Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I’m black with great credit. Will this screw me over? Even though it says this is somehow helping racial disparities?
Yes, a black person with good credit will pay more for a mortgage than a back person with poor credit.
Anyone with good credit, black, brown, or white will pay more for a mortgage than a person with poor credit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I’m black with great credit. Will this screw me over? Even though it says this is somehow helping racial disparities?
Yes, a black person with good credit will pay more for a mortgage than a back person with poor credit.
Anyone with good credit, black, brown, or white will pay more for a mortgage than a person with poor credit.
Anonymous wrote:
I’m black with great credit. Will this screw me over? Even though it says this is somehow helping racial disparities?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is completely and utterly insane.
+1000 This is ridiculous and infuriating!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lifelong democrat voter here. This is idiotic, terrible policy, and anti-American. I feel like we live in an Idiocracy.
Can you point to the specific aspect of the policy that you find anti-American?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After all the outrage about this, no one wanted to give an update? This got rescinded, right?
https://www.fhfa.gov/Media/PublicAffairs/Pages/FHFA-Announces-Rescission-of-Enterprise-Upfront-Fees-Based-on-Debt-To-Income-Ratio.aspx
wow. how embarassing for FHFA.
How embarrassing that you don't even realize this was just one element of their proposed fee changes. They are getting rid of DTI as a factor in the fee matrix. The proposal would've charged a 0.375% fee if the borrower had greater than a 40% DTI. It was supposed to be charged in order to strengthen the safety and soundness of Fannie Mae. But that is being rescinded. Instead, Fannie will continue to give a break to over-leveraged people (including lots of rich people who like to use lots of debt).
Here's a plain English reading if you can't handle Fannie press releases and FR notices: https://www.ocregister.com/2023/05/10/fhfa-rescinds-controversial-debt-to-ratio-fee-change-for-home-loans/
This is completely separate from the ginned up controversy about marginally lower fees for people with lower credit scores. That is still moving ahead.
Imagine being so dumb and not understanding what you're sharing on the Internet.
FHFA is a hack agency. They already are walking back the LLPA credit scores adjustment, and now this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After all the outrage about this, no one wanted to give an update? This got rescinded, right?
https://www.fhfa.gov/Media/PublicAffairs/Pages/FHFA-Announces-Rescission-of-Enterprise-Upfront-Fees-Based-on-Debt-To-Income-Ratio.aspx
wow. how embarassing for FHFA.
How embarrassing that you don't even realize this was just one element of their proposed fee changes. They are getting rid of DTI as a factor in the fee matrix. The proposal would've charged a 0.375% fee if the borrower had greater than a 40% DTI. It was supposed to be charged in order to strengthen the safety and soundness of Fannie Mae. But that is being rescinded. Instead, Fannie will continue to give a break to over-leveraged people (including lots of rich people who like to use lots of debt).
Here's a plain English reading if you can't handle Fannie press releases and FR notices: https://www.ocregister.com/2023/05/10/fhfa-rescinds-controversial-debt-to-ratio-fee-change-for-home-loans/
This is completely separate from the ginned up controversy about marginally lower fees for people with lower credit scores. That is still moving ahead.
Imagine being so dumb and not understanding what you're sharing on the Internet.