Anonymous wrote:But let's continue with the mental gymnastics by:

- Referencing Socrates, who we don't know even existed

- Jefferson had a Bible, referenced our "Creator" in the Declaration of Independence . . but no, he was not a Christian referencing our God/Creationism. What acrobatics there.

- Mayflower Compact anyone? "IN THE NAME OF GOD, AMEN. . . Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the CHRISTIAN Faith"

- Virginia Constitution anyone? "That religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator, . . . and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice CHRISTIAN forbearance, love, and charity towards each other."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Jefferson kept the rest of the Bible after removing the miracles and maybe a few other things, I forget the details. If he thought none of it was relevant to him, he wouldn’t have kept any of it. And you’d know about it and you’d be using that fact here, if you could.

That's a gross oversimplification. Here is the last line in the book: "Now, in the place where He was crucified, there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre, wherein was never man yet laid. There laid they Jesus. And rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed."


No resurrection. That's what you call "removing the miracles and maybe a few other things"? The fundamental tenet of Christianity?

You went off track with the usual tired argument about religious values (including but not limited to Christianity) being no different from secular values. That’s the usual oversimplification because most religions have so many other components and different ways of approaching godliness. “Love your enemy” goes beyond the golden rule, for example. But there’s no way I’m interested in another derailment where I need to argue against trite and oversimplified points, so I’ll leave it there.

Of course they are shared values. That is the point. 100% the point. In addition, most of the important ones existed long before Christ and are in the Greek readings that the educated members of our founding fathers read.

#fail

Founding fathers were Christian.

Jesus's golden rule came from a JEWISH golden rule.

And what contemporaneous records prove Socrates existed? Thanks.

Jesus went farther than previous scripture.

Matthew 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

(Also, try to avoid dopey snark like #fail that make you sound like a clueless boomer tapping out insults from his basement.)

Cares about you

Uninformative, fails to add anything here.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Jefferson kept the rest of the Bible after removing the miracles and maybe a few other things, I forget the details. If he thought none of it was relevant to him, he wouldn’t have kept any of it. And you’d know about it and you’d be using that fact here, if you could.

That's a gross oversimplification. Here is the last line in the book: "Now, in the place where He was crucified, there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre, wherein was never man yet laid. There laid they Jesus. And rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed."


No resurrection. That's what you call "removing the miracles and maybe a few other things"? The fundamental tenet of Christianity?

You went off track with the usual tired argument about religious values (including but not limited to Christianity) being no different from secular values. That’s the usual oversimplification because most religions have so many other components and different ways of approaching godliness. “Love your enemy” goes beyond the golden rule, for example. But there’s no way I’m interested in another derailment where I need to argue against trite and oversimplified points, so I’ll leave it there.

Of course they are shared values. That is the point. 100% the point. In addition, most of the important ones existed long before Christ and are in the Greek readings that the educated members of our founding fathers read.

#fail

Founding fathers were Christian.

Jesus's golden rule came from a JEWISH golden rule.

And what contemporaneous records prove Socrates existed? Thanks.

Jesus went farther than previous scripture.

Matthew 43 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor[a] and hate your enemy.’ 44 But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, 45 that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. 46 If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? 47 And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? 48 Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

(Also, try to avoid dopey snark like #fail that make you sound like a clueless boomer tapping out insults from his basement.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Jefferson kept the rest of the Bible after removing the miracles and maybe a few other things, I forget the details. If he thought none of it was relevant to him, he wouldn’t have kept any of it. And you’d know about it and you’d be using that fact here, if you could.

That's a gross oversimplification. Here is the last line in the book: "Now, in the place where He was crucified, there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre, wherein was never man yet laid. There laid they Jesus. And rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed."


No resurrection. That's what you call "removing the miracles and maybe a few other things"? The fundamental tenet of Christianity?

You went off track with the usual tired argument about religious values (including but not limited to Christianity) being no different from secular values. That’s the usual oversimplification because most religions have so many other components and different ways of approaching godliness. “Love your enemy” goes beyond the golden rule, for example. But there’s no way I’m interested in another derailment where I need to argue against trite and oversimplified points, so I’ll leave it there.

Of course they are shared values. That is the point. 100% the point. In addition, most of the important ones existed long before Christ and are in the Greek readings that the educated members of our founding fathers read.

#fail

Founding fathers were Christian.

Jesus's golden rule came from a JEWISH golden rule.

And what contemporaneous records prove Socrates existed? Thanks.

#fail

Founding fathers were Christian.

Jesus's golden rule came from a JEWISH golden rule.

And what contemporaneous records prove Socrates existed? Thanks.

Anonymous wrote:

Jefferson kept the rest of the Bible after removing the miracles and maybe a few other things, I forget the details. If he thought none of it was relevant to him, he wouldn’t have kept any of it. And you’d know about it and you’d be using that fact here, if you could.

That's a gross oversimplification. Here is the last line in the book: "Now, in the place where He was crucified, there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre, wherein was never man yet laid. There laid they Jesus. And rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed."


No resurrection. That's what you call "removing the miracles and maybe a few other things"? The fundamental tenet of Christianity?

You went off track with the usual tired argument about religious values (including but not limited to Christianity) being no different from secular values. That’s the usual oversimplification because most religions have so many other components and different ways of approaching godliness. “Love your enemy” goes beyond the golden rule, for example. But there’s no way I’m interested in another derailment where I need to argue against trite and oversimplified points, so I’ll leave it there.

Of course they are shared values. That is the point. 100% the point. In addition, most of the important ones existed long before Christ and are in the Greek readings that the educated members of our founding fathers read.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Greeks believed in “love your enemy”? You’re going to have to give us a cite for that.

Well we are talking about the values this country was founded on, and that is not one of them. But since you demanded one, I shall oblige:

Socrates held that one must never do harm to another even in return for harm received. His arguments were based on his general theory of virtue and on certain ambiguities in Greek ethical language.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/horizons/article/abs/socrates-and-jesus-on-nonretaliation-and-love-of-enemies/3C8ECC78DA10F4703D10A260262F4E9A

Also, some Christians don’t believe in the resurrection, including the odd Episcopal priest. That’s OK because it’s not the only, or even the central for many, tenet of the faith. More important are what Jesus said and his atonement for mankind through communion.

Some christians? Some christians believe all kinds of things. I was raised as one and the resurrection was fundamental.

You think Jesus, an itinerant carpenter, read Socrates?

WT(heck) are you talking about now? Are you gish galloping away on me here?

We are talking about the values this country was founded on, which was stated in the thread you are replying to... as well as the fact that the founding fathers read the greeks. Stay on topic.


(but no obviously he didn't, but the educated monks that first transcribed the oral history sure did. But let's not go there or start another thread about that.
This one is about the separation of church and state and the baseless claim that it was founded on "judeo christian values".)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The Greeks believed in “love your enemy”? You’re going to have to give us a cite for that.

Well we are talking about the values this country was founded on, and that is not one of them. But since you demanded one, I shall oblige:

Socrates held that one must never do harm to another even in return for harm received. His arguments were based on his general theory of virtue and on certain ambiguities in Greek ethical language.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/horizons/article/abs/socrates-and-jesus-on-nonretaliation-and-love-of-enemies/3C8ECC78DA10F4703D10A260262F4E9A

Also, some Christians don’t believe in the resurrection, including the odd Episcopal priest. That’s OK because it’s not the only, or even the central for many, tenet of the faith. More important are what Jesus said and his atonement for mankind through communion.

Some christians? Some christians believe all kinds of things. I was raised as one and the resurrection was fundamental.

You think Jesus, an itinerant carpenter, read Socrates?

Anonymous wrote:

The Greeks believed in “love your enemy”? You’re going to have to give us a cite for that.

Well we are talking about the values this country was founded on, and that is not one of them. But since you demanded one, I shall oblige:

Socrates held that one must never do harm to another even in return for harm received. His arguments were based on his general theory of virtue and on certain ambiguities in Greek ethical language.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/horizons/article/abs/socrates-and-jesus-on-nonretaliation-and-love-of-enemies/3C8ECC78DA10F4703D10A260262F4E9A

Also, some Christians don’t believe in the resurrection, including the odd Episcopal priest. That’s OK because it’s not the only, or even the central for many, tenet of the faith. More important are what Jesus said and his atonement for mankind through communion.

Some christians? Some christians believe all kinds of things. I was raised as one and the resurrection was fundamental.

The Greeks believed in “love your enemy”? You’re going to have to give us a cite for that.

Also, some Christians don’t believe in the resurrection, including the odd Episcopal priest. That’s OK because it’s not the only, or even the central for many, tenet of the faith. More important are what Jesus said and his atonement for mankind through communion.

Anonymous wrote:

Jefferson kept the rest of the Bible after removing the miracles and maybe a few other things, I forget the details. If he thought none of it was relevant to him, he wouldn’t have kept any of it. And you’d know about it and you’d be using that fact here, if you could.

That's a gross oversimplification. Here is the last line in the book: "Now, in the place where He was crucified, there was a garden; and in the garden a new sepulchre, wherein was never man yet laid. There laid they Jesus. And rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed."


No resurrection. That's what you call "removing the miracles and maybe a few other things"? The fundamental tenet of Christianity?

You went off track with the usual tired argument about religious values (including but not limited to Christianity) being no different from secular values. That’s the usual oversimplification because most religions have so many other components and different ways of approaching godliness. “Love your enemy” goes beyond the golden rule, for example. But there’s no way I’m interested in another derailment where I need to argue against trite and oversimplified points, so I’ll leave it there.

Of course they are shared values. That is the point. 100% the point. In addition, most of the important ones existed long before Christ and are in the Greek readings that the educated members of our founding fathers read.

Jefferson kept the rest of the Bible after removing the miracles and maybe a few other things, I forget the details. If he thought none of it was relevant to him, he wouldn’t have kept any of it. And you’d know about it and you’d be using that fact here, if you could.

You went off track with the usual tired argument about religious values (including but not limited to Christianity) being no different from secular values. That’s the usual oversimplification because most religions have so many other components and different ways of approaching godliness. “Love your enemy” goes beyond the golden rule, for example. But there’s no way I’m interested in another derailment where I need to argue against trite and oversimplified points, so I’ll leave it there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Please. Nobody here ever said
- the Greeks don’t get credit, or
- the idea is “uniquely” Judeo-Christian.

Great, then we agree it's not uniquely judeo christian. So why say the country was founded on judeo christian values and not the Greeks or any otehrs that may have espoused it?

You made that up. What several of us ARE saying is that (1) nobody has a patent on ideas, and also that (2) the same ideas can arise at different times and in different contexts.

No, you are saying it is a judeo christian value and the country was founded on it. You said nothing about "different times and contexts". Because that renders the "founded on judeo christian values" claim moot. The bible talks a lot about food, too. Is food a judeo christian concept? ("That's ridiculous" you are saying to yourself, and I agree 100%);

Separation of church and state IS a Christian idea, even if it’s not exclusively Christian. Perhaps if you drew a Venn diagram that would help.

The idea of "Separation of church and state IS a Christian idea" when the article linked in the very post of this thread shows a majority supporting an elimination of that very distinction is just not a supportable point.

Also, where is your answer to the point about Thomas Jefferson’s modified New Testament? By your own logic, who “won” that one?

You mean the one where the deist Thomas Jefferson made his own bible which removes all miracles and claims of Jesus' divinity? I didn't repsond to that because it supports my point perfectly. He was not a Christian. He did not believe in the bible Christians believe in. End period.

It’s hard to know where to start with all these word games. And it’s understandable why people look at this and think, you’re not arguing honestly and who has time for this. Just a few points, then.

It’s hard to believe you’re still trying to argue, essentially, that separation of church and state is NOT a concept in Christianity. All three synoptic gospels include it. It’s a Christian idea, whoever else also espouses it. If I think Trump is a dangerous toddler, but somebody else had that thought in 1994, that doesn’t invalidate my ability to own that thought. This is so simple I wonder if you’re trolling.

Jefferson believed in the rest of the NT after removing the miracles. So, the Sermon in the Mount et cetera. In fact, the idea that something remains is implicit in the whole process of excerpting. Christians have had doctrinal differences since a few decades after Jesus died. That doesn’t mean they’re not Christians. Jefferson was a deist, but he clearly kept things from Christianity.

So he liked the universal values of being kind to others. The only thing unique in the NT is the mythology.

Goalposts moved

I’m a different poster so not sure what goalposts you were aiming for but the claim was “he clearly kept things from Christianity”. He didn’t keep anything that was uniquely Christian because the only unique thing in Christianity is the supernatural aspect. And even that is not all that unique.

Jefferson kept the rest of the Bible after removing the miracles and maybe a few other things, I forget the details. If he thought none of it was relevant to him, he wouldn’t have kept any of it. And you’d know about it and you’d be using that fact here, if you could.

You went off track with the usual tired argument about religious values (including but not limited to Christianity) being no different from secular values. That’s the usual oversimplification because most religions have so many other components and different ways of approaching godliness. “Love your enemy” goes beyond the golden rule, for example. But there’s no way I’m interested in another derailment where I need to argue against trite and oversimplified points, so I’ll leave it there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Please. Nobody here ever said
- the Greeks don’t get credit, or
- the idea is “uniquely” Judeo-Christian.

Great, then we agree it's not uniquely judeo christian. So why say the country was founded on judeo christian values and not the Greeks or any otehrs that may have espoused it?

You made that up. What several of us ARE saying is that (1) nobody has a patent on ideas, and also that (2) the same ideas can arise at different times and in different contexts.

No, you are saying it is a judeo christian value and the country was founded on it. You said nothing about "different times and contexts". Because that renders the "founded on judeo christian values" claim moot. The bible talks a lot about food, too. Is food a judeo christian concept? ("That's ridiculous" you are saying to yourself, and I agree 100%);

Separation of church and state IS a Christian idea, even if it’s not exclusively Christian. Perhaps if you drew a Venn diagram that would help.

The idea of "Separation of church and state IS a Christian idea" when the article linked in the very post of this thread shows a majority supporting an elimination of that very distinction is just not a supportable point.

Also, where is your answer to the point about Thomas Jefferson’s modified New Testament? By your own logic, who “won” that one?

You mean the one where the deist Thomas Jefferson made his own bible which removes all miracles and claims of Jesus' divinity? I didn't repsond to that because it supports my point perfectly. He was not a Christian. He did not believe in the bible Christians believe in. End period.

It’s hard to know where to start with all these word games. And it’s understandable why people look at this and think, you’re not arguing honestly and who has time for this. Just a few points, then.

It’s hard to believe you’re still trying to argue, essentially, that separation of church and state is NOT a concept in Christianity. All three synoptic gospels include it. It’s a Christian idea, whoever else also espouses it. If I think Trump is a dangerous toddler, but somebody else had that thought in 1994, that doesn’t invalidate my ability to own that thought. This is so simple I wonder if you’re trolling.

Jefferson believed in the rest of the NT after removing the miracles. So, the Sermon in the Mount et cetera. In fact, the idea that something remains is implicit in the whole process of excerpting. Christians have had doctrinal differences since a few decades after Jesus died. That doesn’t mean they’re not Christians. Jefferson was a deist, but he clearly kept things from Christianity.

So he liked the universal values of being kind to others. The only thing unique in the NT is the mythology.

Goalposts moved

I’m a different poster so not sure what goalposts you were aiming for but the claim was “he clearly kept things from Christianity”. He didn’t keep anything that was uniquely Christian because the only unique thing in Christianity is the supernatural aspect. And even that is not all that unique.