Anonymous wrote:
Interesting that he hasn't included some of the other issues that aren't so nice.....like diverting tax payer money to campaigns and requiring ballot harvesting.
Some of the issues I have.... Why make election day a federal holiday if you have 15 days of early voting?
His definition of "anti-voting" laws is not defined. And, if you listen to Biden, some of the things he has highlighted are not anti-voting at all. He even got 4 Pinocchios for his comments on the GA law.
I am against automatic voter registration or the same day registration.
Against using utility bills and bank statements for ID...... Last I checked no photo on either of these.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Republicans were genuinely worried about voter ID then they would have no problem making it free and easy to obtain.
Most states already do that.
Anonymous wrote:If Republicans were genuinely worried about voter ID then they would have no problem making it free and easy to obtain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, the Republican propaganda machine has really kicked in to overdrive for the last half dozen or so posts.
Actually, they are reasonable questions and concerns. Also, many of these items aren't even a federal power.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, the Republican propaganda machine has really kicked in to overdrive for the last half dozen or so posts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Combats anti-voting laws" is not true. The laws being passed are no tougher than the ones in many other states--see Delaware. The laws being implemented reinforce voter integrity.
Aw, how quaint that you believe that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Registration and voting and vote counting are different actions. States set their own requirements. Some states intentionally try to make it hard for blacks, Hispanics, and college students to register, to vote, and to have their votes counted. It’s always been that way. It’s what conservative state and local governments do. Every one of them.
So, it's not okay to require proof of residency and citizenship to register in Red states? That is what you are saying. Sorry, but the Dem bill is not sufficient. It allows a "work around" which eliminates the need for proof.
Uh, everyone has to have proof of residency to vote in an election. There is a difference between showing that proof to be on the voter rolls, and having an ID card when you show up to vote.
Having an ID card shows that you are that person. Pretty simple. Not hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Registration and voting and vote counting are different actions. States set their own requirements. Some states intentionally try to make it hard for blacks, Hispanics, and college students to register, to vote, and to have their votes counted. It’s always been that way. It’s what conservative state and local governments do. Every one of them.
So, it's not okay to require proof of residency and citizenship to register in Red states? That is what you are saying. Sorry, but the Dem bill is not sufficient. It allows a "work around" which eliminates the need for proof.
Uh, everyone has to have proof of residency to vote in an election. There is a difference between showing that proof to be on the voter rolls, and having an ID card when you show up to vote.
Anonymous wrote:"Combats anti-voting laws" is not true. The laws being passed are no tougher than the ones in many other states--see Delaware. The laws being implemented reinforce voter integrity.
Anonymous wrote:Registration and voting and vote counting are different actions. States set their own requirements. Some states intentionally try to make it hard for blacks, Hispanics, and college students to register, to vote, and to have their votes counted. It’s always been that way. It’s what conservative state and local governments do. Every one of them.
So, it's not okay to require proof of residency and citizenship to register in Red states? That is what you are saying. Sorry, but the Dem bill is not sufficient. It allows a "work around" which eliminates the need for proof.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know about the 'light" on dark money, but the plan to match "small donors' is ripe for abuse. That gives my taxes to people I don't support, in many cases. What could go wrong here?