Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?
Yes, of course school performance matters.
Another way to say this is: "I don't want my children to be in school with children from low-income families." Which is fine as a personal preference, I guess. But it's not the basis for sound public policy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?
Yes, of course school performance matters.
Another way to say this is: "I don't want my children to be in school with children from low-income families." Which is fine as a personal preference, I guess. But it's not the basis for sound public policy.
We all vote with our interests’ in mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“disadvantages” of living in the suburbs? When in reality, they’re precisely the reasons that people CHOOSE to live in the suburbs? I for one, LIKE that my neighborhood has streets you can’t drive through, lacks sidewalks, lacks public transit, has big yards and is mostly houses with few commercial establishments. I don’t want to be able to walk to a bar or 7-eleven, and I don’t want anyone walking from those places to walk through my neighborhood.
Because they feel that the preference for the suburbs is objectively wrong, and vociferously making the case will make them feel justified in their increasingly aggressive efforts to impose their own preferences on people.
Anonymous wrote:“disadvantages” of living in the suburbs? When in reality, they’re precisely the reasons that people CHOOSE to live in the suburbs? I for one, LIKE that my neighborhood has streets you can’t drive through, lacks sidewalks, lacks public transit, has big yards and is mostly houses with few commercial establishments. I don’t want to be able to walk to a bar or 7-eleven, and I don’t want anyone walking from those places to walk through my neighborhood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If apartments are so amazing, why aren’t the neighborhoods filled with apartments the most expensive?
Have you seen the demographics of New York City? Of the Connecticut Avenue Corridor? Of the new Navy Yard or Wharf? Of Dupont Circle? The density in Singapore? Tokyo? London? I mean, these are among the wealthiest neighborhoods in the world.
Can we enforce laws like Singapore? Thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?
Yes, of course school performance matters.
Another way to say this is: "I don't want my children to be in school with children from low-income families." Which is fine as a personal preference, I guess. But it's not the basis for sound public policy.
We all vote with our interests’ in mind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If apartments are so amazing, why aren’t the neighborhoods filled with apartments the most expensive?
Have you seen the demographics of New York City? Of the Connecticut Avenue Corridor? Of the new Navy Yard or Wharf? Of Dupont Circle? The density in Singapore? Tokyo? London? I mean, these are among the wealthiest neighborhoods in the world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?
Yes, of course school performance matters.
Another way to say this is: "I don't want my children to be in school with children from low-income families." Which is fine as a personal preference, I guess. But it's not the basis for sound public policy.
I do not want my children to be in school with children from low-income families.
Anonymous wrote:If apartments are so amazing, why aren’t the neighborhoods filled with apartments the most expensive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?
Yes, of course school performance matters.
Another way to say this is: "I don't want my children to be in school with children from low-income families." Which is fine as a personal preference, I guess. But it's not the basis for sound public policy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?
Yes, of course school performance matters.
Another way to say this is: "I don't want my children to be in school with children from low-income families." Which is fine as a personal preference, I guess. But it's not the basis for sound public policy.
Anonymous wrote:If apartments are so amazing, why aren’t the neighborhoods filled with apartments the most expensive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?
Yes, of course school performance matters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Show me a “YIMBY” neighborhood with high-performing by-right schools.
We should base our land use and housing policies on standardized test scores in schools?