Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So gross. Most of them are maga. Ick.
Nice to see a democrat supporting our troops.
Would you also say they are losers and suckers?
President Biden supports the troops. Both of his sons served
Funny you say that since the white House is the only thing holding this bill back right now.
It's probably a lot more complex than that - because I'll bet that the Republicans are saying "to give DoD the extra 19.5% you need to take all of that funding away from other agencies" while already proposing deep cuts to those agencies without the military pay funding.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So gross. Most of them are maga. Ick.
Nice to see a democrat supporting our troops.
Would you also say they are losers and suckers?
President Biden supports the troops. Both of his sons served
Funny you say that since the white House is the only thing holding this bill back right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So gross. Most of them are maga. Ick.
Nice to see a democrat supporting our troops.
Would you also say they are losers and suckers?
President Biden supports the troops. Both of his sons served
Funny you say that since the white House is the only thing holding this bill back right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So gross. Most of them are maga. Ick.
Nice to see a democrat supporting our troops.
Would you also say they are losers and suckers?
President Biden supports the troops. Both of his sons served
Funny you say that since the white House is the only thing holding this bill back right now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So gross. Most of them are maga. Ick.
Nice to see a democrat supporting our troops.
Would you also say they are losers and suckers?
President Biden supports the troops. Both of his sons served
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me: was BAH always intended to cover 100% of the housing cost in any given location?
I ask because I have had friends based here in DC/NoVA who bought a home in this area and the BAH frequently did NOT cover the full monthly expense of their mortgage payment.
My guess is that the big jump in interest rates out-sped any typical rise in the BAH. It seems that BAH is what needs to be increased and should probably change on a more dynamic basis (i.e., automatically recalibrated every 6 months based on localized housing surveys).
No, I don't think it was ever intended to cover the whole cost of housing, but it almost certainly is less now with inflation. I was formerly in the military and I always had to live with housemates to stay under the BAH.
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me: was BAH always intended to cover 100% of the housing cost in any given location?
I ask because I have had friends based here in DC/NoVA who bought a home in this area and the BAH frequently did NOT cover the full monthly expense of their mortgage payment.
My guess is that the big jump in interest rates out-sped any typical rise in the BAH. It seems that BAH is what needs to be increased and should probably change on a more dynamic basis (i.e., automatically recalibrated every 6 months based on localized housing surveys).
Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me: was BAH always intended to cover 100% of the housing cost in any given location?
I ask because I have had friends based here in DC/NoVA who bought a home in this area and the BAH frequently did NOT cover the full monthly expense of their mortgage payment.
My guess is that the big jump in interest rates out-sped any typical rise in the BAH. It seems that BAH is what needs to be increased and should probably change on a more dynamic basis (i.e., automatically recalibrated every 6 months based on localized housing surveys).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can someone explain to me: was BAH always intended to cover 100% of the housing cost in any given location?
I ask because I have had friends based here in DC/NoVA who bought a home in this area and the BAH frequently did NOT cover the full monthly expense of their mortgage payment.
My guess is that the big jump in interest rates out-sped any typical rise in the BAH. It seems that BAH is what needs to be increased and should probably change on a more dynamic basis (i.e., automatically recalibrated every 6 months based on localized housing surveys).
Hey, that's socialism! Why the hell are you MAGAs in support of socialism!