Anonymous wrote:Has there been any mention of punishment for the parents beyond the anemic statement I read about how they're looking into it?
I realize a 6 y.o. can't be tried but something really needs to be done with the kid. He is dangerous. I do not care what anyone says.
Is it true that the teacher was threatened by the student & the school looked the other way? Time to sue the school system.
Anonymous wrote:
The kids are full of rage - younger and younger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has there been any mention of punishment for the parents beyond the anemic statement I read about how they're looking into it?
I realize a 6 y.o. can't be tried but something really needs to be done with the kid. He is dangerous. I do not care what anyone says.
Is it true that the teacher was threatened by the student & the school looked the other way? Time to sue the school system.
Kids say things, even 6 year olds. Treating a threat from a 6 year old the same as a threat from a high school or middle school student is not the solution.
Do you have kids?
Yes, 6 year olds sometimes say things that can be terrifying. No, you don't treat a threat from a 6 year old the same as you would a 16 year old. At the same time, you don't ignore what 6 year olds say. You take them seriously. Kids of any age who threaten a teacher or bring in bullets need a psych eval, a behavior plan, a full time 1:1 aide and their backpacks searched daily. Kids who bring bullets to school have zero place in a gen ed setting. There are therapeutic schools where kids have to pass through metal detectors. Yes, even 5 and 6 year olds have to pass through metal detectors. For good reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has there been any mention of punishment for the parents beyond the anemic statement I read about how they're looking into it?
I realize a 6 y.o. can't be tried but something really needs to be done with the kid. He is dangerous. I do not care what anyone says.
Is it true that the teacher was threatened by the student & the school looked the other way? Time to sue the school system.
Kids say things, even 6 year olds. Treating a threat from a 6 year old the same as a threat from a high school or middle school student is not the solution.
Do you have kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has there been any mention of punishment for the parents beyond the anemic statement I read about how they're looking into it?
I realize a 6 y.o. can't be tried but something really needs to be done with the kid. He is dangerous. I do not care what anyone says.
Is it true that the teacher was threatened by the student & the school looked the other way? Time to sue the school system.
Kids say things, even 6 year olds. Treating a threat from a 6 year old the same as a threat from a high school or middle school student is not the solution.
Do you have kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has there been any mention of punishment for the parents beyond the anemic statement I read about how they're looking into it?
I realize a 6 y.o. can't be tried but something really needs to be done with the kid. He is dangerous. I do not care what anyone says.
Is it true that the teacher was threatened by the student & the school looked the other way? Time to sue the school system.
Kids say things, even 6 year olds. Treating a threat from a 6 year old the same as a threat from a high school or middle school student is not the solution.
Do you have kids?
Anonymous wrote:Has there been any mention of punishment for the parents beyond the anemic statement I read about how they're looking into it?
I realize a 6 y.o. can't be tried but something really needs to be done with the kid. He is dangerous. I do not care what anyone says.
Is it true that the teacher was threatened by the student & the school looked the other way? Time to sue the school system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The parents should be prosecuted.
And most importantly, when are we as a society going to believe the right to live is more important than gun rights?!
If Sandy Hook didn’t spur a rethinking of guns in this country, nothing will.
Your pessimism is nihilistic and useless.
Yes, parents are now being charged. In Michigan, the parents were charged. Here, this seems a clear case to charge the parent.
Ok, that still doesn’t change anything. Do you think a wounded teacher will move the needle when classrooms full of dead kids didn’t?
Sadly, no. I’m sure the right wing talking point will be using this as an example of why teachers should be armed in the classroom.
So she could, what, shoot a 6 year old?![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:that’s not even remotely true. The vast majority of school shootings don’t get covered by the msm. They are the types democrats ignore . Though it wasn’t a school shooting , 3 killed in a mass shooting in Philly last night. Only local coverage.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and whet it turns out the family are felons and not legal gun owners?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The parents should be prosecuted.
And most importantly, when are we as a society going to believe the right to live is more important than gun rights?!
2A 4ever!
MAGA
/s
Well well well…how the turntables.
The child got the gun from his mother, who was a legal gun owner.
Now what? No straw man for you to attack this time!
DP.. most school shootings are committed by people who had access to guns that were purchased legally.
Like I said to MAGAs, it's 2A 4eva.
? this has nothing to do with msm news coverage.
Can you prove that the vast majority of those shootings apparently not covered by msm were committed with illegally purchased guns?
They probably can because the definition of school shooting is so broad that a gang related shooting at 2:00 am on a Saturday outside of a school qualifies
Anonymous wrote:She's a hero, and I really hope this doesn't drive her and her fellow teachers out of teaching. I'm rather amazed that she survived a close range shot in the abdomen. Was there a report of what kind of gun?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:that’s not even remotely true. The vast majority of school shootings don’t get covered by the msm. They are the types democrats ignore . Though it wasn’t a school shooting , 3 killed in a mass shooting in Philly last night. Only local coverage.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and whet it turns out the family are felons and not legal gun owners?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The parents should be prosecuted.
And most importantly, when are we as a society going to believe the right to live is more important than gun rights?!
2A 4ever!
MAGA
/s
Well well well…how the turntables.
The child got the gun from his mother, who was a legal gun owner.
Now what? No straw man for you to attack this time!
DP.. most school shootings are committed by people who had access to guns that were purchased legally.
Like I said to MAGAs, it's 2A 4eva.
? this has nothing to do with msm news coverage.
Can you prove that the vast majority of those shootings apparently not covered by msm were committed with illegally purchased guns?
Anonymous wrote:that’s not even remotely true. The vast majority of school shootings don’t get covered by the msm. They are the types democrats ignore . Though it wasn’t a school shooting , 3 killed in a mass shooting in Philly last night. Only local coverage.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:and whet it turns out the family are felons and not legal gun owners?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The parents should be prosecuted.
And most importantly, when are we as a society going to believe the right to live is more important than gun rights?!
2A 4ever!
MAGA
/s
Well well well…how the turntables.
The child got the gun from his mother, who was a legal gun owner.
Now what? No straw man for you to attack this time!
DP.. most school shootings are committed by people who had access to guns that were purchased legally.
Like I said to MAGAs, it's 2A 4eva.