Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scranton parent here. I'll agree that it fits the criteria of a hidden gem. I'm sure a lot of DCUM parents think they would never send their kid to Scranton. We have five kids (yep, Catholic) and so keeping costs manageable was a high priority. My DC got huge merit aid. They're in the business school and have had no trouble securing internships. (That was one of our concerns.) Super, super happy, with an intramural sport, friends, study abroad. It's a really nice school.
FWIW, first two kids went to Penn State. This one wanted a small environment.
My son loved Scranton when we visited. We are not Catholic and not from PA, but we all really liked it. He didn’t get enough interest from the coach of the sport he wants to play, so he decided not to risk putting his eggs in that basket and is EDing elsewhere.
He also loved Wooster, and is EDing to another school mentioned in this thread, so I guess my kid is fond of “hidden gems.”
Anonymous wrote:Scranton parent here. I'll agree that it fits the criteria of a hidden gem. I'm sure a lot of DCUM parents think they would never send their kid to Scranton. We have five kids (yep, Catholic) and so keeping costs manageable was a high priority. My DC got huge merit aid. They're in the business school and have had no trouble securing internships. (That was one of our concerns.) Super, super happy, with an intramural sport, friends, study abroad. It's a really nice school.
FWIW, first two kids went to Penn State. This one wanted a small environment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For this region: Indiana/Bloomington, Colorado/Boulder, Arizona, Iowa, Oregon, New Hampshire. All are good state flagships, with solid programs, attractive campuses, nice towns, and a mix of in-state and OOS students. And each has an acceptance rate above 79% (... because some students don't have a serious shot at Harvard or UCLA or maybe even College Park). As a native Californian, it's surprised me how quickly people in this region (who aren't resource-constrained) are prepared to write off those fine state flagships based on either their stereotyped image of the state (despite university towns usually being political anomalies, wherever they're located), or the duration of the plane ride, or the assumption that a high acceptance rate must automatically mean sub-par education quality. And they instead start adjusting their sights to lesser state schools (esp in the mid-Atlantic or South), or to second-tier/regional campuses, or to financially weak SLACs -- all located within a state or two of DC. Californians think nothing of traveling a time zone or more away for college - why is that here in the DMV people seem to think that's something you'd only ever do for a "T20" school?
I think after covid some people don't like the idea of their kid being stranded 2,000 miles away. I pretty much agree with you though. We are looking at most of the schools you listed.
You mean their adult? Jesus Christ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid's college list year: (accepted and toured)
St Mary's
Washington College
Washington & Jefferson
Wooster
Allegheny
Sweet Briar
She liked Allegheny the best and seems very happy there. I liked them all. It was a nice problem to have!
Wooster is fantastic. It's profiled extensively in Ron Lieber's book, The Price You Pay for College, and the college guide, Colleges Worth Your Money. This school is the real deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Scranton parent here. I'll agree that it fits the criteria of a hidden gem. I'm sure a lot of DCUM parents think they would never send their kid to Scranton. We have five kids (yep, Catholic) and so keeping costs manageable was a high priority. My DC got huge merit aid. They're in the business school and have had no trouble securing internships. (That was one of our concerns.) Super, super happy, with an intramural sport, friends, study abroad. It's a really nice school.
FWIW, first two kids went to Penn State. This one wanted a small environment.
Are you in PA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For this region: Indiana/Bloomington, Colorado/Boulder, Arizona, Iowa, Oregon, New Hampshire. All are good state flagships, with solid programs, attractive campuses, nice towns, and a mix of in-state and OOS students. And each has an acceptance rate above 79% (... because some students don't have a serious shot at Harvard or UCLA or maybe even College Park). As a native Californian, it's surprised me how quickly people in this region (who aren't resource-constrained) are prepared to write off those fine state flagships based on either their stereotyped image of the state (despite university towns usually being political anomalies, wherever they're located), or the duration of the plane ride, or the assumption that a high acceptance rate must automatically mean sub-par education quality. And they instead start adjusting their sights to lesser state schools (esp in the mid-Atlantic or South), or to second-tier/regional campuses, or to financially weak SLACs -- all located within a state or two of DC. Californians think nothing of traveling a time zone or more away for college - why is that here in the DMV people seem to think that's something you'd only ever do for a "T20" school?
I think after covid some people don't like the idea of their kid being stranded 2,000 miles away. I pretty much agree with you though. We are looking at most of the schools you listed.
You mean their adult? Jesus Christ.
Calm down.
Many people talk about their kids or how many children they have even after the offspring reach 18. It really is okay.
Maybe you should try meditation?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For this region: Indiana/Bloomington, Colorado/Boulder, Arizona, Iowa, Oregon, New Hampshire. All are good state flagships, with solid programs, attractive campuses, nice towns, and a mix of in-state and OOS students. And each has an acceptance rate above 79% (... because some students don't have a serious shot at Harvard or UCLA or maybe even College Park). As a native Californian, it's surprised me how quickly people in this region (who aren't resource-constrained) are prepared to write off those fine state flagships based on either their stereotyped image of the state (despite university towns usually being political anomalies, wherever they're located), or the duration of the plane ride, or the assumption that a high acceptance rate must automatically mean sub-par education quality. And they instead start adjusting their sights to lesser state schools (esp in the mid-Atlantic or South), or to second-tier/regional campuses, or to financially weak SLACs -- all located within a state or two of DC. Californians think nothing of traveling a time zone or more away for college - why is that here in the DMV people seem to think that's something you'd only ever do for a "T20" school?
I think after covid some people don't like the idea of their kid being stranded 2,000 miles away. I pretty much agree with you though. We are looking at most of the schools you listed.
You mean their adult? Jesus Christ.