Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would Jmu, Gmu, or VT be considered up an coming?
JMU and GMU yes.
Are they, though? They both seem kind of plateaued to me. I mean, they're both great options for what they are, but I don't see either currently evolving into a different-level place. Of the three, I'd say VT actually is the most likely "comer."
https://www.jmu.edu/news/2024/01/23-admitted-students.shtml
George Mason seems to be in more conversations lately but I don't have any numbers to back that up.
VT has been popular for a long time but I know there are plans for big future growth there in the next 20 years.
Anonymous wrote:Before starting to really learn about colleges as DC started High School I would have expected GMU to be mentioned as up and coming, given it's location and how dynamic some of their departments seem to be. But rarely do you hear anything to suggest that actually being the case. Academically, NOVA has nothing (or am I missing something, satellites don't count IMO).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My neighbor is staff at a popular, local, private uni.
They just had a “Come to Jesus” mtg about 20% of student body is failing to thrive. In others words, they can’t hack college. It seems to stem from TO admissions and how not everyone is cut out for college.
This seems suss. I teach at a uni with students who struggle. The problem is writing skills, not testing. Your post reads like cheap propaganda.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would Jmu, Gmu, or VT be considered up an coming?
JMU and GMU yes.
Are they, though? They both seem kind of plateaued to me. I mean, they're both great options for what they are, but I don't see either currently evolving into a different-level place. Of the three, I'd say VT actually is the most likely "comer."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Np
Aren’t there a number of schools between top 15 and Wooster or Lawrence? No experience with them at all just curious.
Okay, looking at LACs currently in the US News range of say 20-50, here are some that seem to be quietly rising even though they're still under the radar for some folks.
Macalester – Its focus on international studies and practical internships mixed with traditional liberal arts is becoming an appealing mix for more students, as well as its location in an actual city. (Occidental is a runner-up with similar qualities.)
Berea – Known for the radical idea of having all students participate in work-study and graduate without debt, its general repuation is steadily rising too, especially in sciences and literature. (Though the Kentucky locale won't appeal to all.)
Skidmore – Historically its strengths have been social sciences, humanities & arts, but in the past 20-ish years it's beefed up its STEM offerings, and has a large new state-of-the-art science building and even more faculty.
Whitman – A Pacific Northwest LAC that'd likely be more highly rated if it were in Connecticut or something, but it's increasingly catching the eyes of kids from the East Coast. (Even if Walla Walla is a journey to get to from other timezones.) Its off-campus "Semester in the West" program is pretty unique and multidisciplinary.
The issue with some in the 20-50 class is that they don't offer merit aid to students who don't have that stats that could get them into the T20 and doesn't have as much reputational difference with the tier below it. So anyone who doesn't want to pay full freight (or take on significant loans if they are determined to have financial need) goes down a tier. Since there's not a huge difference in real world reputation and not likely much difference in quality -- Wooster with a total cost of attendance of 35k/yr with merit aid beats Skidmore at 80k (rough numbers here, but that's the metric that strong MC/UMC kids interested in LACs but who can't easily afford them but don't qualify for much aid make). Berea doesn't really fall into that class--it has long served a very different population.
+1 My DD was mainly interested in LACs and we ran into this issue. We weren't willing to pay $70K+ for LACs in that 20-50 range. Some in the 40-50s could get as low as $50k with merit but that was still a stretch. DD visited schools she really liked in the 60-80 range that would cost more like $35k and there just didn't seem to be any real difference in student experience or name recognition for that difference in cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Np
Aren’t there a number of schools between top 15 and Wooster or Lawrence? No experience with them at all just curious.
Okay, looking at LACs currently in the US News range of say 20-50, here are some that seem to be quietly rising even though they're still under the radar for some folks.
Macalester – Its focus on international studies and practical internships mixed with traditional liberal arts is becoming an appealing mix for more students, as well as its location in an actual city. (Occidental is a runner-up with similar qualities.)
Berea – Known for the radical idea of having all students participate in work-study and graduate without debt, its general repuation is steadily rising too, especially in sciences and literature. (Though the Kentucky locale won't appeal to all.)
Skidmore – Historically its strengths have been social sciences, humanities & arts, but in the past 20-ish years it's beefed up its STEM offerings, and has a large new state-of-the-art science building and even more faculty.
Whitman – A Pacific Northwest LAC that'd likely be more highly rated if it were in Connecticut or something, but it's increasingly catching the eyes of kids from the East Coast. (Even if Walla Walla is a journey to get to from other timezones.) Its off-campus "Semester in the West" program is pretty unique and multidisciplinary.
The issue with some in the 20-50 class is that they don't offer merit aid to students who don't have that stats that could get them into the T20 and doesn't have as much reputational difference with the tier below it. So anyone who doesn't want to pay full freight (or take on significant loans if they are determined to have financial need) goes down a tier. Since there's not a huge difference in real world reputation and not likely much difference in quality -- Wooster with a total cost of attendance of 35k/yr with merit aid beats Skidmore at 80k (rough numbers here, but that's the metric that strong MC/UMC kids interested in LACs but who can't easily afford them but don't qualify for much aid make). Berea doesn't really fall into that class--it has long served a very different population.
Anonymous wrote:I expect that the top SLACs will continue to be more desirable in the mainstream as they get more attention. I personally think college rankings are overrated and overused beyond being a good grouping tool. There is no denying kids and parents care a lot about rankings now and having Amherst and Swarthmore ranked in the top 25 by both the WSJ and Forbes rankings that include universities and LACs helps their visibility (a few other schools are ranked in the top 25 of one or the other of those too). For better or worse, people who may not have seriously considered a SLAC will probably take a second look at them.