Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
Lol imagine being so out of touch with reality that you think the arena was supported by the majority.
Imagine being so out of touch with reality that you think the folks who keep winning election after election are somehow unrepresentative of public opinion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
Lol imagine being so out of touch with reality that you think the arena was supported by the majority.
Imagine being so out of touch with reality that you think the folks who keep winning election after election are somehow unrepresentative of public opinion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're on the fence and you care about the moral compass of city leaders, here are the ones that don't believe in human rights or believe ordinary Palestinians are deserving of safety.
https://www.instagram.com/p/C6rWusKRYlr/?img_index=1
Voted AGAINST passing a ceasefire resolution (even if just a symbolic measure):
gaskins, jackson, mcpike, harris, o'connel, bagley, huskey.
When did the government of Alexandria, VA acquire authority over US foreign policy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're on the fence and you care about the moral compass of city leaders, here are the ones that don't believe in human rights or believe ordinary Palestinians are deserving of safety.
https://www.instagram.com/p/C6rWusKRYlr/?img_index=1
Voted AGAINST passing a ceasefire resolution (even if just a symbolic measure):
gaskins, jackson, mcpike, harris, o'connel, bagley, huskey.
When did the government of Alexandria, VA acquire authority over US foreign policy?
They didn't, but this is a very international city, and foreign policy issues personally affect many residents. I'm not saying a vote like this was necessary. But if one was held, I think it's gross that many council members voted in opposition.
This resolution has zero relevance to what local government is empowered to do for citizens. You prefer symbolism over substance.
Do you think the Confederate street names should be changed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
No, it’s pretty clear the ZFH and the arena were not widely supported. The issue is that not enough people vote in the primary and the primary is it in Alexandria.
Plus in this campaign cycle there is a lot of non-local money going towards certain candidates. These outside groups hired workers who cannot even pronounce candidates names. When name recognition is a huge factor in these elections, it can make a huge difference.
PP - I only voting for 1 mayoral candidate and 3 council candidates.
Any voter can vote in the open primary, so you have to assume if they don't vote, they don't see the performance of the current council as that big a "debacle". Among those who actually bother to cast a ballot, I expect the incumbents running for Council to be returned, and for Gaskins to win resoundingly.
Yes, they can vote but many people do not realize that is THE vote in Alexandria. November doesn’t matter and everyone basically stops campaigning after 6/18.
Gaskins will definitely win thanks to Peterson and the outside canvassers/money/name recognition, as will many of the incumbents. But I do not agree that provides those individuals with a mandate, or even an indication that their stances on more controversial issues are well supported. Rather, it’s a function of the primary process and influence of outside/developer money/ability to get your name out there.
I'll go with the results of elections as a strong indicator of the policies voters would like to see enacted, above "all my friends are furious about that duplex, how dare they"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
Lol imagine being so out of touch with reality that you think the arena was supported by the majority.
Imagine being so out of touch with reality that you think the folks who keep winning election after election are somehow unrepresentative of public opinion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
Lol imagine being so out of touch with reality that you think the arena was supported by the majority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
No, it’s pretty clear the ZFH and the arena were not widely supported. The issue is that not enough people vote in the primary and the primary is it in Alexandria.
Plus in this campaign cycle there is a lot of non-local money going towards certain candidates. These outside groups hired workers who cannot even pronounce candidates names. When name recognition is a huge factor in these elections, it can make a huge difference.
PP - I only voting for 1 mayoral candidate and 3 council candidates.
Any voter can vote in the open primary, so you have to assume if they don't vote, they don't see the performance of the current council as that big a "debacle". Among those who actually bother to cast a ballot, I expect the incumbents running for Council to be returned, and for Gaskins to win resoundingly.
Yes, they can vote but many people do not realize that is THE vote in Alexandria. November doesn’t matter and everyone basically stops campaigning after 6/18.
Gaskins will definitely win thanks to Peterson and the outside canvassers/money/name recognition, as will many of the incumbents. But I do not agree that provides those individuals with a mandate, or even an indication that their stances on more controversial issues are well supported. Rather, it’s a function of the primary process and influence of outside/developer money/ability to get your name out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
No, it’s pretty clear the ZFH and the arena were not widely supported. The issue is that not enough people vote in the primary and the primary is it in Alexandria.
Plus in this campaign cycle there is a lot of non-local money going towards certain candidates. These outside groups hired workers who cannot even pronounce candidates names. When name recognition is a huge factor in these elections, it can make a huge difference.
PP - I only voting for 1 mayoral candidate and 3 council candidates.
Any voter can vote in the open primary, so you have to assume if they don't vote, they don't see the performance of the current council as that big a "debacle". Among those who actually bother to cast a ballot, I expect the incumbents running for Council to be returned, and for Gaskins to win resoundingly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
No, it’s pretty clear the ZFH and the arena were not widely supported. The issue is that not enough people vote in the primary and the primary is it in Alexandria.
Plus in this campaign cycle there is a lot of non-local money going towards certain candidates. These outside groups hired workers who cannot even pronounce candidates names. When name recognition is a huge factor in these elections, it can make a huge difference.
PP - I only voting for 1 mayoral candidate and 3 council candidates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is anyone planning on not voting or voting for very few candidates? After the ZFH and arena debacles, I can’t believe there are still so many status quo candidates but here we are.
There are so many "status quo" candidates because most voters in Alexandria don't consider the arena proposal and especially ZFH to be "debacles". If you're prone to catastrophizing these issues, you're in the minority in this city, I'm afraid.
No, it’s pretty clear the ZFH and the arena were not widely supported. The issue is that not enough people vote in the primary and the primary is it in Alexandria.
Plus in this campaign cycle there is a lot of non-local money going towards certain candidates. These outside groups hired workers who cannot even pronounce candidates names. When name recognition is a huge factor in these elections, it can make a huge difference.
PP - I only voting for 1 mayoral candidate and 3 council candidates.