Anonymous wrote:Any way paying customers can file a motion to remove Mark and John from cashing in almost 200k for virtually no ROI?
Anonymous wrote:whut?!Anonymous wrote:NVA is looking down the road and where the best platforms will be for their players for exposure and recruiting. If they think MLSN + GA will be the bigger deal than ECNL + ECNL, they'll make the switch right away to position themselves first before any of their competition does. They're not thinking about what's best right now they're thinking about what's going to be the winning move in the future and their brand. NVA leadership is well connected and I’m sure will do plenty of research if they do decide to make the move.
Exactly and parents like us are thinking about whats best right now and will absolutely take our ball and $$ elsewhere. Bad enough yall aren’t really developing the girls. Add the age group blow ups and what do you really have? That middle finger to the girls will be returned. Rest assured… we are already losing players as is…..
On that note a certain clubs social media presence is going to get a lot better while another one turns back into a toad.
Ifynyn
Hurry up and announce…..
Anonymous wrote:whut?!Anonymous wrote:NVA is looking down the road and where the best platforms will be for their players for exposure and recruiting. If they think MLSN + GA will be the bigger deal than ECNL + ECNL, they'll make the switch right away to position themselves first before any of their competition does. They're not thinking about what's best right now they're thinking about what's going to be the winning move in the future and their brand. NVA leadership is well connected and I’m sure will do plenty of research if they do decide to make the move.
Exactly and parents like us are thinking about whats best right now and will absolutely take our ball and $$ elsewhere. Bad enough yall aren’t really developing the girls. Add the age group blow ups and what do you really have? That middle finger to the girls will be returned. Rest assured… we are already losing players as is…..
On that note a certain clubs social media presence is going to get a lot better while another one turns back into a toad.
Ifynyn
Hurry up and announce…..
Anonymous wrote:So funny this seems to be a girls side argument. Hands down boys side is better at SYC. MLSnext attracts the elite boys side. They will sacrifice girls side if it improves boys side.
whut?!Anonymous wrote:NVA is looking down the road and where the best platforms will be for their players for exposure and recruiting. If they think MLSN + GA will be the bigger deal than ECNL + ECNL, they'll make the switch right away to position themselves first before any of their competition does. They're not thinking about what's best right now they're thinking about what's going to be the winning move in the future and their brand. NVA leadership is well connected and I’m sure will do plenty of research if they do decide to make the move.
Anonymous wrote:Your post would be so much better if you could make a point without offending everyone you are talking about. It’s kind of a turn off.
And let’s be honest, your opinion of coaches is based off of very limited knowledge so no one takes your statement seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Right excatly, none of those top 4-5 spots were filled by any of the top players in the area. They were filled by girls who probably knew that they weren't going to make Arlington or NVA, and the left overs that were passed over went to VRSC, bottom of VDA, or bottom of FVUAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You folks are exaggerating. Syc had the opposite effect starting with the 2012 group. Girls flocked
You're exaggerating. None of the top players from any of the top teams "Flocked" to SYC. Ok so they added girls who couldn't/didn't make any of the top ECNL teams.
False. Big showing at the 2012 SYC GA ID which preceded the ECNL IDs. There were 4-5 slots to fill so only a few offers went out. Some of those who were passed over made VDA and FVU. Facts.
Right excatly, none of those top 4-5 spots were filled by any of the top players in the area. They were filled by girls who probably knew that they weren't going to make Arlington or NVA, and the left overs that were passed over went to VRSC, bottom of VDA, or bottom of FVUAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You folks are exaggerating. Syc had the opposite effect starting with the 2012 group. Girls flocked
You're exaggerating. None of the top players from any of the top teams "Flocked" to SYC. Ok so they added girls who couldn't/didn't make any of the top ECNL teams.
False. Big showing at the 2012 SYC GA ID which preceded the ECNL IDs. There were 4-5 slots to fill so only a few offers went out. Some of those who were passed over made VDA and FVU. Facts.
Anonymous wrote:NVA is looking down the road and where the best platforms will be for their players for exposure and recruiting. If they think MLSN + GA will be the bigger deal than ECNL + ECNL, they'll make the switch right away to position themselves first before any of their competition does. They're not thinking about what's best right now they're thinking about what's going to be the winning move in the future and their brand. NVA leadership is well connected and I’m sure will do plenty of research if they do decide to make the move.