Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How many millions were blown on Cardi B, Lizzo, Beyoncé, and Eminem to say a few words? Lizzo may have performed, not sure?
I’d bet the appearance fees for each were $2M+. Presumably Swift was also paid millions for her endorsement?
maybe this will end the celebrity endorsements. they didn’t sway me and just ended up annoying me
Anonymous wrote:Hate to break it to y'all but more than a billion was spent on the Trump side as well, particularly with everything from Musk etc.
And Trump's campaign did it with a whole lot less transparency.
Anonymous wrote:How many millions were blown on Cardi B, Lizzo, Beyoncé, and Eminem to say a few words? Lizzo may have performed, not sure?
I’d bet the appearance fees for each were $2M+. Presumably Swift was also paid millions for her endorsement?
Anonymous wrote:such a horrific waste of money think of all the people could have fed with that. all that money and still lost horribly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?
I’m not missing your point about Kamala but Trump’s felonies were based on the fact that he did Not list the NDA as a campaign expense and they said he should have.
This is the reason why it will be successful on appeal. They turned a Federal FEC violation into a state criminal fraud felony. And 34 of them from one action.
Did they? We only know that Trump covered up something which is a felony but we don't what Trump covered up. The underlying crime was never proven.
All you need is intent to commit a crime, which was proven
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am so naive.
I did not know that all of those celebrities were paid to show up and endorse a politician. I truly believed that they were showing up because they believed in the candidate/Harris.
Most celebrities were not paid. It’s a Trumpster narrative. Some small influencers were like brand deals, which they must disclose. The disclosures don’t show a payment to Beyoncé, for example.
Well, there's some BS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?
I’m not missing your point about Kamala but Trump’s felonies were based on the fact that he did Not list the NDA as a campaign expense and they said he should have.
This is the reason why it will be successful on appeal. They turned a Federal FEC violation into a state criminal fraud felony. And 34 of them from one action.
Did they? We only know that Trump covered up something which is a felony but we don't what Trump covered up. The underlying crime was never proven.
All you need is intent to commit a crime, which was proven
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?
I’m not missing your point about Kamala but Trump’s felonies were based on the fact that he did Not list the NDA as a campaign expense and they said he should have.
This is the reason why it will be successful on appeal. They turned a Federal FEC violation into a state criminal fraud felony. And 34 of them from one action.
Did they? We only know that Trump covered up something which is a felony but we don't what Trump covered up. The underlying crime was never proven.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?
I’m not missing your point about Kamala but Trump’s felonies were based on the fact that he did Not list the NDA as a campaign expense and they said he should have.
This is the reason why it will be successful on appeal. They turned a Federal FEC violation into a state criminal fraud felony. And 34 of them from one action.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?
I’m not missing your point about Kamala but Trump’s felonies were based on the fact that he did Not list the NDA as a campaign expense and they said he should have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?
I’m not missing your point about Kamala but Trump’s felonies were based on the fact that he did Not list the NDA as a campaign expense and they said he should have.
Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?
Anonymous wrote:Trump’s so called “felony” was using campaign funds for an impermissible purpose, i.e., an NDA. I wonder how many violations would be found if the $1 billion that Kamala spent were audited?