Anonymous wrote:She is as complicit in the lies about Biden's cognitive condition as the rest of the WH advisors and Biden's family.

She had to see the decline. And, if she didn't know, she is even more clueless than she appears to be.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would FAR rather lose to Trump having taken a risk to field a new candidate, than lose to Trump fielding Biden.

It's the difference between courage and cowardice. Right and wrong. The GOP is irredeemable with their Trump obsession, but the Democrats are better than that and should not stick with a decrepit and confused old man.

You’re ok with the entire Democratic primary being a joke? Ok with having your candidate selected for you in the proverbial cigar-filled room? Because once you go down that path it’s hard to go back to anything resembling democracy.

That's what happened in 2020 when Obama called other candidates and had them drop out, to stop Bernie.

No. Obama ran and won.

You are either stupid or still think everyone in America has amnesia.

Anonymous wrote:Apparently Harris has lunch with Biden every week. She didn't notice he eats his meat through a straw and talks to his salad about how he beat medicare?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would FAR rather lose to Trump having taken a risk to field a new candidate, than lose to Trump fielding Biden.

It's the difference between courage and cowardice. Right and wrong. The GOP is irredeemable with their Trump obsession, but the Democrats are better than that and should not stick with a decrepit and confused old man.

You’re ok with the entire Democratic primary being a joke? Ok with having your candidate selected for you in the proverbial cigar-filled room? Because once you go down that path it’s hard to go back to anything resembling democracy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will not be popular but we must face the truth that the debate was not just one bad night. He needs to step aside to save democracy. The leading Dems need to have a Road to Damascus meeting with the Bidens and that meeting needs to be immediately.

The Republic will not fail.

If Trump wins, the republic that we have known for almost 250 years, dies. It is that simple and it isn't hyperbole. He is telling you, the Heritage Foundation is telling and SCOTUS has told you exactly how it will be.

Tell ya what, you leave then and we'll stay.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will not be popular but we must face the truth that the debate was not just one bad night. He needs to step aside to save democracy. The leading Dems need to have a Road to Damascus meeting with the Bidens and that meeting needs to be immediately.

The Republic will not fail.

If Trump wins, the republic that we have known for almost 250 years, dies. It is that simple and it isn't hyperbole. He is telling you, the Heritage Foundation is telling and SCOTUS has told you exactly how it will be.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would FAR rather lose to Trump having taken a risk to field a new candidate, than lose to Trump fielding Biden.

It's the difference between courage and cowardice. Right and wrong. The GOP is irredeemable with their Trump obsession, but the Democrats are better than that and should not stick with a decrepit and confused old man.

Yeah, the Dems are such paragons of virtue with their hiding of POTUS’s clear incapacity and most undemocratic way of running the country by unelected administrative aids. I never want to hear a progressive again talk about preserving democracy after witnessing this $hit show.

Exaggerate much? Biden looked and sounded old not clearly incapacitated. Old but not take away his driver's license old.

He could live for years with the condition he has. It’s not about his age but it common in older people more often. It runs in families.

Sure, he could live for years, and be incapacitated for most of them.

Do you honestly think Biden is in any condition to take a call at 3 am with the news that China has launched an attack on Taiwan? I’m genuinely worried about that happening now given that it’s now transparently obvious there is no competent executive at the helm in the Oval Office. Are we supposed to be comfortable because Jill and Hunter Biden are supporting him at 3 a.m.?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.

She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.

Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.

Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.

Joe Biden was supposed to be a placeholder President, and then Kamala Harris was supposed to be the future of the party. We are just seeing the timeline moving up more quickly than expected.

Incredible because nobody in the Democrat Party wanted either. Elizabeth Warren was the choice in 2020 , but Biden , not the RNC or Trump, but the DNC ruined her campaign with Native American gate and Trump took the bait and started attacking her.

I don’t think anyone but Warren ruined her campaign. She is not popular with the business faction of the Democrats. The business faction of the Dems also grew with many business folks living the GOP because it isn’t the home of pro-business policy. Warren sunk her own ship. (I say this as someone who likes Warren. But also will note, if you don’t maintain a tribal identity w/ the tribe you claim then you have no business claiming heritage.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.

She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.

Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.

Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.

Joe Biden was supposed to be a placeholder President, and then Kamala Harris was supposed to be the future of the party. We are just seeing the timeline moving up more quickly than expected.

Incredible because nobody in the Democrat Party wanted either. Elizabeth Warren was the choice in 2020 , but Biden , not the RNC or Trump, but the DNC ruined her campaign with Native American gate and Trump took the bait and started attacking her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If the goal was Harris, Dems would be talking 25th amendment. The fact that they are not indicates they don't want that outcome.

You don't get it. Biden needs to be convinced, not forced. He's known to be stubborn, so it's going to take a lot of convincing. The 25th amendment would cause lasting resentment and damage. That's a MAGA dream, but not in Democrats' interest.

And Democrats are very fractured right now. Stop talking about "what Democrats want". A lot of them don't even know what they want, because they see grave risk whichever option they pick, which means that inertia and Biden might win the day. Thank goodness some people have had the courage to say publicly what many think privately - that Biden should step aside. I hope the dam has breached and Biden will be convinced to make a graceful exit. I'd say the chances are still in favor of a Trump/Biden election right now. Which would mean Trump as President given his debate momentum, the news from the judiciary and the polls. This time in 2020, Biden was statistically ahead.

Biden is not in the driver's seat. He was set up with the early debate and was too far gone mentally to see the trap. The Dems driving the move to replace him know what they want; a nominee that is not Biden, not Harris.

So who is in charge? You sound like you know. Is it the Masons or the Illuminati?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She would get absolutely destroyed by Trump in a debate.

Why?

Her past performances.

You are some RWNJ who knows nothing about her past performance other than what is served up to you on the trash you consider “news”.

Why are you coming after me simply because she gets stuck in word salads, has weird and inappropriate laughs and can’t follow trains of thoughts well? This is not about me, it’s about finding a Biden replacement.

She would be competing against Biden’s performance. Timing is everything.

Timing works against her not for her. She will need to spend her time rallying the various Democratic factions behind her, many of whom would prefer a Newsome or Whitmer, much less come after Trump.

Those factions are already voting against Trump. Worst case, a placeholder President is better than four more years of treasonous Trump continuing to sell us out to Saudi Arabia, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would FAR rather lose to Trump having taken a risk to field a new candidate, than lose to Trump fielding Biden.

It's the difference between courage and cowardice. Right and wrong. The GOP is irredeemable with their Trump obsession, but the Democrats are better than that and should not stick with a decrepit and confused old man.

Yeah, the Dems are such paragons of virtue with their hiding of POTUS’s clear incapacity and most undemocratic way of running the country by unelected administrative aids. I never want to hear a progressive again talk about preserving democracy after witnessing this $hit show.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her step daughter is a terrorist

Trump's SIL and daughter got 2b from Saudis.