Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? I looked up and DC is ranked #16 in education in the country. That’s not a bad rank.
The top 10 best educated states are all blue states. It won’t change them. The poor states like Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, etc will be negatively affected.
https://scholaroo.com/report/state-education-rankings/
New York is ranked 6th.
California is ranked 40th.
Top 14 out of 15 are blue and the 15th is purple state.
This is because the higher rated states have some combination of old money, Jewish, and Asian households. If those people all moved to the south, those states would skyrocket in ranking.
Clearly you were educated in a red state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can he also eliminate the Department of Agriculture so we can stop subsidizing red state farmers?
Yes! I have a garden. Bootstraps!
While we're on this topic, since so many Americans have guns, why not get rid of the DoD as well? It accounts for a big chunk of our budget and is staffed by lots of MAGA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all act like we didn’t have schools prior to the department of Ed’s creation in 1970s. Since its implementation, billions spent and objectively worse educational outcomes across the board.
+1
It’s so bad.
That’s why all the dcum moms fight like heck to send their kids to private schools.
There’s entire forums here dedicated to getting their kids into private schools because public schools are so poorly run, dangerous, etc, and the quality of education so abysmal.
Total hypocrites.
Send your children to public school, run by the DOE. You won’t! You’d rather die.
For the millionth effing time: the Federal DOE does not set curriculums for local schools. If your schools suck it's because of the state or local board, combined with - I'll say it - bad parenting that doesn't value education.
But they do, sort of. For one, DOE created No Child Left Behind, which forced every single public school in every state to make standardized tests the focus of the curriculum, and then report those results to the DOE and face punishment for not scoring high enough. Then they put out Common Core (a curriculum) and forced us all to align with that to one degree or another. The current state of education - abysmal - was nearly entirely shaped by the testing policies of NCLB, which teachers said then and are still saying did tremendous damage to the system, and to students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So no more special education, no more FAFSA, no more Pell Grants.
I guess the goal is to keep everyone stupid and poor.
💯
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all act like we didn’t have schools prior to the department of Ed’s creation in 1970s. Since its implementation, billions spent and objectively worse educational outcomes across the board.
+1
It’s so bad.
That’s why all the dcum moms fight like heck to send their kids to private schools.
There’s entire forums here dedicated to getting their kids into private schools because public schools are so poorly run, dangerous, etc, and the quality of education so abysmal.
Total hypocrites.
Send your children to public school, run by the DOE. You won’t! You’d rather die.
For the millionth effing time: the Federal DOE does not set curriculums for local schools. If your schools suck it's because of the state or local board, combined with - I'll say it - bad parenting that doesn't value education.
Department of Education should have been eliminated long ago. The only reason it exists is to use federal grants to coerce local school districts into conforming to a leftist political agenda, and to serve as a centralized authority to push leftism nationwide.
Anonymous wrote:So no more special education, no more FAFSA, no more Pell Grants.
I guess the goal is to keep everyone stupid and poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all act like we didn’t have schools prior to the department of Ed’s creation in 1970s. Since its implementation, billions spent and objectively worse educational outcomes across the board.
+1
It’s so bad.
That’s why all the dcum moms fight like heck to send their kids to private schools.
There’s entire forums here dedicated to getting their kids into private schools because public schools are so poorly run, dangerous, etc, and the quality of education so abysmal.
Total hypocrites.
Send your children to public school, run by the DOE. You won’t! You’d rather die.
For the millionth effing time: the Federal DOE does not set curriculums for local schools. If your schools suck it's because of the state or local board, combined with - I'll say it - bad parenting that doesn't value education.
Department of Education should have been eliminated long ago. The only reason it exists is to use federal grants to coerce local school districts into conforming to a leftist political agenda, and to serve as a centralized authority to push leftism nationwide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So blue states aren't going to be subsidizing education in poor red states anymore? Okay. I guess that's what's happening.
To keep the Republican voter pipeline of morons
Have they thought about what jobs the huge class of undereducated are going to qualify for in twenty years? Jobs are becoming more technical or eliminated and filled by machines. There will be more and more angry, poor incels. What’s in it for the 1%?
Aren’t they going to pick the oranges?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all act like we didn’t have schools prior to the department of Ed’s creation in 1970s. Since its implementation, billions spent and objectively worse educational outcomes across the board.
+1
It’s so bad.
That’s why all the dcum moms fight like heck to send their kids to private schools.
There’s entire forums here dedicated to getting their kids into private schools because public schools are so poorly run, dangerous, etc, and the quality of education so abysmal.
Total hypocrites.
Send your children to public school, run by the DOE. You won’t! You’d rather die.
For the millionth effing time: the Federal DOE does not set curriculums for local schools. If your schools suck it's because of the state or local board, combined with - I'll say it - bad parenting that doesn't value education.
But they do, sort of. For one, DOE created No Child Left Behind, which forced every single public school in every state to make standardized tests the focus of the curriculum, and then report those results to the DOE and face punishment for not scoring high enough. Then they put out Common Core (a curriculum) and forced us all to align with that to one degree or another. The current state of education - abysmal - was nearly entirely shaped by the testing policies of NCLB, which teachers said then and are still saying did tremendous damage to the system, and to students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all act like we didn’t have schools prior to the department of Ed’s creation in 1970s. Since its implementation, billions spent and objectively worse educational outcomes across the board.
+1
It’s so bad.
That’s why all the dcum moms fight like heck to send their kids to private schools.
There’s entire forums here dedicated to getting their kids into private schools because public schools are so poorly run, dangerous, etc, and the quality of education so abysmal.
Total hypocrites.
Send your children to public school, run by the DOE. You won’t! You’d rather die.
For the millionth effing time: the Federal DOE does not set curriculums for local schools. If your schools suck it's because of the state or local board, combined with - I'll say it - bad parenting that doesn't value education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So blue states aren't going to be subsidizing education in poor red states anymore? Okay. I guess that's what's happening.
To keep the Republican voter pipeline of morons
Have they thought about what jobs the huge class of undereducated are going to qualify for in twenty years? Jobs are becoming more technical or eliminated and filled by machines. There will be more and more angry, poor incels. What’s in it for the 1%?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why? I looked up and DC is ranked #16 in education in the country. That’s not a bad rank.
The top 10 best educated states are all blue states. It won’t change them. The poor states like Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, etc will be negatively affected.
https://scholaroo.com/report/state-education-rankings/
New York is ranked 6th.
California is ranked 40th.
Top 14 out of 15 are blue and the 15th is purple state.
This is because the higher rated states have some combination of old money, Jewish, and Asian households. If those people all moved to the south, those states would skyrocket in ranking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You all act like we didn’t have schools prior to the department of Ed’s creation in 1970s. Since its implementation, billions spent and objectively worse educational outcomes across the board.
+1
It’s so bad.
That’s why all the dcum moms fight like heck to send their kids to private schools.
There’s entire forums here dedicated to getting their kids into private schools because public schools are so poorly run, dangerous, etc, and the quality of education so abysmal.
Total hypocrites.
Send your children to public school, run by the DOE. You won’t! You’d rather die.
For the millionth effing time: the Federal DOE does not set curriculums for local schools. If your schools suck it's because of the state or local board, combined with - I'll say it - bad parenting that doesn't value education.
Department of Education should have been eliminated long ago. The only reason it exists is to use federal grants to coerce local school districts into conforming to a leftist political agenda, and to serve as a centralized authority to push leftism nationwide.