voters didn't want these people to be in charge, they should have voted differently.
Anonymous wrote:No, dummy. Polls show that immigration is supported by Americans but he ran on deporting criminals. Polls show that people don’t want the chaos in which ice is going about it, deporting basically everyoneAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump has overreached, that’s for damn sure. People wanted lower prices. He took his marginal, not-even-a-majority win that he eked out as a sign that what they really wanted was for a wanna-be dictator, the richest man in human history, and a team of staggeringly uninformed opportunists to break absolutely everything— from the global economy to checks and balances to the paltry social safety net to any semblance of ethical guardrails.
Mind you, I’m not opposed to breaking things. I’d break our corporate shareholder-prioritizated healthcare system and replace it with Medicare for All in faster than you can say “our formulary no longer covers that.” But this corrupt, ignorant, mendacious, taxpayer-funded free-for-all? Massive overreach.
Of course. You democrats invite in 10 million people with no background checks, but Trump deporting 100,000 criminals is overreach. Uh huh.
F your party "ethics".
![]()
He overreached. Look at his poll #s
Context is everything. His numbers are way higher than democrat numbers.
Which is why the GOP and reasonable Trump voters should be furious with him. He had a chance to actually do some things that could make a real and meaningful difference in people’s lives. That’s not what he prioritized.
You still don’t get it so you? This IS what we voted for.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody voted for Russell Vought, Stephen Miller or Project 2025, yet that's what we're getting.