Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Which is all very well and good in principal.
But 18 percent white is ridiculous. 75 percent of the US is white.
Show me the numbers that Black and Hispanic students are doing so much better than the white students applying to places like Hopkins.
I'll wait.
I'm all for meritocracy. Academic achievement should be the metric. But this is just DEI racism.
Agree. And if they are adhering to the new SC ruling, there is absolutely no way the next incoming class can be only 18-19% white. It is racial discrimination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Which is all very well and good in principal.
But 18 percent white is ridiculous. 75 percent of the US is white.
Show me the numbers that Black and Hispanic students are doing so much better than the white students applying to places like Hopkins.
I'll wait.
I'm all for meritocracy. Academic achievement should be the metric. But this is just DEI racism.
Agree. And if they are adhering to the new SC ruling, there is absolutely no way the next incoming class can be only 18-19% white. It is racial discrimination.
Anonymous wrote:A white “Pablo Garcia” looks just as Hispanic as an indigenous “Pablo Garcia” on a job application. Are all hiring managers free of biases? Have we moved on from that? Will people still discriminate against both Pablos? Will they think they are both lazy, criminals, rapists? Do many Hispanics feel they have to be 200% better than the rest to taken seriously? Do they have to always be aware of stereotypes, and do the complete opposite, just to feel accepted in certain circles? Were they placed in regular track k-12 classes, because it was assumed they couldn’t handle the work load of honors/AP classes?
All this still happens, but from the outside, it is hard to see. You know, how some white people say they haven’t noticed any racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Which is all very well and good in principal.
But 18 percent white is ridiculous. 75 percent of the US is white.
Show me the numbers that Black and Hispanic students are doing so much better than the white students applying to places like Hopkins.
I'll wait.
I'm all for meritocracy. Academic achievement should be the metric. But this is just DEI racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Which is all very well and good in principal.
But 18 percent white is ridiculous. 75 percent of the US is white.
Show me the numbers that Black and Hispanic students are doing so much better than the white students applying to places like Hopkins.
I'll wait.
I'm all for meritocracy. Academic achievement should be the metric. But this is just DEI racism.
45% of Maryland is white, where JHU is located, not 75%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Forty percent of white kids were claiming URM status last year.
Source?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Which is all very well and good in principal.
But 18 percent white is ridiculous. 75 percent of the US is white.
Show me the numbers that Black and Hispanic students are doing so much better than the white students applying to places like Hopkins.
I'll wait.
I'm all for meritocracy. Academic achievement should be the metric. But this is just DEI racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Which is all very well and good in principal.
But 18 percent white is ridiculous. 75 percent of the US is white.
Show me the numbers that Black and Hispanic students are doing so much better than the white students applying to places like Hopkins.
I'll wait.
I'm all for meritocracy. Academic achievement should be the metric. But this is just DEI racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Which is all very well and good in principal.
But 18 percent white is ridiculous. 75 percent of the US is white.
Show me the numbers that Black and Hispanic students are doing so much better than the white students applying to places like Hopkins.
I'll wait.
I'm all for meritocracy. Academic achievement should be the metric. But this is just DEI racism.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
1000 percent. Compared to its peer schools, Hopkins is much more about academic achievement when it comes to admissions. Period.
So, sure there are a few recruited athletes etc etc. But, nothing like other schools. This may not work for every student, like those who want school spirit to be built around the football team, for instance. But it does make admission more straightforward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.
You have got to be kidding me. They have publicly stated they are anti-white and anti-legacy. That is not 'merit-based'. It is also discrimination. Their numbers reflect this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
How do you come to this conclusion? I get they don’t factor legacy, but assume they care about all the other holistic stuff.
They also absolutely recruit athletes.
They do recruit athletes and my child was going through it with them. The coaches made it very clear that the standards for admission are the standards for admission. They asked for grades and test scores almost right off the bat. And maybe there is some allowances for Hopkins athletes, it is not out experience and it most def is not a significant allowance. DC didn't go as JHU was not taking DC's position in DC's grad year so it didn't work out. But one of DC's teammates IS going there and that kid is beyond smart and I have no doubt meets the academic requirements.
Athletes are not taking anyone's kid's spot at Hopkins.
Ok, so you need good grades but only in regular classes. I’ve seen the kids who get recruited and the academic standards aren’t the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.
This.