Anonymous wrote:I think you’re nuts if you think the government doesn’t know what these things are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The press conference today with John Kirby was crazy. He's basically straight up lying about the drones and the awesome journalists refuse to buy his BS. Hats off to them. Given his bald face lies on the record, I have to think the drones are controlled by the US gov - but for god only knows what purpose.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hcvfs6/reporter_calls_out_pentagon_gaslighting_theyre/
For sure it's the Biden administration. But why do this over the crowded eastern seaboard in the weeks leading up to the inauguration?
It doesn't add up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The war has come to us.
I get that we have no leadership but why aren’t the joint chiefs doing anything about this? Are they neutered without a Presidential order?
I wonder the same thing. At the *very* least, why aren't our military jets tailing these drones - especially the ones that are flying in restricted airspace? It seems unreal that they're just leaving them alone to do whatever the hell they're doing.
Anonymous wrote:The press conference today with John Kirby was crazy. He's basically straight up lying about the drones and the awesome journalists refuse to buy his BS. Hats off to them. Given his bald face lies on the record, I have to think the drones are controlled by the US gov - but for god only knows what purpose.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1hcvfs6/reporter_calls_out_pentagon_gaslighting_theyre/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yAnonymous wrote:Question for the MAGA trolls. Why hasn't any of your 2nd Amendment militia used their gun rights to shoot some of them out of the sky? I mean this seriously.
I realize you’ve clearly never fired a gun in your life, and that’s what led you to ask such an embarrassingly stupid question and think you sounded witty while doing it, but I’ll humor you with an actual answer, so you won’t look like such an utter imbecile in the future:
Shooting at a moving target overhead is best accomplished with a shotgun, which fires a cloud of small metal pellets, and is effective at hitting objects with reasonable accuracy up to about 250 high and maybe 200 feet away. After that, the “cloud” of shot pellets dispersers too much and the pellets themselves start to lose velocity to the point where they don’t have enough speed to do damage.
A rifle, which fires a single bullet instead of a cloud of pellets, is more accurate for distances up to several hundred yards up/out, but the problem is, with a moving target, you will probably never be able to “lead” the target properly at an unknown range to hit it. And in the meantime, the bullet you fired at it and missed with IS going to come down somewhere, potentially damaging something or someone. And contrary to what you think, most gun owners are keenly aware of the dangers of firing a rifle bullet into the air at shallow angles, and wouldn’t shoot at something in the air with a rifle unless it was practically overhead and the shot was nearly vertical (because the bullet will reach zero velocity at apogee and then fall back down at about the terminal velocity of a hailstone). And that would be a pretty unlikely scenario.
A handgun would be totally useless due to lack of any accuracy at all, and the bullet losing energy very quickly after a few hundred yards.
Plus, these drones being sighted are enormous. They’re so large that a single hit by a rifle bullet or a dozen smaller shotgun pellets probably isn’t going to cause the type of damage that would bring it down immediately.
So that’s why gun owners aren’t shooting them down. Because they’re not nearly as stupid as you are.
Now go forth and be slightly better-informed and not looking like such an idiot.
Why are you such an a**? Do you think it makes you sound smart?
1) it’s hilarious that you think being called an “ass” affects me… other than making me laugh![]()
2) I’m very smart.
Everyone I’ve ever met who says they’re smart is not smart at all. Dumb people are too dumb to know they are dumb.
Savage burn, bruh. Savage. I’m so crushed I’m gonna go kill myself now.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:January 20th can’t come soon enough.
Agreed. I’m really looking forward to Trump and his nutjob crew’s disaster. It’s going to be entertaining watching the trumpers eat each other.
Anonymous wrote:NY, NJ and DC.
This seems like training for the new Pearl Harbor/9/11 to drag Trump into war.
Am I wrong?
Anonymous wrote:
White Homes claims these drones are not malicious.
LIARS.
Anonymous wrote:The war has come to us.
I get that we have no leadership but why aren’t the joint chiefs doing anything about this? Are they neutered without a Presidential order?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yAnonymous wrote:Question for the MAGA trolls. Why hasn't any of your 2nd Amendment militia used their gun rights to shoot some of them out of the sky? I mean this seriously.
I realize you’ve clearly never fired a gun in your life, and that’s what led you to ask such an embarrassingly stupid question and think you sounded witty while doing it, but I’ll humor you with an actual answer, so you won’t look like such an utter imbecile in the future:
Shooting at a moving target overhead is best accomplished with a shotgun, which fires a cloud of small metal pellets, and is effective at hitting objects with reasonable accuracy up to about 250 high and maybe 200 feet away. After that, the “cloud” of shot pellets dispersers too much and the pellets themselves start to lose velocity to the point where they don’t have enough speed to do damage.
A rifle, which fires a single bullet instead of a cloud of pellets, is more accurate for distances up to several hundred yards up/out, but the problem is, with a moving target, you will probably never be able to “lead” the target properly at an unknown range to hit it. And in the meantime, the bullet you fired at it and missed with IS going to come down somewhere, potentially damaging something or someone. And contrary to what you think, most gun owners are keenly aware of the dangers of firing a rifle bullet into the air at shallow angles, and wouldn’t shoot at something in the air with a rifle unless it was practically overhead and the shot was nearly vertical (because the bullet will reach zero velocity at apogee and then fall back down at about the terminal velocity of a hailstone). And that would be a pretty unlikely scenario.
A handgun would be totally useless due to lack of any accuracy at all, and the bullet losing energy very quickly after a few hundred yards.
Plus, these drones being sighted are enormous. They’re so large that a single hit by a rifle bullet or a dozen smaller shotgun pellets probably isn’t going to cause the type of damage that would bring it down immediately.
So that’s why gun owners aren’t shooting them down. Because they’re not nearly as stupid as you are.
Now go forth and be slightly better-informed and not looking like such an idiot.
Why are you such an a**? Do you think it makes you sound smart?
You, 17:31, owe us an apology for your gross stupidity.
— Different poster
LOL. Yeah sure. As if the MAGA militia knows that.