Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is the CEO of a midsized firm earning $1 million a year "closer" to the low income worker earning $30,000 than the hedge fund manager earning $100 million a year?
After all, 1,000,000 - 30,000 = 970,000
100,000,000 - 2,000,000 = 99,000,000
True wealth is the ability to not need to work a job either way. Neither is “wealthy”.
We have a $2-3m HHI. I always tell my kids that we are not rich because they have to work to support themselves. Rich people don’t have to work. While we have enough saved to send them to college and grad school, they are on their own to support themselves and their future families.
My one kid says we are the lowest of the rich. This is very true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is the CEO of a midsized firm earning $1 million a year "closer" to the low income worker earning $30,000 than the hedge fund manager earning $100 million a year?
After all, 1,000,000 - 30,000 = 970,000
100,000,000 - 2,000,000 = 99,000,000
True wealth is the ability to not need to work a job either way. Neither is “wealthy”.
We have a $2-3m HHI. I always tell my kids that we are not rich because they have to work to support themselves. Rich people don’t have to work. While we have enough saved to send them to college and grad school, they are on their own to support themselves and their future families.
My one kid says we are the lowest of the rich. This is very true.
Anonymous wrote:So is the CEO of a midsized firm earning $1 million a year "closer" to the low income worker earning $30,000 than the hedge fund manager earning $100 million a year?
After all, 1,000,000 - 30,000 = 970,000
100,000,000 - 2,000,000 = 99,000,000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is the CEO of a midsized firm earning $1 million a year "closer" to the low income worker earning $30,000 than the hedge fund manager earning $100 million a year?
After all, 1,000,000 - 30,000 = 970,000
100,000,000 - 2,000,000 = 99,000,000
True wealth is the ability to not need to work a job either way. Neither is “wealthy”.
We have a $2-3m HHI. I always tell my kids that we are not rich because they have to work to support themselves. Rich people don’t have to work. While we have enough saved to send them to college and grad school, they are on their own to support themselves and their future families.
My one kid says we are the lowest of the rich. This is very true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is the CEO of a midsized firm earning $1 million a year "closer" to the low income worker earning $30,000 than the hedge fund manager earning $100 million a year?
After all, 1,000,000 - 30,000 = 970,000
100,000,000 - 2,000,000 = 99,000,000
True wealth is the ability to not need to work a job either way. Neither is “wealthy”.
Anonymous wrote:So is the CEO of a midsized firm earning $1 million a year "closer" to the low income worker earning $30,000 than the hedge fund manager earning $100 million a year?
After all, 1,000,000 - 30,000 = 970,000
100,000,000 - 2,000,000 = 99,000,000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/line-between-middle-class-upper-110130857.html
Varies by state.
I love that you provided actual data.
Short version - upper middle class ends around 200k in DC/MD/VA (175 in Virginia as whole, NoVa would probably be closer to 200k)
Oh yay! DH and I with our 290k HHI from 2 fed salaries and our 2,300 sq ft 1940s rambler, and 529s that will hopefully cover state schools someday are upper class! I’m so excited to hear this. We are basically the same as the people who own second homes in Nantucket and spend their breaks aboard yachts.
Yes, you are upper class. Sorry if that offends you. Does that mean you are obscenely wealthy? Not it does not. But 95 percent of households in the US make less than yours does. I don't know how much more plainly it can be put. You (like me in my similar circumstances) are upper class.
Yeah but the wage gap between the 95% and the 50% is multitudes closer than the 95% and 1%.
Someone making 300k/year is living a much closer lifestyle compared to a family making 125k/year than a family making $5M year with tons of investments etc. Also the family making 300k could become the family making 125k through some unfortunate circumstances. The 300k family is highly unlikely to ever make anywhere near the 1%.
300k is not that far from the 1%.
"According to the US Census Bureau's 2020 Current Population Survey, the percentage of American households with incomes of $300,000 or more is about 3.8%. This means that approximately 3.8% of American households have an annual income of at least $300,000 before taxes and other deductions.""
And 125K? That's about the 75th percentile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Class is more about lifestyle than income and assets. Most places in the US, we would have a more upper class lifestyle, but we live close to DC and so we’re UMC.
UMC - we own our home and drive well maintained, reliable cars. We go on 1-2 vacations a year and pay for travel sports and music lessons for kids in local public schools. We own stocks and we save money for retirement and college. We work in white-collar knowledge based jobs. We have investments and will inherit money, but we will need to work full time until a traditional retirement age of 65.
Upper class is like UMC but has 2 or more of the following:
kids in private school
2nd home
2+ vacations, some international or luxury accommodations
Doesn’t need to work a W-2 job or is able to work a passion job
Home is professionally decorated and/or landscaped
Makes most decisions based on personal preferences instead of cost/value/ROI
Really this is the key piece.
I'm sorry, but if you can't afford to maintain your lifestyle if you stop working, you're not UC.
Middle class is like UMC except instead of being a relaxing, enjoyable lifestyle they have to budget carefully to make it all work. They make choices between retirement and college saving. They may have to choose between expensive extracurriculars for the kids and vacations. If they don’t make sacrifices or trade offs, they are living in debt or can never retire.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/line-between-middle-class-upper-110130857.html
Varies by state.
I love that you provided actual data.
Short version - upper middle class ends around 200k in DC/MD/VA (175 in Virginia as whole, NoVa would probably be closer to 200k)
Oh yay! DH and I with our 290k HHI from 2 fed salaries and our 2,300 sq ft 1940s rambler, and 529s that will hopefully cover state schools someday are upper class! I’m so excited to hear this. We are basically the same as the people who own second homes in Nantucket and spend their breaks aboard yachts.
Yes, you are upper class. Sorry if that offends you. Does that mean you are obscenely wealthy? Not it does not. But 95 percent of households in the US make less than yours does. I don't know how much more plainly it can be put. You (like me in my similar circumstances) are upper class.
Yeah but the wage gap between the 95% and the 50% is multitudes closer than the 95% and 1%.
Someone making 300k/year is living a much closer lifestyle compared to a family making 125k/year than a family making $5M year with tons of investments etc. Also the family making 300k could become the family making 125k through some unfortunate circumstances. The 300k family is highly unlikely to ever make anywhere near the 1%.
300k is not that far from the 1%.
"According to the US Census Bureau's 2020 Current Population Survey, the percentage of American households with incomes of $300,000 or more is about 3.8%. This means that approximately 3.8% of American households have an annual income of at least $300,000 before taxes and other deductions.""
And 125K? That's about the 75th percentile.
Anonymous wrote:Living "normally" how? Do you get worried every month with your bills and you've maxed your credit card? Are you worried that you won't have enough money for retirement because you don't have savings, investments or good pensions?
But in the bubble you live in, precariousness is abnormal. Even though the precariat in this country outnumbers people like you by about 5 to 1.
Anonymous wrote:Is there a "class difference" between the 300K-ish family where it's two earners with similar incomes and the household where it's all or virtually all the income comes from the main breadwinner?
For context, about 2% of individuals (not households) earn over $250,000 or more per year.
I think any household where at least one person earns $250K is part of the upper class. If you had the spouses of those very high earners plus those with a certain net worth threshold (maybe $3 million?) you'd probably get like 3-4% of the population.