Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s easy to forget this in the DCUM bubble, but many families don’t have the option to leave. And those kids deserve an education.
Maybe not in pre-K, but by kindergarten there are seats at many better schools without these issues, just not at HRCSs with a DCI preference…
You are assuming that all families have resources to get their kids to those other schools, among other assumptions.
Please do describe a person who can get their child to Mundo P St but not to Seaton or Langley.
Oh please. Your privilege is showing.
Okay. Oodles of people are so disadvantaged that they literally can't travel even a few more blocks. Tons of them.
Not everyone speaks English. Not everyone wants to leave a school where they’ll be treated like a second class citizen.
Dc generally treats Latinos like garbage. As a Latino person I frankly don’t feel comfortable sending my kids to a dcps school.
Your privilege is showing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s easy to forget this in the DCUM bubble, but many families don’t have the option to leave. And those kids deserve an education.
Maybe not in pre-K, but by kindergarten there are seats at many better schools without these issues, just not at HRCSs with a DCI preference…
You are assuming that all families have resources to get their kids to those other schools, among other assumptions.
Please do describe a person who can get their child to Mundo P St but not to Seaton or Langley.
Oh please. Your privilege is showing.
Okay. Oodles of people are so disadvantaged that they literally can't travel even a few more blocks. Tons of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+100. Agree. It is really not as simple as just 'pulling' our kids from school and placing them elsewhere. A lot of families want and need Mundo to succeed, and the start of a solution seems to be a change in executive leadership.
Absent the board taking action to remove her from that position (or her resignation), is there any other way to get new leadership?
I understand protests are occurring, people are contacting the school board, newspapers, etc., but ultimately, it is the board's call, right?
Honestly...this might sound crass, but it's not worth the risk. There's a real risk it WON'T succeed for your kid. If you have the means, get out now. We stayed far too long at another charter that has completely cratered (talked about frequently on DCUM) thinking we could work with other parents to effect change. My child suffered. And years later, we are still trying to gain ground. Even if there is a change in leadership, it sounds like there's a lot of rot at MV that might work itself out, but it will be YEARS from now and your child will not feel the benefit.
Did that school sound like "Moo Livers"?
Lol. Indeed it did. A cautionary tale; the inept ED is gone, but the downward spiral continues.
+1000 to the cautionary tale and downward spiral of “Moo Livers”
May this neologism join Larla, Larlo, Larlat, Bobcat Girl, "HRCS", and other Highly Regarded DCUM Terms in the DCUM Hall of Fame.
What’s Bobcat Girl?!?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+100. Agree. It is really not as simple as just 'pulling' our kids from school and placing them elsewhere. A lot of families want and need Mundo to succeed, and the start of a solution seems to be a change in executive leadership.
Absent the board taking action to remove her from that position (or her resignation), is there any other way to get new leadership?
I understand protests are occurring, people are contacting the school board, newspapers, etc., but ultimately, it is the board's call, right?
Honestly...this might sound crass, but it's not worth the risk. There's a real risk it WON'T succeed for your kid. If you have the means, get out now. We stayed far too long at another charter that has completely cratered (talked about frequently on DCUM) thinking we could work with other parents to effect change. My child suffered. And years later, we are still trying to gain ground. Even if there is a change in leadership, it sounds like there's a lot of rot at MV that might work itself out, but it will be YEARS from now and your child will not feel the benefit.
Did that school sound like "Moo Livers"?
Lol. Indeed it did. A cautionary tale; the inept ED is gone, but the downward spiral continues.
+1000 to the cautionary tale and downward spiral of “Moo Livers”
May this neologism join Larla, Larlo, Larlat, Bobcat Girl, "HRCS", and other Highly Regarded DCUM Terms in the DCUM Hall of Fame.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+100. Agree. It is really not as simple as just 'pulling' our kids from school and placing them elsewhere. A lot of families want and need Mundo to succeed, and the start of a solution seems to be a change in executive leadership.
Absent the board taking action to remove her from that position (or her resignation), is there any other way to get new leadership?
I understand protests are occurring, people are contacting the school board, newspapers, etc., but ultimately, it is the board's call, right?
Honestly...this might sound crass, but it's not worth the risk. There's a real risk it WON'T succeed for your kid. If you have the means, get out now. We stayed far too long at another charter that has completely cratered (talked about frequently on DCUM) thinking we could work with other parents to effect change. My child suffered. And years later, we are still trying to gain ground. Even if there is a change in leadership, it sounds like there's a lot of rot at MV that might work itself out, but it will be YEARS from now and your child will not feel the benefit.
Did that school sound like "Moo Livers"?
Lol. Indeed it did. A cautionary tale; the inept ED is gone, but the downward spiral continues.
+1000 to the cautionary tale and downward spiral of “Moo Livers”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+100. Agree. It is really not as simple as just 'pulling' our kids from school and placing them elsewhere. A lot of families want and need Mundo to succeed, and the start of a solution seems to be a change in executive leadership.
Absent the board taking action to remove her from that position (or her resignation), is there any other way to get new leadership?
I understand protests are occurring, people are contacting the school board, newspapers, etc., but ultimately, it is the board's call, right?
Honestly...this might sound crass, but it's not worth the risk. There's a real risk it WON'T succeed for your kid. If you have the means, get out now. We stayed far too long at another charter that has completely cratered (talked about frequently on DCUM) thinking we could work with other parents to effect change. My child suffered. And years later, we are still trying to gain ground. Even if there is a change in leadership, it sounds like there's a lot of rot at MV that might work itself out, but it will be YEARS from now and your child will not feel the benefit.
Did that school sound like "Moo Livers"?
Lol. Indeed it did. A cautionary tale; the inept ED is gone, but the downward spiral continues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I believe the first non-guaranteed class is current 3rd graders? So we should know soon!
Well THAT's ironic, no?
Anonymous wrote:Well, I believe the first non-guaranteed class is current 3rd graders? So we should know soon!
Anonymous wrote:I think people are feeling that functionally, they *do* have a DCI guarantee because so many other students have left and MV hasn't been able to reach its target class sizes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are many things I love about Mundo Verde and teachers and staff we have loved, too. Some jumped ship, some are still there and I'm so thankful that they are. There still are truly amazing human beings going to work there every day.
I just can't help but wonder how things could have been different if the charter board listened to the many parents testifying the school was not ready to expand to two campuses. I think the intentions were good but there were enough red flags that should have alarmed the MV board and the PCSB. Both boards are responsible. Are they learning anything from this mess?
So much done in the name of equity has backfired and left vulnerable kids more vulnerable.
How was the expansion approval "in the name of equity"? Were there promises to serve more at-risk students at the new campus or something else?