Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You’re an assh***. I hope everyone reads you to filth. Many elderly have mobility challenges for many reasons, as do young DISABLED people, not for reasons having anything to do with how they behaved or lived at any point in their lives. Seriously, you are the worst and your parents must be so ashamed. No wonder they wouldn’t let you move in or help you with a down payment.
You people act like there are no old people anywhere else in the world. Old people exist in places with townhouses and apartments all over the world. They somehow manage to get around without a 5,000 pound SUV parked six feet from their door. What makes Arlington Olds, who I am told are the healthiest, so particularly special that they won't be able to handle walking a little bit?
Why are retirement communities almost entirely built with "Missing Middle" housing? Its actually easier for Olds to get around by foot and golf cart than having them drive into their local grocery store with a giant truck.
None of that is what I was responding to, rather to the attack from someone who blamed being infirm solely on the housing or vehicle choices someone made at some point in their lives.
For what it’s worth, my dream is to retire to a Pre-War in Manhattan. My parents, however, want to leave their home feet first. I’m not sure why you’re intent on making an enemy of people who supports a lot of what you’re talking about without agreeing that all SFH zoning needs to be eliminated. But, take the L I guess.
Let's keep in mind it was the Nimbys that dragged the Olds off their mobility scooters to use as human shields. Let's also keep in mind we just went through a couple years where we sacrificed young people for the sake of the Olds, with disastrous consequences for the nation.
So I'll just ask what do you want young families to do? Live an hour+ from work and never see each other? Live in cramped and run down apartments? What is the logic in having empty nesters in the best housing in the county?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You’re an assh***. I hope everyone reads you to filth. Many elderly have mobility challenges for many reasons, as do young DISABLED people, not for reasons having anything to do with how they behaved or lived at any point in their lives. Seriously, you are the worst and your parents must be so ashamed. No wonder they wouldn’t let you move in or help you with a down payment.
You people act like there are no old people anywhere else in the world. Old people exist in places with townhouses and apartments all over the world. They somehow manage to get around without a 5,000 pound SUV parked six feet from their door. What makes Arlington Olds, who I am told are the healthiest, so particularly special that they won't be able to handle walking a little bit?
Why are retirement communities almost entirely built with "Missing Middle" housing? Its actually easier for Olds to get around by foot and golf cart than having them drive into their local grocery store with a giant truck.
None of that is what I was responding to, rather to the attack from someone who blamed being infirm solely on the housing or vehicle choices someone made at some point in their lives.
For what it’s worth, my dream is to retire to a Pre-War in Manhattan. My parents, however, want to leave their home feet first. I’m not sure why you’re intent on making an enemy of people who supports a lot of what you’re talking about without agreeing that all SFH zoning needs to be eliminated. But, take the L I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You’re an assh***. I hope everyone reads you to filth. Many elderly have mobility challenges for many reasons, as do young DISABLED people, not for reasons having anything to do with how they behaved or lived at any point in their lives. Seriously, you are the worst and your parents must be so ashamed. No wonder they wouldn’t let you move in or help you with a down payment.
You people act like there are no old people anywhere else in the world. Old people exist in places with townhouses and apartments all over the world. They somehow manage to get around without a 5,000 pound SUV parked six feet from their door. What makes Arlington Olds, who I am told are the healthiest, so particularly special that they won't be able to handle walking a little bit?
Why are retirement communities almost entirely built with "Missing Middle" housing? Its actually easier for Olds to get around by foot and golf cart than having them drive into their local grocery store with a giant truck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
How does someone sacrifice and “work their tail off” for sidewalks and wind farms? That’s total disingenuous NIMBY bullsh*t. You don’t believe people need to work for themselves - if you did, you’d never try to legally block what they do with *their own property.* What you want is to control what happens to property and public spaces that you *never worked for*. So stfu about “hard work.”
There is a specific, yet to be named type of psychological rage that exists amongst nonprofit workers and humanities degree holders when they reach adulthood and realize they cannot have the same types of things that their peers who went into business, law, STEM, etc. It is sad to
to watch.
That’s a weird projection, considering that you’re mad you couldn’t buy up all your neighbors property.
It’s being bought up by developers who majored in business.
And many are also engineers. This is good because Arlington County staff has no idea how to implement most policies, including MM. Builders had to sit with them and explain the geometry of placing properties on lots, how to add more parking, fire marshal height requirements, etc.
how exactly do you think they manage all the major construction in Ballston etc? NIMBYs are hilarious with all of the transparently fake arguments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You’re an assh***. I hope everyone reads you to filth. Many elderly have mobility challenges for many reasons, as do young DISABLED people, not for reasons having anything to do with how they behaved or lived at any point in their lives. Seriously, you are the worst and your parents must be so ashamed. No wonder they wouldn’t let you move in or help you with a down payment.
You people act like there are no old people anywhere else in the world. Old people exist in places with townhouses and apartments all over the world. They somehow manage to get around without a 5,000 pound SUV parked six feet from their door. What makes Arlington Olds, who I am told are the healthiest, so particularly special that they won't be able to handle walking a little bit?
Why are retirement communities almost entirely built with "Missing Middle" housing? Its actually easier for Olds to get around by foot and golf cart than having them drive into their local grocery store with a giant truck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You’re an assh***. I hope everyone reads you to filth. Many elderly have mobility challenges for many reasons, as do young DISABLED people, not for reasons having anything to do with how they behaved or lived at any point in their lives. Seriously, you are the worst and your parents must be so ashamed. No wonder they wouldn’t let you move in or help you with a down payment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
Anonymous wrote:a property light to the sun. man homeowners are entitled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You are absolutely ridiculous and hate elderly people. Are you going to blame them for having dementia and cancer next? Arlington is one of the healthiest county’s in the US and it has a life expectancy more 6 six years longer than the US average that is comparable to Japan. People living here take very good care of their health a nd you should not be victim blaming people for age-related disabilities.
They're just self-righteous jerks. None of their policy arguments have been based on substance so it's no surprise that their insults are the same.
true. the well known housing affordability crisis was completely made up by millenials that want to steal your propery rights by (checks notes) letting others develop their own property into small apartment buildings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You are absolutely ridiculous and hate elderly people. Are you going to blame them for having dementia and cancer next? Arlington is one of the healthiest county’s in the US and it has a life expectancy more 6 six years longer than the US average that is comparable to Japan. People living here take very good care of their health a nd you should not be victim blaming people for age-related disabilities.
They're just self-righteous jerks. None of their policy arguments have been based on substance so it's no surprise that their insults are the same.
true. the well known housing affordability crisis was completely made up by millenials that want to steal your propery rights by (checks notes) letting others develop their own property into small apartment buildings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nimbys are the worst. Seriously. You’re ruining this country.
How is this ruining the country? Because people need to live in areas that comport with their affordability instead of the government trying to get everyone a prize at the expense of current homeowners? No one has a right to live in Arlington. It’s a very nice and expensive place.
I would love a house in Newport Beach. I can’t afford a $8M house so I don’t live there.
because EVERYTHING that is a common good gets opposed by NIMBYs. Preschools, high schools, sidewalks, solar powed, waste treatment plants …
The best thing for the common hood would be for people to understand that if you want something nice in this country you have to sacrifice and work your tail off. In an era of student loan forgiveness, free housing for illegal immigrants, and countless other government giveaways it’s gotten totally out of control.
This is why there is a huge disconnect with some liberals in Arlington, extremely socially liberal, but also believe what you said above that you should work hard to get to where you are and should enjoy the benefits of that hard work. They’re happy to donate their hard earned money to those less fortunate, but don’t want them living next-door.
It’s not surprising that a generation of young people who grew up getting participation trophies would have no shame in thinking they deserve to live in close-in high income neighborhoods. The lack of self awareness is galling.
Devils advocate, why does someone who can’t afford it think they should “deserve” to live in a particular neighborhood?
They were raised as upper middle class kids by boomer parents who worked hard to accomplish a good life for them. Many were in the first generation to earn college degrees and ground through college on the GI bill or through night school, including law school. They wanted their kids to have what they missed and encouraged them to follow their passions. The kids did so but the passion does not pay enough to have the kind of life they had as a kid.
This is so true. Yimbys are a bunch of people with useless degrees and too much student loan debt that made bad life decisions.
there’s nothing more pathetic than an old boomer refusing to change and holding on to his broke down ratty SFH with no sidewalk as if it were Versailles.
DP. This comment shows the entitlement and disdain YIMBYs have for working and middle class SFH homeowners, suggesting that our modest homes are unworthy of existing and are just “tear downs”. For so many of us, this home is our dwelling and an investment in our now and our future. It took us years - for some, decades - to save for these homes. And yet YIMBYs not only mock our homes but demand they have instant access to homes without any of the hard work it takes to save for one.
So much for the YIMBY concern for the middle classes …. The same homeowners the PP mocks above.
YIMBYs and Density Bros are openly ageist, mocking people as the “Olds”, and dismissing their mobility challenges which require driving. I’ve seen long time residents dismissed with “why don’t you move to Leisure World”?
To be fair, many of the "Olds" have mobility challenges because they live in SFHs and drive everywhere. Maybe if they had actually used their legs at any point in the last 50 years, they wouldn't have mobility challenges. And maybe, just maybe, we should stop consigning future generations do early disability by automobile?
You are absolutely ridiculous and hate elderly people. Are you going to blame them for having dementia and cancer next? Arlington is one of the healthiest county’s in the US and it has a life expectancy more 6 six years longer than the US average that is comparable to Japan. People living here take very good care of their health and you should not be victim blaming people for age-related disabilities.
I don't see how you can argue that Arlington is as healthy as Japan, but we can't build anything in Arlington because the Olds need to drive within 6 feet of their destination. Old people in Japan walk everywhere, why can't Arlington olds?