Anonymous wrote:This whole exercise is unbelievably stupid. This info is all public. These guys are such jokes. Any fed or civically engaged American knows this. What a collosal waste of tax payer money to gather the data - THAT IS ALREADY PUBLIC, create this site and then...publicize it.
Anonymous wrote:This whole exercise is unbelievably stupid. This info is all public. These guys are such jokes. Any fed or civically engaged American knows this. What a collosal waste of tax payer money to gather the data - THAT IS ALREADY PUBLIC, create this site and then...publicize it.
I don't think PP understands what you mean by 'contribute'. It means a saving plan. That KG teacher put money in a savings plan that later pays her pension.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is not the current salaries that is expensive it is Govt in general pays multiple people to do same job.
My daughter who started kindergarten the nice teacher explained she actually went to kindergarten in same class room she teaches in. She said she keeps in touch the prior kindergarten teacher who recently retired and her own kindergarten teacher she keeps in touch with who had job before the prior kindergarten teacher.
If you do the math taxpayers pay current teacher salary, pension teacher she took over for and pension retirement kindergarten teacher.
They are paying three salaries and three sets medical benefits but only one current teacher.
Crazy way to operate business paying former employees to do nothing
In private sector once you are done that’s that.
They should get rid of all pensions and medical in retirement all new govt employees.
Do you realize that you are talking about state and county pensions? Nothing you say has anything to do with the federal government. And btw, the majority of federal (and state) workers contribute to their retirement just like private sector.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For a bunch of tech "geniuses", that is the most amature looking website I have ever seen. SAD.
As long as it gets the job done, that’s fine with me. It’s supposed to be about efficiency and cost savings. Eliminate the positions as quickly as possible and save the taxpayers money. It doesn’t need to be fancy!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For a bunch of tech "geniuses", that is the most amature looking website I have ever seen. SAD.
As long as it gets the job done, that’s fine with me. It’s supposed to be about efficiency and cost savings. Eliminate the positions as quickly as possible and save the taxpayers money. It doesn’t need to be fancy!
This is where you think waste is? OMG.
You’re the one complaining about the simple site. Do you want them to spend more money on it? They are focused on Draining the Swamp, not web design.
Anonymous wrote:I think this site proves that there is no waste and fraud. You’re 47 years old and making less than $100k with an Ivy degree? Sounds like you’re volunteering your expertise to me.
Anonymous wrote:It is not the current salaries that is expensive it is Govt in general pays multiple people to do same job.
My daughter who started kindergarten the nice teacher explained she actually went to kindergarten in same class room she teaches in. She said she keeps in touch the prior kindergarten teacher who recently retired and her own kindergarten teacher she keeps in touch with who had job before the prior kindergarten teacher.
If you do the math taxpayers pay current teacher salary, pension teacher she took over for and pension retirement kindergarten teacher.
They are paying three salaries and three sets medical benefits but only one current teacher.
Crazy way to operate business paying former employees to do nothing
In private sector once you are done that’s that.
They should get rid of all pensions and medical in retirement all new govt employees.
Anonymous wrote:This site is not a flex. You can get rid of all the federal workers and still need $3.8 trillion to cover the tax cuts for the rich you need. Clearly, the federal payroll does not make a dent.
Anonymous wrote:It is not the current salaries that is expensive it is Govt in general pays multiple people to do same job.
My daughter who started kindergarten the nice teacher explained she actually went to kindergarten in same class room she teaches in. She said she keeps in touch the prior kindergarten teacher who recently retired and her own kindergarten teacher she keeps in touch with who had job before the prior kindergarten teacher.
If you do the math taxpayers pay current teacher salary, pension teacher she took over for and pension retirement kindergarten teacher.
They are paying three salaries and three sets medical benefits but only one current teacher.
Crazy way to operate business paying former employees to do nothing
In private sector once you are done that’s that.
They should get rid of all pensions and medical in retirement all new govt employees.
Anonymous wrote:It is not the current salaries that is expensive it is Govt in general pays multiple people to do same job.
My daughter who started kindergarten the nice teacher explained she actually went to kindergarten in same class room she teaches in. She said she keeps in touch the prior kindergarten teacher who recently retired and her own kindergarten teacher she keeps in touch with who had job before the prior kindergarten teacher.
If you do the math taxpayers pay current teacher salary, pension teacher she took over for and pension retirement kindergarten teacher.
They are paying three salaries and three sets medical benefits but only one current teacher.
Crazy way to operate business paying former employees to do nothing
In private sector once you are done that’s that.
They should get rid of all pensions and medical in retirement all new govt employees.
Anonymous wrote:How does any CFPB employee have 35+ years with the agency?