Yes of course. Those early humans were serious polluters to create enough greenhouse gases to melt all that ice, well before the industrial age.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The climate has been changing since most of North America was covered by an ice sheet 10000 years ago. And guess what, it’s going to keep changing, regardless of how many people switch to electric cars.Anonymous wrote:Republicans are desperately trying to deflect from the fact that the primary cause is climate change. Not lesbian firefighters, not undefined “woke” policies - climate change.
Human caused climate change is settled fact.
https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I'm not the only one who noticed the heartless Republican response to the LA fires.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-01-09/barabak-column-california-wildfires-trump-republicans-politicizing-epic-natural-disaster
I guess the LA Times should have endorsed Harris.
Anonymous wrote:Well, I'm not the only one who noticed the heartless Republican response to the LA fires.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2025-01-09/barabak-column-california-wildfires-trump-republicans-politicizing-epic-natural-disaster
Anonymous wrote:The climate has been changing since most of North America was covered by an ice sheet 10000 years ago. And guess what, it’s going to keep changing, regardless of how many people switch to electric cars.Anonymous wrote:Republicans are desperately trying to deflect from the fact that the primary cause is climate change. Not lesbian firefighters, not undefined “woke” policies - climate change.
The climate has been changing since most of North America was covered by an ice sheet 10000 years ago. And guess what, it’s going to keep changing, regardless of how many people switch to electric cars.Anonymous wrote:Republicans are desperately trying to deflect from the fact that the primary cause is climate change. Not lesbian firefighters, not undefined “woke” policies - climate change.
Anonymous wrote:Republicans are desperately trying to deflect from the fact that the primary cause is climate change. Not lesbian firefighters, not undefined “woke” policies - climate change.
Anonymous wrote:Why do people waste time on this scenario of controlling what happens to federal tax dollars from/to a particular state ? Once Federal taxes are paid, the money is pooled and spent as dictated by the various Federal programs. There is no practical way to prevent federal taxes paid by Californians from going to Texas or Fla, or vice Versa.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The MAGAs politicizing this tragedy are truly disgusting. Why do you hate your fellow countrymen so much just because they vote for democrats?
There really needs to be consequences for you lefties being hard headed, stupid, and bringing everyone down through your lowest common denominator mentality.
I don't mean political consequences.
I really do hate my fellow countrycommunists.
So long as no money from California flows to red states, we can probably make a deal here. But the outstretched hands demanding California money while at the same time claiming superiority is too much.
If CA wants to keep more tax dollars, the only practical thing they can do is raise their own state taxes. And, I think that is exactly what should happen here. They can vote to have a surcharge tax increase for a certain number of years to pay for this. Make it extremely progressive, so the rich pay most of it. The rich are going to benefit when the rebuild is complete.
Why do people waste time on this scenario of controlling what happens to federal tax dollars from/to a particular state ? Once Federal taxes are paid, the money is pooled and spent as dictated by the various Federal programs. There is no practical way to prevent federal taxes paid by Californians from going to Texas or Fla, or vice Versa.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The MAGAs politicizing this tragedy are truly disgusting. Why do you hate your fellow countrymen so much just because they vote for democrats?
There really needs to be consequences for you lefties being hard headed, stupid, and bringing everyone down through your lowest common denominator mentality.
I don't mean political consequences.
I really do hate my fellow countrycommunists.
So long as no money from California flows to red states, we can probably make a deal here. But the outstretched hands demanding California money while at the same time claiming superiority is too much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The MAGAs politicizing this tragedy are truly disgusting. Why do you hate your fellow countrymen so much just because they vote for democrats?
Agree. As a democrat who grew up in North Carolina, the country really came together in empathy for those who lost homes and businesses. It's very sad to know that apparently the only real Americans are those who live in red states. Those in blue states don't merit our compassion.
Of course there is compassion. There’s also recognition that there were colossal policy errors in that democrat run state that contributed to this.
Ignoring flood zone warnings in red states is not a colossal policy error?
Whataboutism isn’t an argument. Start a new thread if you want to debate flood zones which affect both red and blue states. This is a thread about California.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The MAGAs politicizing this tragedy are truly disgusting. Why do you hate your fellow countrymen so much just because they vote for democrats?
Agree. As a democrat who grew up in North Carolina, the country really came together in empathy for those who lost homes and businesses. It's very sad to know that apparently the only real Americans are those who live in red states. Those in blue states don't merit our compassion.
Of course there is compassion. There’s also recognition that there were colossal policy errors in that democrat run state that contributed to this.
Would you agree that California can keep all the money it sends to the federal government that is redistributed to the taker red states? If so you’ve got a deal. California will self-flagellate about its “policy errors” as much as you like, and California will also get to keep all of its money that is currently taken and sent to red states. I’m sure both MAGA and Californians would be happy to take that deal.
Deal for what? I’m not a Californian and this is their mess to deal with. I’m just pointing out that there are costs associated with flawed priorities, not filling your water reservoirs and not allowing insurance companies to price out risk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The MAGAs politicizing this tragedy are truly disgusting. Why do you hate your fellow countrymen so much just because they vote for democrats?
Agree. As a democrat who grew up in North Carolina, the country really came together in empathy for those who lost homes and businesses. It's very sad to know that apparently the only real Americans are those who live in red states. Those in blue states don't merit our compassion.
Of course there is compassion. There’s also recognition that there were colossal policy errors in that democrat run state that contributed to this.
Ignoring flood zone warnings in red states is not a colossal policy error?