Anonymous
Post 10/25/2022 10:15     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Can someone summarize
Anonymous
Post 10/24/2022 16:25     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anyone listen? Sarah is so annoying making everything about herself.
Anonymous
Post 10/22/2022 15:08     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:They are now doing a five part series.

This is starting to be a bit much...I guess Sarah gets a lot of listens with this particular topic, but seems odd to center your podcast on your former bosses' ex wife if you're trying to build your own career.

I agree.
They are milking this, but I have a feeling they have nothing else to talk about. Nobody was listening to Sarah’s podcast before this. The woman barely speaks in complete sentences and Natasha is pulling the “suicide” card now. It sounds disingenuous, but it whatever pulls in listeners, right?
Anonymous
Post 10/21/2022 23:05     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

They are now doing a five part series.

This is starting to be a bit much...I guess Sarah gets a lot of listens with this particular topic, but seems odd to center your podcast on your former bosses' ex wife if you're trying to build your own career.
Anonymous
Post 10/14/2022 07:57     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:I Heart Racists. https://news.yahoo.com/iheartmedia-atlanta-president-no-longer-222649169.html


What does that have to do with the Sarah and Natasha podcast?
Anonymous
Post 10/14/2022 07:55     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous
Post 10/11/2022 09:41     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

I hope they give additional updates. They should do weekly chats about what it was like with Kane.
Anonymous
Post 10/07/2022 15:30     Subject: Re:Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:People - who cares what she looks like or what she does or does not do for a living. Can we focus on the fact that her divorce advice is straight up bad??? She


Which part is bad?
Anonymous
Post 10/07/2022 13:01     Subject: Re:Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

People - who cares what she looks like or what she does or does not do for a living. Can we focus on the fact that her divorce advice is straight up bad??? She
Anonymous
Post 10/06/2022 17:53     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like with kanes anxiety he’d have had good life insurance with girls as the beneficiaries. There is no way she could not be working if she didn’t have those trusts to pull from (not that she shouldn’t pull from them!)

If there are trusts, they wouldn’t support Natasha or her son.

Wouldn’t she also get child support from her second husband?

CS doesn’t support the mother and certainly doesn’t pay for 100% of the child’s needs. No one knows what he does, their custody arrangement, or what CS would possibly be for the son.


Well it’s clear she living entirely off of support from ex-husbands which would lean towards child support. I lose a lot of respect for her here.

This.
She’s a pathetic professional leech. She’s never managed to do more than live-off men despite being educated with a college degree. Now she’s living off the life insurance of her ex-husband which she says he doubled just a couple of months before his death and it was already plenty before he doubled it. It’s impossible to respect her, but having been married to a narcissist, I say f him. I’m glad she “won” in the end even if there was a high price to pay which shows all over her haggard face thinning hair. I’d respect her if she was ever self-sufficient, but she just jumps from one husband to the next like it’s a job. The only reason she hasn’t remarried is there’s no financial need to do so. I really hope her girls don’t follow her example.


Take a breath honey. And maybe unclench. You are definitely unhinged
Telling the truth. It hurts doesn’t it? Okay, Natasha, so how does it feel to be a 50s -something washed up former drug addict trying to be instafamous and make money by exploiting a tragedy? I guess getting a real job would be much harder, right?


Uh, she's not 50. She's early 40s.
Anonymous
Post 10/06/2022 17:50     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like with kanes anxiety he’d have had good life insurance with girls as the beneficiaries. There is no way she could not be working if she didn’t have those trusts to pull from (not that she shouldn’t pull from them!)

If there are trusts, they wouldn’t support Natasha or her son.

Wouldn’t she also get child support from her second husband?

CS doesn’t support the mother and certainly doesn’t pay for 100% of the child’s needs. No one knows what he does, their custody arrangement, or what CS would possibly be for the son.


Well it’s clear she living entirely off of support from ex-husbands which would lean towards child support. I lose a lot of respect for her here.

This.
She’s a pathetic professional leech. She’s never managed to do more than live-off men despite being educated with a college degree. Now she’s living off the life insurance of her ex-husband which she says he doubled just a couple of months before his death and it was already plenty before he doubled it. It’s impossible to respect her, but having been married to a narcissist, I say f him. I’m glad she “won” in the end even if there was a high price to pay which shows all over her haggard face thinning hair. I’d respect her if she was ever self-sufficient, but she just jumps from one husband to the next like it’s a job. The only reason she hasn’t remarried is there’s no financial need to do so. I really hope her girls don’t follow her example.


Take a breath honey. And maybe unclench. You are definitely unhinged
Telling the truth. It hurts doesn’t it? Okay, Natasha, so how does it feel to be a 50s -something washed up former drug addict trying to be instafamous and make money by exploiting a tragedy? I guess getting a real job would be much harder, right?


Leaning in and being a boss babe are SO 2012. Please get with the times. Women who work are great. Berating others for not working, for whatever reason, is not.


Nothing wrong with being a SHM. Many women decide that’s what’s right foe them and their men supported.. what’s it to you? All SHMs are leeches? I’d like to see what u look like at 50
Anonymous
Post 10/06/2022 12:47     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like with kanes anxiety he’d have had good life insurance with girls as the beneficiaries. There is no way she could not be working if she didn’t have those trusts to pull from (not that she shouldn’t pull from them!)

If there are trusts, they wouldn’t support Natasha or her son.

Wouldn’t she also get child support from her second husband?

CS doesn’t support the mother and certainly doesn’t pay for 100% of the child’s needs. No one knows what he does, their custody arrangement, or what CS would possibly be for the son.


Well it’s clear she living entirely off of support from ex-husbands which would lean towards child support. I lose a lot of respect for her here.

This.
She’s a pathetic professional leech. She’s never managed to do more than live-off men despite being educated with a college degree. Now she’s living off the life insurance of her ex-husband which she says he doubled just a couple of months before his death and it was already plenty before he doubled it. It’s impossible to respect her, but having been married to a narcissist, I say f him. I’m glad she “won” in the end even if there was a high price to pay which shows all over her haggard face thinning hair. I’d respect her if she was ever self-sufficient, but she just jumps from one husband to the next like it’s a job. The only reason she hasn’t remarried is there’s no financial need to do so. I really hope her girls don’t follow her example.


Take a breath honey. And maybe unclench. You are definitely unhinged
Telling the truth. It hurts doesn’t it? Okay, Natasha, so how does it feel to be a 50s -something washed up former drug addict trying to be instafamous and make money by exploiting a tragedy? I guess getting a real job would be much harder, right?


Leaning in and being a boss babe are SO 2012. Please get with the times. Women who work are great. Berating others for not working, for whatever reason, is not.
Anonymous
Post 10/06/2022 12:19     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like with kanes anxiety he’d have had good life insurance with girls as the beneficiaries. There is no way she could not be working if she didn’t have those trusts to pull from (not that she shouldn’t pull from them!)

If there are trusts, they wouldn’t support Natasha or her son.

Wouldn’t she also get child support from her second husband?

CS doesn’t support the mother and certainly doesn’t pay for 100% of the child’s needs. No one knows what he does, their custody arrangement, or what CS would possibly be for the son.


Well it’s clear she living entirely off of support from ex-husbands which would lean towards child support. I lose a lot of respect for her here.

This.
She’s a pathetic professional leech. She’s never managed to do more than live-off men despite being educated with a college degree. Now she’s living off the life insurance of her ex-husband which she says he doubled just a couple of months before his death and it was already plenty before he doubled it. It’s impossible to respect her, but having been married to a narcissist, I say f him. I’m glad she “won” in the end even if there was a high price to pay which shows all over her haggard face thinning hair. I’d respect her if she was ever self-sufficient, but she just jumps from one husband to the next like it’s a job. The only reason she hasn’t remarried is there’s no financial need to do so. I really hope her girls don’t follow her example.


Take a breath honey. And maybe unclench. You are definitely unhinged
Telling the truth. It hurts doesn’t it? Okay, Natasha, so how does it feel to be a 50s -something washed up former drug addict trying to be instafamous and make money by exploiting a tragedy? I guess getting a real job would be much harder, right?
Anonymous
Post 10/06/2022 09:58     Subject: Re:Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

It does appear that she will do anything to avoid getting a real job, including milking her divorces for IG “fame”. I really hope the girls find some help in therapy because they have/had zero suitable parental role models (on both sides).
Anonymous
Post 10/06/2022 08:59     Subject: Sarah Fraser Show / Little Pink Monsters Blogger

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I feel like with kanes anxiety he’d have had good life insurance with girls as the beneficiaries. There is no way she could not be working if she didn’t have those trusts to pull from (not that she shouldn’t pull from them!)

If there are trusts, they wouldn’t support Natasha or her son.

Wouldn’t she also get child support from her second husband?

CS doesn’t support the mother and certainly doesn’t pay for 100% of the child’s needs. No one knows what he does, their custody arrangement, or what CS would possibly be for the son.


Well it’s clear she living entirely off of support from ex-husbands which would lean towards child support. I lose a lot of respect for her here.

This.
She’s a pathetic professional leech. She’s never managed to do more than live-off men despite being educated with a college degree. Now she’s living off the life insurance of her ex-husband which she says he doubled just a couple of months before his death and it was already plenty before he doubled it. It’s impossible to respect her, but having been married to a narcissist, I say f him. I’m glad she “won” in the end even if there was a high price to pay which shows all over her haggard face thinning hair. I’d respect her if she was ever self-sufficient, but she just jumps from one husband to the next like it’s a job. The only reason she hasn’t remarried is there’s no financial need to do so. I really hope her girls don’t follow her example.


Take a breath honey. And maybe unclench. You are definitely unhinged