Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares about abortion. Non issue. I care more about attacking crime which the Democrats have utterly failed at across the board in this country.
I wouldn’t say abortion is a non-issue, but I agree that crime is an important issue. I would like for my county to continue to not be a crime-infested hellhole, so my vote for our local officials generally is going to the Rs. And quite frankly, I don’t think VA is a state that will ever have a 6 week abortion ban so abortion is lower on my voting priority list.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who cares about abortion. Non issue. I care more about attacking crime which the Democrats have utterly failed at across the board in this country.
It’s so interesting to me that Trump was the only president to preside over rising crime rates in 50 years and Democrats get the blame for it.
Anonymous wrote:Who cares about abortion. Non issue. I care more about attacking crime which the Democrats have utterly failed at across the board in this country.
Anonymous wrote:Who cares about abortion. Non issue. I care more about attacking crime which the Democrats have utterly failed at across the board in this country.
Anonymous wrote:Who cares about abortion. Non issue. I care more about attacking crime which the Democrats have utterly failed at across the board in this country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Women who vote blue simply due to abortion in a state where abortion has very reasonable timeframes, are very short sighted (I’m being kind)
**currently** has reasonable times
Clearly, the Rs are looking to ban as much as they can. There were already three bills this year that the D senate blocked.
Seems like you’re not following recent trends in Rs banning abortion.
You won’t give a crap about any of that if crime skyrockets. My guess is you are wealthy enough to be able
to avoid those realities.
+1. Crime is THE number one issue.
Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder as GOP try to run on a 15 week abortion ban, claiming its “reasonable,”
Youngkin has promised to sign whatever ban comes across his desk. That could be 15 wks or it could be 6 weeks.
No matter how much Youngkin puts a fleece vest on it, a ban, is a ban, is a ban.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder as GOP try to run on a 15 week abortion ban, claiming its “reasonable,”
Youngkin has promised to sign whatever ban comes across his desk. That could be 15 wks or it could be 6 weeks.
No matter how much Youngkin puts a fleece vest on it, a ban, is a ban, is a ban.
How many weeks is reasonable? 21?
Who are you asking? Because if it isn't the woman and her doctor, the definition of what someone thinks "reasonable" is is irrelevant. Pregnancy is literally the only medical condition that is the subject of this ridiculous level of legislation. Can you imagine if some right wing group decided that a cancerous tumor was "alive" and killing it was "murder" and spent years and years and billions of dollars of lobbying to try to convince people that it was?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder as GOP try to run on a 15 week abortion ban, claiming its “reasonable,”
Youngkin has promised to sign whatever ban comes across his desk. That could be 15 wks or it could be 6 weeks.
No matter how much Youngkin puts a fleece vest on it, a ban, is a ban, is a ban.
How many weeks is reasonable? 21?
Anonymous wrote:Just a reminder as GOP try to run on a 15 week abortion ban, claiming its “reasonable,”
Youngkin has promised to sign whatever ban comes across his desk. That could be 15 wks or it could be 6 weeks.
No matter how much Youngkin puts a fleece vest on it, a ban, is a ban, is a ban.