Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

See the post two above this one for an example.

DP. Sop engaging with the rabid Britney fan. She, like Britney, has her own 'truth isn't grounded in reality.

Not a single poster said a 'backhand' was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder. Instead, a lot of people questioned the veracity of Britney's claim.

But there's a video of him smacking her and we saw it. What's your alternative explanation? Are you disputing that she was slapped, or are you saying that given the totality of circumstances (she tapped him while acting weird) that slapping her was justified?

Some of us, including the police, watched the video and didn't see him slapping her. We saw her trying to touch someone, and the bodyguard pushing/smacking her hand away.

Her face turned and her glasses fell off. And, the security guy apologized for slapping her. That seems to point to Britney being slapped.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

See the post two above this one for an example.

DP. Sop engaging with the rabid Britney fan. She, like Britney, has her own 'truth isn't grounded in reality.

Not a single poster said a 'backhand' was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder. Instead, a lot of people questioned the veracity of Britney's claim.

But there's a video of him smacking her and we saw it. What's your alternative explanation? Are you disputing that she was slapped, or are you saying that given the totality of circumstances (she tapped him while acting weird) that slapping her was justified?

Some of us, including the police, watched the video and didn't see him slapping her. We saw her trying to touch someone, and the bodyguard pushing/smacking her hand away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

See the post two above this one for an example.

DP. Sop engaging with the rabid Britney fan. She, like Britney, has her own 'truth isn't grounded in reality.

Not a single poster said a 'backhand' was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder. Instead, a lot of people questioned the veracity of Britney's claim.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

See the post two above this one for an example.

DP. Sop engaging with the rabid Britney fan. She, like Britney, has her own 'truth isn't grounded in reality.

Not a single poster said a 'backhand' was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder. Instead, a lot of people questioned the veracity of Britney's claim.

Anonymous wrote:She can’t get near his shoulder without stilts so her version of events doesn’t really make sense.

With all due respect, she’s not the Britney of early 2000. This kid was minding his business, walking to get a bite to eat, and an over zealous fan decides they have a right to grab his body? His security did their job. They owe her nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

See the post two above this one for an example.

DP. Sop engaging with the rabid Britney fan. She, like Britney, has her own 'truth isn't grounded in reality.

Not a single poster said a 'backhand' was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder. Instead, a lot of people questioned the veracity of Britney's claim.

But there's a video of him smacking her and we saw it. What's your alternative explanation? Are you disputing that she was slapped, or are you saying that given the totality of circumstances (she tapped him while acting weird) that slapping her was justified?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I was one of the folks who posted repeatedly that there was more to the conservatorship than the Free Britney folks were grasping. Since she won her freedom her life has been melting down as predicted.

I hope this is as bad as it gets, but sadly I don’t think she has anyone really looking out for her best interests and she is clearly treatment resistant when fully in charge of her own life.

Mental illness is so scary, sad, and persistent, even with meds. Doesn't ever really go away.

Neither of you know anything. However, containing someone against their will causes harm. Whatever you think you see, you don’t. People should have agency to post whatever they want in social media, to burn piles of cash. How is the post not funny? Anyone else who posted it would get a laugh and a “yeah, mood today.” But, you all have to pathologize Britney even though she’s never announced she has a mental illness.

One more thread saying men can use violence, and if women doth protest they’re crazy.

She does not need to announce anything. Her mental health issues have been painfully obvious for years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

See the post two above this one for an example.

DP. Sop engaging with the rabid Britney fan. She, like Britney, has her own 'truth isn't grounded in reality.

Not a single poster said a 'backhand' was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder. Instead, a lot of people questioned the veracity of Britney's claim.

Anonymous wrote:

This hasn’t aged a day

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

See the post two above this one for an example.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

You mean the people who — correctly, it turned out — said wait until an investigation is done before jumping to conclusions? Those who condemned the security guard because they took the rich famous white lady’s word that the security guard hit her in the face (“backhanded”) were wrong, and are trying to find a way to justify their “outrage,” however, misplaced it may be.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.

How? Explain it to me in the context of the entire back and forth? Like where I said I wasn’t responding to what actually happened, but the fact that before some posters even knew what happened, they thought a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on a shoulder.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At this point m, he should press charges as well.

For a tap on the shoulder or back? Are you insane?

Have you crazies never tapped a stranger in public to get their attention? If they, or anyone associated with them responded by backhanding you, you would think that is a completely inappropriate response. Hell I tapped some in the store last night because they were on their phone and being called up to check out. Should I get a backhand?

I don’t care who anyone involved in this situation is, if you think the response to a tap on the shoulder or back is a backhand to the other person, you are insane.

PP here - I also just want to point out that some of these crazies were defending the body guard before they saw the video. Meaning they did think a backhand was an appropriate response to a tap on the shoulder.

What happened in the video and the responses to that should be separate from the absolute insane response that a backhand is an appropriate reaction to a tap on the shoulder, which is the scenario these posters were responding to. I know it’s probably the same convoluted reasoning an incel uses to beat a partner or kid but still, it’s insane to read these defenses.

So much projection here. There was no “backhand.” The police say the security footage shows that the body guard pushed her hand away, and her own hand struck her face.

I’m an older white lady, and not one to see racism behind every response, but I can’t believe how many people here immediately took the word of a woman who is so mentally unstable that she was subject to a conservatorship until very recently. The people who were “Team Britney!” before the investigation was conducted are the ones who need to do a lot of personal introspection.

Your reading comprehension is terrible. You are the one projecting and reading something into a post that doesn’t exist.

NP. You’re the one that’s wrong. The PP with whom you’re responding makes perfect sense.