Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

He’s like a low-rent Snowden. Except he wasn’t making that big contractor money.

What’s shocking is that flags were not auto-triggered when an IT tech in the national guard was accessing & printing these files. The content in these documents have nothing to do with his job. And why do SCIFs have printers?!? That’s gotta go too.

No. Snowden was a whistleblower. This guy is a cult leader. Very different aspirations and ethics.

Snowden was not a whistleblower. Whisitleblowers do not work with enemies of the state like Assange and then end up under the protectorate of Moscow.

You can dislike him and disagree with him and what he did as much as you want but that doesn't change what he was doing, which was whistleblowing.

This guy? Not whistleblowing.

Would be very interested to know more about this guy’s background! Such an odd thing.

Notice how quickly the FBI was on this, as compared to all of the allowances for Trump, who has been sharing stolen secrets with our enemies?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

He’s like a low-rent Snowden. Except he wasn’t making that big contractor money.

What’s shocking is that flags were not auto-triggered when an IT tech in the national guard was accessing & printing these files. The content in these documents have nothing to do with his job. And why do SCIFs have printers?!? That’s gotta go too.

No. Snowden was a whistleblower. This guy is a cult leader. Very different aspirations and ethics.

Snowden was not a whistleblower. Whisitleblowers do not work with enemies of the state like Assange and then end up under the protectorate of Moscow.

Anonymous wrote:Well, this young kid FAAFO and likely ruined the next 45-65 years of his life.

I hope he serves a nice long sentence if he is indeed guilty.

But, let's remember what he and others in the US have seen.....
Chelsea Manning was convicted of 17 charges, sentenced to 35 years, and the sentence was commuted by Obama after 7 years.
Until we start cracking down on serious breaches like this, they will continue to occur.
Wannabe leakers are going to continue to leak if they think they won't be severely punished.

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

Anonymous wrote:The FBI has announced that they have made an arrest.

But before the arrest, as they were searching the house, a news helicopter saw him getting some sun on the deck, reading a book.

I am just appalled that a random 20yr old idiot kid can have access to top secret docs that are on a rescricted list, and just print them and take them out. at this point, I am just amazed that our secrets are not spilled more often. between the secret docs found at the homes of Trump, Biden and Pence (and at least for the latter two it seems reasonable to believe that they were taken by mistake and nobody noticed) and this, I hope somebody starts looking a little more seriously who has access to what and how to keep track of things

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the times

Later, someone who appeared to be Airman Teixeira drove onto the property in a red pickup truck.

When Times reporters approached the house again, the truck was parked in the driveway. Airman Teixeira’s mother and a man were standing outside in the driveway.

When asked if Airman Teixeira was there and willing to speak, the man said: “He needs to get an attorney if things are flowing the way they are going right now. The Feds will be around soon, I’m sure.”

The NYT found this guy before the feds did? Wonder if FBI agents refused to investigate the case?

And what does that tell you instinctively?

I'm hoping that the FBI hadn't moved on the guy yet because they'd had him under surveillance???? They aren't really as incompetent as this NYT story make them appear, right??? Right???

I just watched the Boston Bombing doc on Netflix. The FBI had images of the suspects fairly quickly and were determining the identity when someone leaked the images. I got the sense it was BPD, but idk. Anyways, the reason the FBI and DOJ didn't want to release them was b/c they didn't want to alert the bombers that they were on to them. Ultimately, FBI had to get out ahead of the leak, and then there was a lot of death and destruction that followed when they tried to escape. Not to mention the bombers' friends trying to destroy evidence once they recognized who it was.

The FBI has announced that they have made an arrest.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

He’s like a low-rent Snowden. Except he wasn’t making that big contractor money.

What’s shocking is that flags were not auto-triggered when an IT tech in the national guard was accessing & printing these files. The content in these documents have nothing to do with his job. And why do SCIFs have printers?!? That’s gotta go too.

No. Snowden was a whistleblower. This guy is a cult leader. Very different aspirations and ethics.

We don’t really know what his motives were yet. But he appears to have used cult leader tactics to operationalize a group of kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

He’s like a low-rent Snowden. Except he wasn’t making that big contractor money.

What’s shocking is that flags were not auto-triggered when an IT tech in the national guard was accessing & printing these files. The content in these documents have nothing to do with his job. And why do SCIFs have printers?!? That’s gotta go too.

No. Snowden was a whistleblower. This guy is a cult leader. Very different aspirations and ethics.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per the NYTs, these documents would’ve only been viewable in a SCIF. And phones & cameras are banned from SCIFs.

So how did a camera get inside a SCIF?

My money is that this leak is from someone inside Congress

Oh, FFS. Someone in Congress did not leak this.

Perhaps if leaks had been taken more seriously in the past, this crap would not be happening.

People have been leaking stuff for a while now, and very rarely suffer any ramifications.

Republican congressmen showed during the first impeachment that they have no respect for SCIFs.

Exactly. And everyone I know who works in SCIFs is under strict rules about phones and cameras.

I will snicker a little when we find that this leak was from some far-left Democrat trying to impress his friends.

❌❌❌
He’s a “young, charismatic gun enthusiast.”

+1

Washington Post reporters got hold of members of the Discord channel where the leaks were posted, they know the poster, and said he is in his 20s, currently serving in the military, conservative, gun enthusiast, and he got the documents from a military base that he serves on. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/04/12/discord-leaked-documents/

Will probably get caught very soon.

Where in the posted article did they say he was "conservative?" Or, serving in the military? Citation needed.

Literally the first lines of the linked article. Jesus.

Copy and paste them here.

Here's a gift link to the article - https://wapo.st/400q5B6

The teen who gave the interview in the article is in a world of hurt. I hope he gets a lawyer.

Copy and past the part where pp here claimed he is "conservative" and "serving in the military."

DP here
“But OG had a dark view of the government. The young member said he spoke of the United States, and particularly law enforcement and the intelligence community, as a sinister force that sought to suppress its citizens and keep them in the dark. He ranted about “government overreach.”

Sure sounds like a liberal to me!! Nothing specific about being actual military but he clearly was a gun nutter conservative that worked at a secure military location.

"Gun-nutters" are not just conservatives.
The Kentucky killer pretty much put that idea to rest.

Is it conservatives or liberals who are anti government overreach and into chatting about guns and god? Don’t play dumb, we’re all smart people here.

As a pp said, sounds much more like a libertarian.

He could well be conservative. But, the poster above that was citing the WaPo article made some huge assumptions and stated false claims saying it was in the article.
If you are going to post information, be accurate. Because we can all read. I can only think she assumed people wouldn't actually check her information.

Agree. It bugs the heck out of me when posters just generalize, conflate and make assumptions. I have no problem if this guy turns out to be a Q/MAGA conspiracy theorist of the worst type, but this is NOT what was reported. Be accurate, people! This is how you start tons of disinformation online. We already have too much of that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the times

Later, someone who appeared to be Airman Teixeira drove onto the property in a red pickup truck.

When Times reporters approached the house again, the truck was parked in the driveway. Airman Teixeira’s mother and a man were standing outside in the driveway.

When asked if Airman Teixeira was there and willing to speak, the man said: “He needs to get an attorney if things are flowing the way they are going right now. The Feds will be around soon, I’m sure.”

The NYT found this guy before the feds did? Wonder if FBI agents refused to investigate the case?

And what does that tell you instinctively?

I'm hoping that the FBI hadn't moved on the guy yet because they'd had him under surveillance???? They aren't really as incompetent as this NYT story make them appear, right??? Right???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The WaPo is reporting that Jack Teixeira is an IT tech, which would explain how he had access to the docs.

He’s like a low-rent Snowden. Except he wasn’t making that big contractor money.

What’s shocking is that flags were not auto-triggered when an IT tech in the national guard was accessing & printing these files. The content in these documents have nothing to do with his job. And why do SCIFs have printers?!? That’s gotta go too.

He was assigned to the Intel Wing.