Anonymous wrote:Follow HouseInHabit. She uncovers it all, as always. Ex-girlfriend is bi-polar surfer/model looking for PR a year after they broke up and he has moved on. His texts are actually very encouraging and sane.

His texts are controlling, not someone with good sense would want to date but hervrejesding them
Makes her as emotionally immature he is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm Team Sarah here, fwiw, and am annoyed by the posters defending Hill when his status, wealth, and age outranked the surfer lady by a lot but his defenders are like "oh I would have been able to figure that out as a 25 year old." Sure.

I would have, though. I look back on my life experiences at 25 and I definitely would have been able to. If she wasn't able to, okay, but she was fully adult and it's not his fault she's a slow bloomer. He gave her a choice: abide my stringent requirements or move on. They moved on. So it seems like she was able to choose after all.

Exactly

I never thought he was much of an actor, let alone comedic talent. He is unattractive and his brand of comedy is very lowbrow. Yes, he's wealthy, gets invited to great events, and has A-list pals. Something about him attracted this young woman and the one he had a baby with. Lovable? Debatable, but there is supposedly someone for everyone. I find him very "leavable."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What do you dorks get paid to shill for this creep?

Why do you dorks get worked up about this? It’s so super weird, your level of outrage. Is it triggering for you or some shit like that?

Because he is a transparent manipulative and abusive creep preying on much younger women? And an actress came forward that he forced himself on her when he was 24 and she was 16? Longgggggg pattern of behavior from this sicko.

Anonymous wrote:I’m a nanny for celebs and truly shocked she didn’t have to sign an nda before their first date. We do NDA’s before a playdate!! He sounds totally insecure and controlling, kind of like most all other celebrities.

He's not that smart.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm Team Sarah here, fwiw, and am annoyed by the posters defending Hill when his status, wealth, and age outranked the surfer lady by a lot but his defenders are like "oh I would have been able to figure that out as a 25 year old." Sure.

Nobody is defending him. But her hands aren't clean here so why are you on "her team?" I'm on team "they both suck".

Yup. No winners here.

Anonymous wrote:I'm Team Sarah here, fwiw, and am annoyed by the posters defending Hill when his status, wealth, and age outranked the surfer lady by a lot but his defenders are like "oh I would have been able to figure that out as a 25 year old." Sure.

I would have, though. I look back on my life experiences at 25 and I definitely would have been able to. If she wasn't able to, okay, but she was fully adult and it's not his fault she's a slow bloomer. He gave her a choice: abide my stringent requirements or move on. They moved on. So it seems like she was able to choose after all.

Anonymous wrote:I'm Team Sarah here, fwiw, and am annoyed by the posters defending Hill when his status, wealth, and age outranked the surfer lady by a lot but his defenders are like "oh I would have been able to figure that out as a 25 year old." Sure.

Nobody is defending him. But her hands aren't clean here so why are you on "her team?" I'm on team "they both suck".

I'm Team Sarah here, fwiw, and am annoyed by the posters defending Hill when his status, wealth, and age outranked the surfer lady by a lot but his defenders are like "oh I would have been able to figure that out as a 25 year old." Sure.

Anonymous wrote:The real loser in this exchange is the reputation of therapy. Mental health care has been thankfully gaining steam as something important for overall health. But so much therapy seems like snake oil.

It's not snake oil, it's just that traditional therapy doesn't work for narcissists.

Anonymous wrote:What do you dorks get paid to shill for this creep?

Why do you dorks get worked up about this? It’s so super weird, your level of outrage. Is it triggering for you or some shit like that?

Anonymous wrote:Bro needs to step away from therapy. Who talks like that?

I found the Stutz documentary to be pretty boring, with only a few insightful ideas I had not heard before. Couples Therapy on Showtime, however, is terrific.

Anonymous wrote:What do you dorks get paid to shill for this creep?

This is DCUM, pp. I have been on this site for a decade and get paid absolutely nothing for my opinions. Periodically, I click on an ad to thank Jeff for running this every entertaining site. It is one of my hobbies to read and comment on posts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The only person I feel bad for is Hill's baby mama - gave birth to a kid 5 weeks ago, sleeping poorly, hormonal, likely still physically healing from the birth itself.

And then she needs to deal with all this drama. It's enough to drive a post-partum woman nuts.

The sick part is Sarah thought she was being helpful with the timing so that the new mom could make an informed decision. Yeah, right. What kind of person does this? She should be hoping for the best for them, for the sake of the new baby. It's just a very self-centered vindictive thing to do for her own benefit, not for anyone else's.

Exactly. No fan of Hill's but this has post-breakup revenge written all ovee it.

The real loser in this exchange is the reputation of therapy. Mental health care has been thankfully gaining steam as something important for overall health. But so much therapy seems like snake oil.