Anonymous wrote:Not sure what immature name calling of Republicans as pro-birther, pro-lifer, nut Trumpster will do. Just a child like tantrum here.

We could put metal detectors at schools. To stop shooters from entering schools.

Or, we can call Republicans mean names and talk about a fantasy world without guns. Your choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes something that impacts less than 100 kids a year needs national laws to combat

by that logic the following should be outlawed

Driving, Taking a bath, swimming pools etc

Let’s see … over the past few decades auto regulations have been enacted to improve safety, car seats are continually being improved, setback/fence line requirements exist or else pool owners can be held liable for injuries on their property, etc. but for some reason we throw up our hands when it comes to guns and declare that nothing.absolutely.nothing can be done to make them less deadly. Guns must be special I guess.

here's your problem most of the activists want to ban/outlaw guns. If you went in with more reasonable approaches you might actually get something accomplished. Blame the left wing activists.

For YEARS now “left wing activists” have been asking for common sense gun reform. But the absolute temper tantrum the right has at any mention of regulating gun ownership has left us feeling like maybe we need to just scrap the 2nd amendment and start over. It’s like when my 7 year old gets upset when I try to limit using the iPad. At some point I’m like fine, if you can’t be mature and handle some screen time limitations, then I’m going to take the damn thing away.

Sorry NRA gun nuts, but you’ve proven yourself to be tantruming children about your guns. So you need a timeout at this point.

Yup. Reasonable approaches are met with "they're going to take all our guns!!!" So why not go for broke?

I remember I learned about Sandy Hook because some idiot old classmate of mine's immediate reaction to hearing about Sandy Hook was to talk about his guns in a meme. That was his first impulse in learning about a bunch of dead kids. Sharing a joking Game of Thrones meme.

Something is deeply, deeply wrong with gun nuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gun control. NOW.

How about we make murder illegal? Oh wait, it already is

So, why bother making murder illegal. Is that your logic?

How many school shootings have there been in the UK?
Ireland?
CANADA?
Australia?
New Zealand?

? not sure what your point is, but those countries have very strict gun control, at least I know in the UK they do. My spouse is from there.

But to answer your question -- many already have posted a chart showing how the US is far and above all other countries, including 3rd world countries, in terms of the number of school shootings.

Yes I know that was my point. I was responding to some dingbat saying 'well murder is already illegal' dur dur dur
Same BS that Ammosexuals bring up all the time. Along with 'then make cars and scissors illegal' freaking idiots

oh, yes. It's the same stupid logic... "murder is illegal but it doesn't stop murders..so we don't need more murder laws, right"? Then why bother making murder illegal. Heck, why bother having laws since someone will break the law.

We have speeding laws, but most people speed. Why have speeding laws?
We have theft laws, but we still have theft. Why have theft laws?
We have anti-corruption laws, but look at how many corrupt people there are. So, why bother having corruption law.

I mean, why bother having *ANY* law, per that ammosexual's logic.

But we do have gun laws, and criminals and mentally ill people break them. Keeping guns out of the hands of law abiding, sane citizens will not fix the problem. Crack down on real criminals would be one way to get started. But instead, we're doing the complete opposite.

Anonymous wrote:Repeal the second amendment.

Anonymous wrote:America’s hard on for the second amendment is proof the right only cares about kids if they’re inside someone’s uterus. F anyone who votes for politicians who oppose gun reform. You have blood on your hands too.

There is nothing “pro life” about caring more for the second amendment than innocent children.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gun control. NOW.

How about we make murder illegal? Oh wait, it already is

So, why bother making murder illegal. Is that your logic?

How many school shootings have there been in the UK?
Ireland?
CANADA?
Australia?
New Zealand?

? not sure what your point is, but those countries have very strict gun control, at least I know in the UK they do. My spouse is from there.

But to answer your question -- many already have posted a chart showing how the US is far and above all other countries, including 3rd world countries, in terms of the number of school shootings.

Good guys with guns are not stopping the bad guys with guns. The gun culture in this country is the problem and the lax regulations are a symptom. It all needs to change.

Yes I know that was my point. I was responding to some dingbat saying 'well murder is already illegal' dur dur dur
Same BS that Ammosexuals bring up all the time. Along with 'then make cars and scissors illegal' freaking idiots

oh, yes. It's the same stupid logic... "murder is illegal but it doesn't stop murders..so we don't need more murder laws, right"? Then why bother making murder illegal. Heck, why bother having laws since someone will break the law.

We have speeding laws, but most people speed. Why have speeding laws?
We have theft laws, but we still have theft. Why have theft laws?
We have anti-corruption laws, but look at how many corrupt people there are. So, why bother having corruption law.

I mean, why bother having *ANY* law, per that ammosexual's logic.

But we do have gun laws, and criminals and mentally ill people break them. Keeping guns out of the hands of law abiding, sane citizens will not fix the problem. Crack down on real criminals would be one way to get started. But instead, we're doing the complete opposite.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes something that impacts less than 100 kids a year needs national laws to combat

by that logic the following should be outlawed

Driving, Taking a bath, swimming pools etc

Let’s see … over the past few decades auto regulations have been enacted to improve safety, car seats are continually being improved, setback/fence line requirements exist or else pool owners can be held liable for injuries on their property, etc. but for some reason we throw up our hands when it comes to guns and declare that nothing.absolutely.nothing can be done to make them less deadly. Guns must be special I guess.

here's your problem most of the activists want to ban/outlaw guns. If you went in with more reasonable approaches you might actually get something accomplished. Blame the left wing activists.

For YEARS now “left wing activists” have been asking for common sense gun reform. But the absolute temper tantrum the right has at any mention of regulating gun ownership has left us feeling like maybe we need to just scrap the 2nd amendment and start over. It’s like when my 7 year old gets upset when I try to limit using the iPad. At some point I’m like fine, if you can’t be mature and handle some screen time limitations, then I’m going to take the damn thing away.

Sorry NRA gun nuts, but you’ve proven yourself to be tantruming children about your guns. So you need a timeout at this point.

Yup. Reasonable approaches are met with "they're going to take all our guns!!!" So why not go for broke?

I remember I learned about Sandy Hook because some idiot old classmate of mine's immediate reaction to hearing about Sandy Hook was to talk about his guns in a meme. That was his first impulse in learning about a bunch of dead kids. Sharing a joking Game of Thrones meme.

Something is deeply, deeply wrong with gun nuts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:yes something that impacts less than 100 kids a year needs national laws to combat

by that logic the following should be outlawed

Driving, Taking a bath, swimming pools etc

Let’s see … over the past few decades auto regulations have been enacted to improve safety, car seats are continually being improved, setback/fence line requirements exist or else pool owners can be held liable for injuries on their property, etc. but for some reason we throw up our hands when it comes to guns and declare that nothing.absolutely.nothing can be done to make them less deadly. Guns must be special I guess.

here's your problem most of the activists want to ban/outlaw guns. If you went in with more reasonable approaches you might actually get something accomplished. Blame the left wing activists.

For YEARS now “left wing activists” have been asking for common sense gun reform. But the absolute temper tantrum the right has at any mention of regulating gun ownership has left us feeling like maybe we need to just scrap the 2nd amendment and start over. It’s like when my 7 year old gets upset when I try to limit using the iPad. At some point I’m like fine, if you can’t be mature and handle some screen time limitations, then I’m going to take the damn thing away.

Sorry NRA gun nuts, but you’ve proven yourself to be tantruming children about your guns. So you need a timeout at this point.

Yup. Reasonable approaches are met with "they're going to take all our guns!!!" So why not go for broke?

Anonymous wrote:


I come from a hunting family. We hunt on horseback with a pack of hounds.


We support a nearly total ban on firearms, even if it means no guns for us.